Jump to content

Dark Munster

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    9,620
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dark Munster

  1. Yes indeed, as some of us have been saying since Pelle left. Adam's doesn't fill that gaping hole.
  2. That's a massive positive when compared to the likes of Lemina and that Osvaldo nutter.
  3. While we're at it, OR or SA for PEH.
  4. And Danny, if you're reading this, please stop sliding on your knees when you celebrate your goals. Ta!
  5. Yes indeed. The questions were about the large fee for someone with a horrific injury record. And his problems last season didn't put those concerns to rest. I don't remember any "dickheads" who questioned his ability. IF he continues to stay fit then it will have been a good gamble that paid off.
  6. But they (rightly) don't do that in the PL, which is why we got away with it. If they'd done a Women's WC type VAR analysis we would've waited 3 minutes before having the goal disallowed. And I think the point of the new rule is to avoid having a long deliberation if an attacking handball is intentional or not. Handball, yes or no? 10 second VAR check and it's done one way or the other.
  7. The booing during play doesn't help. By all means boo at HT and FT if necessary.
  8. Not the best choice of gif, considering that virtually everything that comes out of the orange Dotard's mouth is a lie.
  9. A period of 5 minutes was the difference between dead and having a fighting chance.
  10. Don't count out Leicester.
  11. Amateurish then doesn't mean having to go back to being amateurish now. Back then it was even worse, 0 points for both teams if a match was abandoned without a ball being bowled (cost Hants the championship). That stupidity was rectified. And when the league was split they had a balanced schedule, so an uneven schedule was ended too. Why go back to it, especially now we have relegation. Imagine last season one team playing Essex and Somerset only once and Notts twice, and another team having it the other way around. Yes Div 2 had an unbalanced schedule when they had 10 teams, but there is no relegation so it was not quite as bad. Still, it should've been balanced too.
  12. Didn't we once have a player who was out for a while because he dropped a bottle of salad cream on his foot?
  13. I'm British and I don't understand why they can't play 18 matches.
  14. Fixtures are out: https://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/50549193 What a joke. Hants only play Lancs, Northants, Essex and Surrey once. An amateurish way to run a professional sport.
  15. Is there a live stream?
  16. I think you've answered your own question.
  17. And not get relegated. Oh wait, that'll mean no Markus and we'll still have the ruddy-cheeked bastard in charge. But then again, no Gao. My head hurts ....
  18. Bless him, he's found his level. "A revolutionary new coaching set up." - The Ruddy-cheeked Bastard.
  19. If we win the first 5 our tails will be up and out of the bottom 3, and then I'd fancy our chances of getting a point at Stamford bridge.
  20. It certainly did at the time. But it was before our second goal. If he had scored, the rest of the match would've been different, and there's no way of knowing if we'd got a third goal (butterfly effect, innit). It would be more sickening if it had happened after the penalty.
  21. This. It reminds me of the Everton and Boro 2-2 capitulations of the 2004/5 relegation season. I'm getting the same sense of doom. Norwich winning today doesn't help with my mood. Yes Bertrand was very good, PEH a waste of space.
  22. That obviously refers to performance not score. We missed at least 4 sitters.
  23. Yes "non performers" who could've beaten Arsenal by 4 goals. Poor finishing yes, but "non performers" don't rip a big 6 team to shreds at their place.
  24. I can give you one.
×
×
  • Create New...