Dark Munster

Really? That's the first I heard about that. If true, the ruddy-cheeked bastard is a bigger idiot than I thought. Talk about being penny wise, pound foolish.

He made a brief cameo appearance a few months back, but seems to have gone back into the woods.

That reminds me, where's Batman? He used to do excellent summaries.

Norwegian, Swedish, they all look the same.

.

5 minutes gone, already two mentions of "record defeat" and "9-0" here in the States.

9.14% interest ... WTF??

It's not a matter of if, but when. I wonder how long it will take them to mention that result? Quicker than Shane Long's goal?

Rickie is his full name, Ricky for short.

Fantastic performance. All played well, special mention to Ings, Armstrong, Stephens, Bednarek. Diallo MoM.

And by that token maybe professional footballers would be fairly high on the vaccine priority list?

Fraser Forster I hope.

Bad luck that he's not that great a manager.

Yes there will always be borderline offsides, but by using feet only it will be much simpler to implement, with fewer errors. If a player's foot is offside by 1 mm and the goal stands, or 1 mm onside and it's ruled out, who cares? Those would be rare instances, and it'll even itself out over the short run. If a player is that close to being offside/onside both the attacker and defender can't complain if it the decision goes against them. Also someone mentioned that a player can score with other parts of his body. Again, who cares? The idea is to have a rule that stops long punts and goal hangers, and that wouldn't change using feet only. As they say, K.I.S.S.

I'd bite your arm off. Strange, 69 matches and 2 years without a 0-0, and now 2 come along in a row, maybe 3. Just like London buses.

This has 0-0 written all over it.

https://soccer.streamsgate.tv/event/southampton-vs-west-ham-united-match-preview/

In a way it's a good job he doesn't have that, otherwise Liverpool would snap him up faster than you could say Van Dick.

Yes indeed, 69 matches apparently. Surprised no-one has mentioned it. It's been a long 2 years for Lord Trousers, not being able to say "this has 0-0 written all over it."

He hasn't scored in the PL since mid-September. So yes, you can bet your house on it.

Good news if it's only pain and not a serious injury, then that shouldn't slow Vestergaard down.

Another house won

One of Spurs, Liverpool, City and Chelsea will probably win it. There is definitely a chance for a team to do a Leicester though, but I don't think we have the depth. If a team does do a Leicester, my money's on Leicester.

Just to pour salt on the wounds, I got notification today that Arsenal vs Saints has just been dropped from Peacock tomorrow and moved to NBCSN (which I don't subscribe to). And now there are hardly any PL matches on Peacock. Dodgy streams here we go.