Lord Duckhunter

Get him on proper beer not that fizzy p iss they sell. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Great???? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He was top quality the first two years, but since has dropped off a level. Whether that’s to do with lack of quality around him, or the first two seasons being a peak he can’t reach again is debatable. What’s not debatable is he’s head and shoulders above any other option we’ve got. Personally, he annoys me, as he looks too causal for my liking and looks like he’s going through the motions. But he’s probably the first name on the team sheet because we lack a decent replacement Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I’m going to get Sciatica’d up tonight and Juncker a few chicks. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Juncker’s sciatica playing up again today. God what would the #metoo SJW’s make if Trump behaved with birds like this. http:// Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

We need to hear more from him. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He’s calling people thick, but seems to confuse the future relationship with the withdrawal agreement. This happens all the time with the alleged “brightest” of our electorate . Lucas was at it last night on QT. We’re no nearer knowing what Brexit looks like now, than we were the day we voted. What we do know is what the cost/terms of leaving are, if we sign up to May’s turd. The political declaration is so wholly that it can be interpreted in anyway. It could turn out to be the simplest trade deal ever negotiated, it could be a comprehensive FTA, could be Norway+ or a bespoke deal. The only thing it can’t be (under May’s turd) is a permanent “no deal”, but that’s not the preferred option of anyone. A50 was written in such a way that these issues were inevitable, unless the EU seriously thought you’d walk away without a withdrawal agreement. Even now they have absolutely no incentive or reason to water down the backstop. Why would they, when May has made in very clear she won’t contemplate a no deal withdrawal. Even if you think no deal is the most horrendous thing that could ever happen, you can’t allow the other side to know that. The worst victim of a no deal withdrawal will be Eire, but they are not wetting their pants over it like our lightweight politicians are. They maybe in private, but they’re not giving the other side (The UK) that vibe. We are. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What a load of pony, you know full well I meant a vote the public took part in. An election or a referendum, a national vote, not a parliamentary vote. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is a ridiculous statement. Leave will look like whatever the British people want it to look like. If they want a low tax, low regulated economy, then over time they’ll get that. If they want Corbynomics, nationalise everything socialist paradise they’ll get that. The British people will decide, far better way to run a sovereign country than 27 other nations dictating our regulations, immigration and tax policies. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Funny how blokes on a football forum think they know more about the Irish border, the GFA and the troubles, than David Trimble, who helped write it & Arlene Foster whose dad was shot by the IRA. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The country does need to come back together and it would be great if we could get a deal that would do so. But the bottom line is we need to be out of SM,CU & ECJ. It was pretty clear that “take back control” was the theme of the Leave campaign and membership of the SM, CU and subject to the ECJ is contrary to that. Compromises around the edges of that are compatible with the result, full blown membership of any of them is clearly not. The first phrase of healing is for the losing side to accept the result, until they do that, the nation will continue to be divided. The first referendum wasn’t so divisive because the Tony Benn’s, Peter Shore’s & Enoch Powell’s accepted the result. They continued to campaign to leave and continued to be critical of the EEC, but they never questioned the legitimacy of the result or the motives of the other side. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Im sorry, but I don’t agree with this at all. There was no compromise when we voted to Remain the first time, no thought at all of the people that wanted out. Had Remain won 52/48 there wouldn’t have been talk of compromise or discussions about which parts of The EU we should withdraw from to placate the losers. It would have been full steam ahead without a second thought for the 48%. If Corbyn forms a Government winning 52% of the constituencies, he won’t water down his policies to compromise with the 48% who didn’t go labour. All the alleged “rebels” want is the PM to stick to her manifesto commitments, out of the SM, out of CU and no ECJ involvement in UK. It must be the first time in history that people actually advocating party policy are called extremists. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Her hands are tied because she’s tied them together herself. She has given a lesson in the art of negotiations, how not to do it. She is the most inept negotiator known to man. She’s a mixture of incompetent, deceitful and deluded. I wouldn’t trust her to run a bath, let alone a complex withdrawal agreement. Anyway, we are where we are. Personally, I’ve no issue with “no deal” despite the Government & Civil failing in their duty by not preparing properly. She gave her word to the 22 that she was coming back with a legally binding mechanism for getting us out of the backstop unilaterally. Bearing in mind she lies just to get through the day, I somehow doubt this. But if she does manage to get this legally enforceable amendment, then I’ll back her turd deal. She then needs to **** off and someone competent can take over the talks over the future arrangement. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pony Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

“Tonight the Prime Minister had 117 colleagues, that is the majority on the backbenches, who don't have confidence in her. Now these are not all these hard Brexiteer right-wingers... And they are sensible, moderate Conservatives who at this, of all times, with the stakes so high, find themselves in a position where they could not say they had confidence in the Prime Minister. So this is serious.” Even the lush Soubry gets it. A majority of back benchers have no confidence in her. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She was up against nobody this time and also had the payroll vote, which is about 120. Whilst not the result I wanted, it’s not over yet. Maggie won the right to go through to next stage, but lost cabinet support, John Major said if he didn’t get 60% against Redwood he’d go, so to not get to 60% is poor. She won, so the critics need to suck it up. But they’ve got rid of any thought of her fighting the next GE. Also Labour can now call a confidence vote at the maximum time , the DUP & the 117 can tell the party they’ll vote against the Gov unless she goes. It’s not over by a long chalk. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can you name another vote where the decision was voted on again BEFORE the result was implemented. This is what remoaners don’t get. They keep coming up with these clever **** analogies every time there’s some sort of vote. It’s perfectly reasonable for a country to change its mind, perfectly normal to campaign again after your side has lost, hoping to change people’s minds and win next time. But, democracy involves enacting the original result first. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The members didn’t have a vote. I’m sure we will this time and provided the true Conservatives get behind one candidate, a full blooded Brexit believer will walk it. They’ve got one vote already. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Some blokes on Sat were trying to get the “ You signed Whittingham” thing going again, but with Jacket and Ralph inserted . Luckily it didn’t catch on as it was a bit pathetic really imo. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The **** wit couldn’t even unlock the car, I think Olly Robbins must have put the child locks on. All whilst her boss is waiting to see her. http:// How the **** is Corbyn not rinsing her? I dread to think where they’d be with a half sensible opposition. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I believe that we’re training more or at different times, but I don’t buy the players are particularly upset about it. MOST will be pleased if they’re pushed and organised more, imo. I’ve been pretty critical of them, but I reckon for every lazy twt that’s “upset” they’ll be 2 happy to have a change of emphasis and a more intense approach. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

This isn’t an episode of life on Mars. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I thought it was a mixture of thanks and a “keep your heads up”, sort of thing. Certainly was more than going through the motions, seemed genuine. Well received by supporters, but a lot had left by then Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Depressing. God our centre halves are poor, Bednarek & Stephens probably the two who’ve made the least mistakes, that’s how bad it is. Both full backs woeful. PEH & Armstrong have been two shining lights this season, but I thought both were poor today. OR was ok, particularly first half. Lemina, head and shoulders our best player today. Redmond flattered to deceive, again. Austin did his best, but not really good enough. I counted about 5 players and the boss acknowledging us after game, the others slipped off down the tunnel. Bottle jobs, I really can’t stand these twts, the sooner the whole ****ing lot of them go the better. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Shut up snowflake Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk