Jump to content

Window Cleaner

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31,952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Window Cleaner

  1. And so he will with the 2 million £ hit in the pocket that administration will bring to him. He should never, ever have tried his "coup d'etat" back in July 2007, if he hadn't done that he'd probably still be running the show and putting in 2 million £ every week or so.;)
  2. But this is like Andrew Davies all over again, everybody (well half of you anyway) were sh*t scared that he would be far too good for us and we wouldn't do anything against him. Result? Subbed at half time (I think or didn't even play) and we win 3-1. He's been chucked out of the side at Preston or so it would seem.Blackstock probably won't get a game against us unless he starts scoring in every match from next Saturday onwards the Forest fans will get on his case.
  3. Saga's probably doubling up as footman at Lowe Towers then.
  4. Why did they stop playing him then?? Couldn't afford his appearance fees perhaps.
  5. Draw 1-1 or so,keeps them both in the scrap. The more there are the better chance we have of staying up.I think Forest will get a severe tonking though,Davies has gone mad on the loans front, signing more loan players than he can field and destabilising the team when it doesn't need to be .
  6. Probably Bacardi and Diet Coke in our politically correct age.
  7. It was a squad with no creative ability whatsoever and defenders who won't ever get a look in at first team level if they don't undergo 100% improvement. It was a crap side, probably one of the worst reserve sides we've ever put out. Gobern has gone right off the boil since he scored for the first team,may have got injured though..
  8. You must rate Blackstock more highly than I do then. What difference will he make to forest at the rate of a goal every 3.5 games? Sounds like the panic button is being pushed down at' City Ground.7 loanees of which they can put 5 on the team sheet.
  9. I'd probably spend it more usefully though, a nice villa somewhere hot and a very small Porsche. Far better than spending it on more useless wasters.
  10. True, but I meant current first teamers who play on a regular basis. Should have been specific I suppose.Anyway very poor result although Reading did play Lita, why is he hanging about in their reserves when they can't score against crap like Palarse? They could loan him to us (and pay him of course).
  11. Exactly, that's why Skacel, Euell and Saga are still here. Still our gain is the other teams' loss.
  12. Patterson and Smith played, Holmes got about 30 minutes. But the rest of the side looked really weak.Our reserve strength is really lamentable, Hatch,Imudia, Kyle Davies and all that. The reserves should be the ante-chamber to the first team, ours is the ante-chamber to the tyro league. If we hadn't got cheap loans like Smith and Gasmi we wouldn't even have a reserve team most of the time..
  13. Do you really think that Kelvin would accept significantly reduced terms then? He likes it here but I don't think he's a registred charity yet. Euell ? they'd need to be really reduced, 14K week is silly money.Will get offered about 4K I expect.
  14. Reserves got tonked today,no first teamers involved apart from Liptak, looked like an academy side really. Not even Pullis or Gasmi. Must enquire as to whether Gasmi may have returned to Strasbourg already.
  15. As few as that, I thought it was over half.
  16. His pride might be hurt by it, agreed, his wallet is made of sterner stuff. Does Secure Retirement still exist?
  17. Novel idea, although his scoring record at Watford tends to indicate he's probably fractionally better than McG at 3 times the price.Getting on a bit in my opinion.Could be an idea if we're still in the CCC with extra money though. Mind you I'd rather have the 750K from Watford .
  18. Urggggghhhhhhhhh,Groundhog day come August then.
  19. All this "Rupert will lose money stuff "is real tosh. His initial investment has been repaid times over ,albeit from work done for the PLC.Wilde will lose money, so will Crouch amongst others.They put up hard cash, Wilde may have been able to write a bit of it off because Merlion PLC held most of the shares, Crouch will get hit straight in the pocket region for nigh on 2 million £.
  20. I bloody well hope not, we don't need to be arguing about whether we should have loaned him out to ...... all next season as well.Watford won't give us 750K for him to be sure (although that would tend to indicate that he does have another year).
  21. They won't be coming back, both out of contract this summer I think.
  22. No money for Davis this summer, think he's out of contract. Saga ? well we haven't found a taker yet despite a year of trying so not so hopeful there McGoldrick will be sold for about 2.3 million and you'll all be really pleased. Schneiderlin will return to France for about 500K(cos he hates it here) and with the proceeds of those 2 sales Rupert will buy us an 8 yr old tyro striker from Paraguay.Surman may move on but Weston will no doubt inform us in due time.
  23. This is wrong, if we stayed up (but not 10 points clear of the last relegation place) we'd cop -10 at the end of the season and go down. If we go down anyway we'd cop -10 next season.
  24. And what style would that be then? They don't have any "style" whatever they had went out of the door with Pardew when he was replaced by the boot boy. Charlton got 13 points from their first 10 games this season, they've got 16 from the last 30.
  25. I've just noticed that when you look at an old thread your post count shows it's current value.Weird huh, I'm sure that Doc Brown probably explained it in Back to the Future III though. I think that was one of Dogman's first posts, although it shows as his 12th now
×
×
  • Create New...