Jump to content

Window Cleaner

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31,949
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Window Cleaner

  1. you do wonder if jan is just taking the flack for a failure of a first half of the season and then Wotte will take over afterwards.
  2. He'll need to score at least 10 per game if our centre back pairing is Lancashire and Perry. Scoring is a problem for us, conceding is an even bigger one; Look at our results over the last 5 or 6 years, 1-0 at home and 0-0 away was our stock in trade for points gathering. Our problem is the defence, we can't score and we'll almost always concede, a recipe for disaster if I ever saw one.
  3. But quoting an unverified source is the same as saying it yourself. People make stuff up to suit their point of view, always have, always will.
  4. We're not exactly hyper accountable now are we. Plus they'd have to find all those 'dormant' shareholders to vote on it wouldn't they.I don't expect that to happen frankly, it would be too revealing for some; Status quo.
  5. I don't see what difference it makes to be honest.The club belongs to a certain number of people. If we delist it will still belong to the same people-unless we go into administration,which we probably won't.
  6. Saints had shares before we were a PLC you know. That's how Mr Corbett got his PLC shares, he bought the amount correspondent to the old Ltd company shares. Askham,McMenemy,Everett,Wiseman etc,Bates family-all shareholders in the old Southampton Football Club Ltd.
  7. Maybe, but I still don't see what difference it would make whether they play today or not. Surely Mr Chorley threw enough at him yto pay a couple of Lowian win bonuses. Perhaps there has been dissent in the ranks.
  8. What all of them? Perhaps, who knows.
  9. But why would he suddenly drop Euell,BWP,Perry,Lallana etc right out of the squad and put McClaggon on the bench with Patterson,Mills and Pearce? something isn't right
  10. But if he leaves them out who's left??? There's trouble a t'mill I tell eeee Someone has been sold and everybody is ****ed off. Or they haven't been paid or something like that.
  11. We are probably playing 3 up front, except the dumbasses don't know what they're doing.
  12. Nothing, it's a crap team. McClaggon,Gillett,Smith and Lancashire shouldn't be anywhere near the first team.
  13. Gillett is a total waste of time, if he's getting a game we must be desperate beyond belief. Must be trouble brewing. Admin next week perhaps.
  14. Nobody. Once we go behind we might as well call it a day.
  15. I'm never certain that we'll lose; until we go behind, then nothing is more certain.
  16. What with the bench we've got? His best chance is putting the bench itself on and hoping they all trip over it.
  17. Wright didn't want to stay,well not on a 1 year contract anyway.
  18. True, looks like we've sold half of our team and are just waiting to present the cheques at the bank next Friday.
  19. Would be handy though, what with Charlton and Watford being behind and all;
  20. It's not a case of believing it, he said it back in June. Why? who knows, there was no reason to say it but he did anyway.
  21. Well take it whatever way you want. Richard de Voeux said at the time of the deal happening that it involved "an agreement with Arsenal". He said that,why I have absolutely no idea.
  22. I don't know why you all keep banging on about 1.5 million euros for Morgan; We (probably) haven't paid half of that yet. This deal involves Arsenal in some way, his agent said so at the time it happened.
  23. perhaps they're both right; 160K pro-rata for last season and 340K kicking in this season for keeping us up.
  24. I was glad to see Burley go, thought he should have been sacked very soon after he came. But Gorman and Dodd?? I blame L Crouch wholly and totally for that,unless Lawrie Mac (as was stated at the time) had a hand in it. Know what I reproach them most?? The gutless loss at Bristol Rovers, we were so close to a big pay out which could have turned up trumps for us. I'm not even anti-Crouch, just can't see any rhyme or reason in that decision or the continued employment of Burley when it was obvious that his time was long past.The "execs" didn't want to sack him,they were past caring anyway, should have been Crouch's first job though..
×
×
  • Create New...