Dark Munster

Mine too. Romeu a close second, who also had a great game.

That may be true, but you can't argue that he's a legend in his own mind.

I think some posters are confusing being unlikeable with being totally crap at their job. It's possible to be one without the other. Mourinho and the Clown being examples from both sides. Saggy did of course achieve being both.

Did Bednarek get one of those goals?

I wouldn't say the clown was unlikeable, in fact he seemed a decent enough person. It's just he couldn't manage his way out of a wet paper bag.

--

That's a very specific prediction. If you're right I'll eat my hat send you money to buy me a lottery ticket.

So unless the Skates are tier 3 they'll be back to their normal level.

Shame Spurs now have a manager who knows how to win trophies. With City in disarray and Liverpool with serious injury problems, they (Spurs) could have a shot at the title this year. It would be amusing if Leicester pip them to it again, although that would make me very jealous of them.

He's baaack. Reports of Bearsy's demise appear to have been greatly exaggerated.

I've been saying this for years. I would suggest the goalie sub can only be used in the event of injury, not as a tactical move to time waste in added time.

Not really, because offside is determined when the ball is played forward. After that it doesn't matter how you score, as long as the attacker's feet are level or behind the feet of the last defender at the moment of the pass. The idea is to make it simpler to implement, while not making a drastic change in the rule.

Even better, change the offside rule so that only feet are considered. The position of pointing arms, hairy arm pits, etc. are then irrelevant. Simples.

Yes. And then going off injured until we meet again. You can bet your house on it.

Me too. As long as it doesn't involve us.

Not from bloody Monaco I hope.

This disease is a bastard because the outcome of getting it isn't just binary: die or fully recover. Those who advocate not doing anything and relying on herd immunity seem to believe it is. Even if we accept a 1-2% mortality rate (which is ten times or more higher than the flu), how can we accept 20% or higher of those who don't die having long term, maybe permanent, organ damage? https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-tragedy-of-the-post-covid-long-haulers-2020101521173 Published studies (see here and here) and surveys conducted by patient groups indicate that 50% to 80% of patients continue to have bothersome symptoms three months after the onset of COVID-19 — even after tests no longer detect virus in their body. Long-haulers include two groups of people affected by the virus: Those who experience some permanent damage to their lungs, heart, kidneys, or brain that may affect their ability to function. Those who continue to experience debilitating symptoms despite no detectable damage to these organs.

Just like last week!

As long as we don't play Everton in the next 3 matches I don't care if it's a 1 or 3 match ban. He got sent off, we won (in style), and KWP isn't injured. All's well that ends well.

He does that on purpose to jinx us. Bastard. The only thing that pisses me off more than that is when he predicts us to draw or lose.

His passing has been excellent in the last few matches. His confidence appears to be high, keen to bring the ball forward, and he's defending well. If only he was a bit faster than an oil tanker.

Yes, percentages are misleading. If the league only had 10 teams, with just one team going down, then only 10% of the teams would get relegated. Sounds good, until you realise the team finishing 10th goes down!

You missed a biggie: Parachute payments scrapped. So with 17th and 18th relegated, and 16th having a very good chance of joining them, this would sooner or later destroy clubs our size.

Yes, didn't scroll down. Cheers.