egg

Why should they relocate? Why should Egypt take them?

Why, for me, because the lurch was daft and unnecessary, and it also reeks of hypocrisy (more so from duck to be fair) given the grief SoG gets for less. Fully deserved imo.

Yep. Not sure what it said pre editing either. Pretty blatant insinuations from people who have the audacity to label SoG anti semitic.

I'll ask my question again. Your insinuation, ditto Duck's, seemed pretty clear.

What do you now say thay was that meant to mean?

He had a point. Pathetic of Batman and Duck to come straight on and fire allegations of a Muslim/anti semitic incident. Them doing that says more about them than their behaviour being highlighted.

That's all very lovely, but why the conclusion that this must have been an anti semitic incident?

Yep. We've shot ourselves in the foot. We should be clear at the top, with games in hand.

Very sad event, and unfortunate that people are quick to lurch to conclusions as to the motive. Seems like the bloke had serious MH issues and this happened as a result.

That'll learn them. Eejits.

Read his post and the article again mate...

Yep! It's looking too late sadly, but a win today makes it interesting.

I'm not a Stephens knocker and I think a lot of people are jumping on a bandwagon. Walker-Peters / Che's goal wouldn't have happened without him. Bednarek wouldn't have been in that position and played that ball. I wouldn't play him at full back, but I'd play him at CB. We need strong leadership on the pitch and he gives that.

To be fair, no I didn't. Rare good day? If it was, I'd imagine that the inconsistency must frustrate RM. We need to be able to rely on players at this stage of the season.

I doubt it. Just is fancied by RM. Understandably.

What's with all this "shoehorn" nonsense? RM gets moaned at for changing his teams, and now gets moaned at for not changing a back 4 which won on Tuesday. Miserable fuckers.

Bacon

Clueless, and blinkered to what's happening, and been happening. Do you even acknowledge that Israel are part of the problem, and therefore need to change to facilitate a solution. For clarity, the Palestinians are and need to.

I think everyone on here seems to support the Israeli right to exist. I'm still unclear exactly who believes their actions wrong (pre and / or post 7/10 - I think some seem unable to look pre), and exactly who feels that the Palestinians have a right to a free state alongside Israel.

I think it wouldn't have happened if there hadn't been the escalation of West Bank raids/detentions and settlements. That, plus the increasingly right wing rhetoric gave hamas enough justification to press the fuck it button which in turn gave Israel enough justification to press the we'll fuck you up properly button. Fanciful or otherwise, the focus must be on the solution not the problem, otherwise like this thread, it'll go round in ever decreasing circles.

I've never said that Whelk. You know that.

I'll put it another way. Who's suggesting it as a credible solution? Everyone knows that ain't an option. The wider world supports two states. If there's a willingness on Israel's part to achieve that, we've got a start.

Nobody is supporting terrorists. Stop with the childish jibes. Why is it wrong to suggest that Israel do not need to create an environment for change and peace? I assume that's you saying that they don't need change, and it's all on those pesky Palestinians? If I assume wrongly, what are you saying?

Jews don't have to live in a Palestinian state. Who's suggesting that as a solution?

For the 100th time, we're now in a different phase, and Hamas are not Palestine.