Dark Munster

Maybe the driver did, and took it to court. "There's no evidence I parked on the pavement, your honour."

Hants not being able to bring in top order batsmen who can score runs reminds me of Saints inability to bring in strikers who can score goals.

Yes, but that's still about a £50m loss. Not to mention the massive PL money down the drain, and that we'll have a much weaker squad. What a clusterf**k by Martin "I don't worry about our league position" Semmens, Rasmus "I can see reference points you lot can't" W. Ankersen, and SR.

True, but Lavia was injured when Romeu left. The mistake was not either keeping Romeu as a back up, or bringing in a DM back up. Of course that is just one of the multitude of mistakes, all mentioned in this thread, in this clusterf**ck of a season.

Both I think.

I doubt very much he'd see playing for the first team that way.

If Rasmus W. Ankersen has any say in our next manager we're screwed.

Agree with everything from the OP, except about Luggy. He was NOT out of his depth, 1.23 points per game average, and was only around for the first 2 matches of that disastrous season (W 1, L 1) before the players forced him out. To compare him to Nathan F**king Jones is laughable.

Didn't Hants get a grand total of one point in that match? A big reason why they finished top.

This. De Bruyne and Haaland are from another planet, and City can destroy the best teams in the world (ask Liverpool). We played ok for most of the first half, and then the two aforementioned destroyed us. My anger is directed at the debacles that preceded today, including Villa away, Leeds away, Forest, Wolves (twice), West Ham away, Rasmus W. Ankersen and Nathan F**king Jones.

Is Nathan Jones' brother their manager?

Probably something along the lines that we plebs can't see the "reference points" behind the scenes, and that they are completely relaxed and financially prepared for the 6th biggest league in the world.

Agreed with the 3 going down. Disagree about wanting anyone else: the weaker the other teams going down, the better for us.

Mitrovic has been given an 8 match ban. You have to laugh. Mind you, we'll probably already be down by then.

He's out injured I heard.

75% chance of going down? That's quite generous. Should be at least 90% I reckon.

The 2 worst teams, to give a better chance of going up. Bournemouth definitely then. Hard to choose the other one. Maybe Leeds, or Everton (since they have financial problems and they are forced to sell their good players). Probably wouldn't want Forest, since they have shown they can walk the championship, and they have the right manager to do it again.

I thought he had a good game today. Stu Armstrong on the other hand ...

I reckon our bench would beat their bench.

West Ham’s lineup looks strong. Several players back for them. This could get ugly.

You can call a turd anything you like, but it's still a turd.

The majority over here can't stand the fascist Republican party. The problem is that the election system is at a banana republic level. Starting with the joke called the Electoral College, where someone like HRC gets 4 million more votes but loses to the Orange Turd, due to presidential elections being decided by how many electoral votes a state gives, rather than the popular vote that every other developed country does. Then there is the senate, which can block popular legislation (like banning assault weapons of war and stopping lunatics getting hold of them). That joke of a body has 2 senators per state, regardless of size. So for example California with about 40 million people has 2 (Democratic) senators, and Wyoming with only about 600K people also has 2 senators (Republicans, of course). Throw in unlimited legalised bribery (thanks to the fascist Republicans on the Supreme Court), along with gerrymandering for the House, and the whole system is FUBAR.