Dark Munster

This is what Wilcox said about RM on his appointment: “Russell has shown fantastic qualities in his managerial career so far and is someone who we believe will thrive in the great environment we have here at Southampton. “He is a fantastic fit for what we are trying to achieve, with a strong record of developing and nurturing young, talented players to fulfil their potential and deliver results on the pitch. “We can’t wait for Russell to get started working with the team at Staplewood as we get ready for the new season.” So either JW is as clueless as Ankersen, Kraft and the rest of the SR clowns (who are the ones who chose Wilcox, BTW), or toes the party line and is a bullshitter. Either way, it looks like we are in deep shit if we are relying on JW to help us get out of this mess.

Yes, an experienced manager who knows the f*cking basics, caretaker or on a rolling one year contract.

This arsehole is the mastermind behind all of it. A complete charlatan and fraud. A legend in his own mind. https://trainingground.guru/articles/rasmus-ankersen-why-football-clubs-should-embrace-failure

He also needs to do the same with Rasmus W. Ankersen and the rest of the SR clowns.

Sorry, I can't wait any longer for this.

Unfortunately not, it's pick by that plonker Martin.

Stop it, you're giving me a glimmer of hope!

Shocking. So the question is, how long is Dragan going to put up with this? It's his money they are pissing down the drain for unmitigated disastrous results.

Oh shit, don't give ideas to Ankersen.

Quite simple really, SR and Rasmus W. Ankersen are clueless morons. Jones and Selles, exhibits A and B. Tall Paul, no striker last summer, etc., etc. The list of disastrous decisions goes on and on. Smile at them, show them a nice powerpoint and have fancy hair, and they'll believe any bullshit you spout. I'm sure they're lapping up his pathetic excuses about needing to be patient, players just need to be more brave, and we're still suffering from a relegation hangover. Oh, and the fans are making it difficult for them. And what's really worrying is Wilcox seems to be not much better.

Hopefully RM will have been sacked by then. Earlier preferably but I’m not holding my breath

Unfortunately I think that’s true. They are clueless about football and so do not understand we have an incompetent manager.

Southampton Football Club is delighted to announce that Russell Martin has been appointed as its new Men’s First Team Manager. The 37-year-old joins on a contract that runs until 2026 at St Mary’s, after the club reached an agreement to secure his services. Martin has spent the past two seasons as head coach of the Welsh club, earning widespread acclaim for the team’s progress and style of play during that time, as he led them to within three points of an unlikely Championship playoff berth in the most recent campaign. Prior to his time there, Martin impressed in his first managerial role, spending a season-and-a-half at MK Dons in League One, overseeing significant improvement in the side’s performances. Southampton FC Chairman, Henrik Kraft, said: “We are extremely excited to welcome Russell to Southampton. “Russell was the stand-out candidate throughout our recruitment process and we are confident his strong track record, alongside the experienced leadership of our new Director of Football, Jason Wilcox, will deliver great results.” Director of Football, Jason Wilcox, added: “Russell has shown fantastic qualities in his managerial career so far and is someone who we believe will thrive in the great environment we have here at Southampton. “He is a fantastic fit for what we are trying to achieve, with a strong record of developing and nurturing young, talented players to fulfil their potential and deliver results on the pitch. “We can’t wait for Russell to get started working with the team at Staplewood as we get ready for the new season.” _______________ F*ck off Henrik Kraft. F*ck off Jason Wilcox. F*ck off Russell Martin. And f*ck off Rasmus W. Ankersen, I know you're behind this shit too. F*ck off all of you, you bunch of incompetent wankers.

And bears shit in the woods

If Ipswich are going to win this they could at least do us a favour and put away all their chances to give us a good spanking. At least hasten the numpty’s departure.

I wrote "Apart from a last minute win against a poor Sheff. Wed. side, it's lurched from poor to appalling ..." which implies that was the one decent performance. So hardly "some revisionism". @Harry_SFC 's post sums it up for me:

Sounds good to me! The tricky part will be convincing City to do a swap with Pep.

It seems the majority have had enough. Too early for a poll? Apart from a last minute win against a poor Sheff. Wed. side, it's lurched from poor to appalling, with schoolboy level tactical errors. Even before his appointment he, like Jones, seemed a crap choice, maybe even more so, given his poor record with the Swans. But even if he's fired (hopefully soon, but I'm not holding my breath with the muppets in charge), the odds are that they will appoint yet another smooth talking hipster piece of crap. Ah, but we've got Wilcox in charge, so everything's ok. Yeah right, wasn't he supposed to be the one who chose that pillock RM, or at least approved the choice? Not to mention saying we have a strong stable of goalkeepers. He may have been good with kids at a club with untold riches, but does that make him qualified to be a director of football of a whole club? We better hope so, otherwise we're f*cked. The signs aren't good.

That’s what I’ve been wondering. Many think JW is some messiah. I suppose in a way I can understand people putting him on a pedestal, because of the sheer incompetence of Rasmus W. Ankersen and co. anyone semi competent looks like a genius in comparison. But if he is the one who chose RM then Dragan needs to haul him into his office and ask him what the f*ck is going on.

No Vince. 🙁

It's quite remarkable, isn't it? But there have been strong indications that RM was a Wilcox choice. SR and Rasmus W. Ankersen hid in the background while they let Wilcox introduce the new manager signing, implying he was chosen by Wilcox. But the club were after RM for quite a while, before Wilcox himself was appointed. So I would really like to know, who was the "brains" behind choosing a mediocre lower league manager, with a poor defensive record, and no previous success? It screams of another Rasmus W. Ankersen hipster choice, desperately trying to find his new Thomas Bloody Frank, but hiding behind Wilcox for plausible deniability after his Jones debacle. I really hope this is the case, because if not, it means our "saviour" Wilcox is clueless and is definitely not the messiah.

You have a lot of trust in Wilcox. This is the Wilcox who claimed we have a stable of good goalkeepers. This is the Wilcox who chose RM (allegedly). If he (RM) continues with his brainless tactics that allow other teams to walk through our midfield like a hot knife through butter, then Wilcox's judgement has to be seriously questioned. Yes he did well with the City academy, but that's different than being DOF. It's not like the warning signs weren't there from RM's previous job. Of course RM may actually have been a Rasmus W. Ankersen choice (this is what I have suspected from the beginning), with Wilcox being used to publicly support the appointment for plausible deniability on Ankersen's part. I really hope that is the case, because if not, I have little confidence Wilcox will make the right choice after they sack RM.

Making a smarmy, self-idolising website, or breaking things that aren't broken?

BBC: Hampshire have been deducted three points in the County Championship for preparing a "below average" pitch for their match against Essex in July. A further 20-point penalty has been suspended until the end of next season. 3 points this season is irrelevant. The 20 suspended points will be deducted if the club commits any further breach of the Pitch Regulations in relation to the County Championship on or before that date. The Beeb didn't mention that little fact.

That's what I've been advocating for a while: feet only for offside, and time limit for a decision (somewhere 15-30 seconds). In ice hockey they use only the position of the attacker's skates to determine the offside rule in that game. Throw in a thick enough line parallel to the last defender's boot, to give a suitable margin of error in the attacker's favour, and problem solved. Common bloody sense, so I doubt either idea will be adopted.