-
Posts
9,902 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Dark Munster
-
-
Very good players for us, but not great.
-
That would be a reasonable compromise. If the club offers that and he refuses then it would mean he wants to leave soon, and as others have said the release clause talk is basically a load of bollocks, just an attempt to make it appear otherwise.
-
He predicted us to lose 2-0 against Leicester. On the bright side, how often does lightning strike twice?
-
The good posters no longer post here and you can see why...
Dark Munster replied to Dusic's topic in The Saints
No, the moderators exterminated him. One brag about predicting 17th too many. -
The good posters no longer post here and you can see why...
Dark Munster replied to Dusic's topic in The Saints
I guess so. The question often asked though, what do bears do when they are in the woods? -
Really? That's the first I heard about that. If true, the ruddy-cheeked bastard is a bigger idiot than I thought. Talk about being penny wise, pound foolish.
-
The good posters no longer post here and you can see why...
Dark Munster replied to Dusic's topic in The Saints
He made a brief cameo appearance a few months back, but seems to have gone back into the woods. -
That reminds me, where's Batman? He used to do excellent summaries.
-
Norwegian, Swedish, they all look the same.
-
5 minutes gone, already two mentions of "record defeat" and "9-0" here in the States.
-
9.14% interest ... WTF??
-
It's not a matter of if, but when. I wonder how long it will take them to mention that result? Quicker than Shane Long's goal?
-
Rickie is his full name, Ricky for short.
-
Fantastic performance. All played well, special mention to Ings, Armstrong, Stephens, Bednarek. Diallo MoM.
-
And by that token maybe professional footballers would be fairly high on the vaccine priority list?
-
Fraser Forster I hope.
-
Bad luck that he's not that great a manager.
-
Have we been unlucky with ref/VAR decisions in the previous 4 games.
Dark Munster replied to allsa001's topic in The Saints
Yes there will always be borderline offsides, but by using feet only it will be much simpler to implement, with fewer errors. If a player's foot is offside by 1 mm and the goal stands, or 1 mm onside and it's ruled out, who cares? Those would be rare instances, and it'll even itself out over the short run. If a player is that close to being offside/onside both the attacker and defender can't complain if it the decision goes against them. Also someone mentioned that a player can score with other parts of his body. Again, who cares? The idea is to have a rule that stops long punts and goal hangers, and that wouldn't change using feet only. As they say, K.I.S.S. -
I'd bite your arm off. Strange, 69 matches and 2 years without a 0-0, and now 2 come along in a row, maybe 3. Just like London buses.
-
This has 0-0 written all over it.
-
https://soccer.streamsgate.tv/event/southampton-vs-west-ham-united-match-preview/
-
Jannik Vestergaard - Official: Signs for Leicester
Dark Munster replied to ChiefScummer's topic in The Saints
In a way it's a good job he doesn't have that, otherwise Liverpool would snap him up faster than you could say Van Dick. -
Yes indeed, 69 matches apparently. Surprised no-one has mentioned it. It's been a long 2 years for Lord Trousers, not being able to say "this has 0-0 written all over it."
