John B

There is no problem selling a player if there is a replacement available. We sold Wayne Bridge and Got Graham Le Saux we sold Dean Richards and got Michael Svennson years ago we sold Martin Chivers who was replaced by Micky Channon I think if we sold Andrew Surman next year Joseph Mills would be a good replacement So there is no real problem selling players

I have no complaints at the moment Got rid of Safri Licka Powell Wright Ostlund Viafara no problem replaced with Wooton, Mogan Sch, Perry, Holmes, James and Gillett Loaned Saga Rasiak No Problem looking for one replacement striker Sold Davies slight problem but replaced by Jack Cork who maybe better

I just like JP He seems to know what he is doing despite comments on another thread regarding communication.

Do you not realise owing to financial reasons we can buy in players. I am reasonably sure that we are not going to get in a left back unless Surman leaves. If we get in a left back where will Surman play? Not Central Midfield I would have thought or Left Wing

oh dear

Yes you are indeed correct but I feel the way SFC are trying to run the team with youngsters may be the way forward

Does this seem a familiar story http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulfletcher/2008/08/madjeski_right_to_hit_out_at_w.html#035131

Never mind Lowe it is morons like you who are ruining the club

only problem this team would bankrupt us

I doubt if he will be playing for us in the near future

Jan P is in charge and it appears to me that Bart is number 2.

OK fair enough but I think you will find James and Surman will be the first choice full backs unless Andrew goes. JP is only looking for another forward and is building for the future

Amazing comment. Is it not possible they may become excellent fullbacks Jan P thinks so

I think you could have said Thomas demonstrated what he was against Stoke, a useless £1million ***** Another of George's wonder buys I did think our luck had changed when I read Pompey seal permanent Thomas deal on BBC Sport Onlt to learn it was someone else

I agree we have to stay in the league but we may as well replace all our youngsters with loanees . That I am afraid is ridiculous James and Surman must be given an extended run

We already have midfielders but I take your point. But we must keep playing our own players otherwise we will never progress because Cork will eventually return to Chelsea

I am certain the management team have it under control if Davis leaves See how quickly they got Cork in

How on earth are James and Surman to improve if they dont play. This short termism has already cost us Blackstock and Cranie

I agree with Adrian there is a lot of negative posting here. Lots of posters continually try to read something negative into every situation. There is also a lot of abuse directed at the board by people who are ill informed and bigoted. However everybody has a point of view and should be given the opportunity to raise it.

Interesting Why did his Wolves move collapse

Exactly what you think completely devoid of reality.

What is the point of this post. If a player read it it may make him think its not worth playing here where players are abused all the time. What I think Jan is trying to say is that we are nearly at the end of the player sales/loans and we will only sell if we get an extremely high bid

I dont see any positive information we are going to get him

Your interpretation is obviously different from mine. I thought the situation he was alluding to was that SFC were trying to shift Skacel Euell and Thomas but as yet there were no firm offers. He wants to recruit another stiker and centre back which seems sensible to me

It is about time they got behind the team then is it not? All this negative feeling must be affecting the team