Jump to content

Window Cleaner

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    32,267
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Window Cleaner

  1. Well you know what they say, No news is bad news. The fact that McMenemy is reported to have seen Mr Fry twice is worrying, unless of course it's Souness that he's involved with and not...Crouch et al. I just have the nasty feeling that Crouch will try to get his hands on the train set again, whether he has the money to do it or not, it seems to be something of an obsession with him...not that Rupert's any better either.I just feel that all the usual suspects are coming up with their usual "aneries" and valuable time is being lost getting on with serious channels.
  2. I don't think we actually own all of Staplewood, we own a part of it and the rest is leased to us.
  3. I am actually quite amazed that in the space of 1 week,approximately 33% of the time Mr Fry said we had available, we have ,or seem to have, achieved ...Nothing. If anything the situation seems to have become more confused.
  4. Now I know what ITK means Insolvent Tyre Kicker, always wondered before.
  5. Yep, but you'll probably get beheaded if you get caught....Oh no right that's Saudi.
  6. Right, another curved ball that's difficult to understand in the general context of the affair. Are SFC Ltd paying their own bills as you would expect of an independent company not in administration or is the administrator paying them? Surely the whole crux of the "no points deduction" would be defeated if the administrator was acting for SFC Ltd.
  7. Who's paying Michael Fiddy?? (DLA Piper) is it SFC Ltd, the Administrators, or some other party. Probably doesn't come cheaply either.
  8. I don't think it's a case of staying away even, it's a case of not going to football any more.If the tickets were £15 and £5 we'd probably get more that full price and £1. There's the shirt offer of course but a shirt is no doubt about £40 so unless you really wanted one anyway it's not a big break.
  9. See he's already got the right coloured tie!!
  10. The last photo in the article looks odd, as if their heads had been paintshopped on to the suits.
  11. Because some legal eagle told him that we could circumnavigate the 10 point deduction anyway. Why they couldn't just sell the FC to someone for a nominal fee the day before the PLC went into administration beats me.
  12. Well of course, however the stance being taken seems to be that FL rules are in no way applicable, which we know won't be the case.
  13. But the FC aren't in administration thus don't have to comply with league rules to come out of it cos they aren't in it. Football league rules have, allegedly, nothing to do with the PLC's administration. The admins will try to sell the club to someone,in theory that should be the end of it. The new owners would then carry on as if nothing had happened. All this is so hypothetical it's untrue.
  14. Ottery writes like David Mitchell, sometimes you think that there's a page or two missing, then you cotton on that that's the way of the yarn.
  15. What motorway ?
  16. It would be ironic if a potential buyer could afford the £ but couldn't raise the £4.60 bus fare to get there.
  17. No, le club est baisé it's a past participle, if we were talking of a female gendered word like L'équipe (the team) it would become baisée.
  18. Baiser-colloquial french for f*ck. Je suis baisé-I am f*cked.
  19. Photocopier needed mending again then.
  20. What's Begbies Traynor's record like. Are they state of the art or the least onerous option??
  21. They talked about breaking their club record transfer of 500K for Dyer, however Martinez said they were in no rush. I doubt that 500K was ever really offered, just talked about.The club said we'd had only ridiculously low offers in January.
  22. When did we start playing in red shorts? bunch of Nancys.
  23. Nothing to do with the 35 million they got in from transfer fees a while back then. We should forget Portsmouth, they are in the premiership and have players worth stacks of cash to bail them out if necessary.
  24. whoever buys the assets of the PLC I guess.
×
×
  • Create New...