Jump to content

Lord Duckhunter

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    17,970
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lord Duckhunter

  1. Wrong I’m afraid. Had they done that the referee would have been sent to the monitor to review whether AA affected play. The fact he didn’t means that was what the flag was for.
  2. And Everton’s one would have stood. im amazed at the number of people who haven’t understood what happened, including the sky pundits. The only bloke on TV that seem to understood what happened was Lego. There were 2 decisions to be made. 1 factual and one subjective. Factual one, was Archer offside. Subjective, was AA affecting play. Because the referee didn’t go to the monitor the goal must have been disallowed for AA affecting play. Therefore the only complaint Saints can have is whether the decision to punish AA was a clear and obvious error. The process confused some by taking so long, when it didn’t need to. VAR only needed to check whether the AA decision was a clear and obvious error. Once it decided it wasn’t, Archer decision became irrelevant. They spent about 4 mins on an irrelevant decision.
  3. Don’t be so ridiculous, he’s also got to also be interfering with play. Therefore a subjective decision has to be made regarding players who don’t touch the ball.
  4. You are correct, and VAR agreed with you. You do realise that the on field decision was that AA’s movement affected the Brighton players don’t you? Therefore the VAR had to determine whether THAT was a clear and obvious error. 🤡🤡
  5. I’ve had a decent drop tonight. My mate has a similar machine to me and has been recommending it for ages. The strength has always put me off, but a Black Friday deal led me to give it a try. Bloody wonderful, but I’m feeling a bit tipsy.
  6. I don’t often agree with Lego, but he’s 100% right about this decision. The obsession with the on field decision is hampering the usefulness of VAR. the VAR doesn’t decide whether AA affected the Brighton players, just whether it was clear and obvious that he didn’t. You end up with the on field officials making an error, with VAR backing up that error on the basis that it wasn’t too bad an error. Ridiculous
  7. Exactly. The time was taken deciding an irrelevant aspect of the goal.
  8. Is Lego deluded? Thought we played well first half.
  9. This is the point a lot seem to be missing. Without VAR, it would have been offside as that was the on field decision. The issue for me is the length of time. Ridiculous. The Lino must have flagged for AA (because if he hadn’t the ref would have been sent to monitor if VAR deemed interference), so therefore that was the only check required. If they think it’s not interfering then they need to draw the lines to check Archer. They did it arse about face, with the irrelevant decision taking the time.
  10. “The games perched on a branch” according to the cabbage patch doll.
  11. From that performance he looks like he’s lost the players to me. Far far worse run of games than anything Nathan Jones ever delivered. As for Selles, this bloke makes him look like a football genius. When he’s sacked performances will pick up and the posters who just want to blame the players quality will have egg on their faces. This is not good enough and the buck stops with the Lego headed cock.
  12. Lego seems to be enjoying himself…
  13. Pink kit in Brighton & a bird commentary, games gone…..
  14. What are these fucking sky idiots on about. We have players that can score goals, like Downes 😂😂. The cabbage patch doll is talking pony as well, embarrassing pundits.
  15. Hes been a class above most of our players this season . If the rest were anywhere near his level we would have more points.
  16. Although the “usual suspects” won’t accept it, I just listened to a very good interview with Boris over this. He said pre Shipman the balance was probably about right, a lot of people were “helped” along the way towards a comfortable end of life, and certain unspoken trade offs were accepted. He said a dignified painless end of life needs to be legally found, but this particular bill isn’t it. He worries that it slightly blurs the line between dignified right to die and state endorsed suicide
  17. You keep coming out with this rubbish to defend Lego head. This is what you call a poor squad, a squad which that great managerial genius Chris Wilder took into the top 10 the season after their promotion. Is it so unreasonable to expect our squad (which is so much better) to actually have more than 1 win so far?
  18. You seem incapable of understanding that people may feel a burden on their families or the state DESPITE their family putting absolutely no pressure on them. People who have suicidal thoughts often feel they are a burden & all their families problems would go away should they kill themselves. The pressure wouldn’t necessarily come from family, it would come from within the person themselves.
  19. It was this bloke
  20. Of course it is…Bizarre to think otherwise. You’re either in a wind up over this serious topic, or you’re an idiot. I haven’t worked out which yet.
  21. Can an opinion be perceived? Can hate be considered a strong word when talking about this arrogant cock?
×
×
  • Create New...