shurlock

How about starts?

Might do, though planning to go to New Orleans to watch the Ravens during the week of thanksgiving. Only the Lions-Falcons game looks interesting. Promises to be a shootout.

Thought you would Glasgow.

Might have been, though Jrod basically started up top with Lambo (Jrod actually missed a great chance when we were 1up). Think JWP partnered Davis in the middle - not surprisingly we were outmuscled and overrun. The setup was all wrong. The mood wasn't helped by the locals who decided to play up as we were walking back to the station.

What does that mean?

Silly letter.

Maybe MLG needs to go and correct them on the facts surrounding our administration.

Saw this on their transfer thread. Slightly more balanced.

Never thought that we'd be in this position when he scored his first league goal for us up at Huddersfield - a miserable afternoon and in hindsight pretty poignant given the 'what a waste of money chants' he got from their fans.

Not really - were you there? It's because we decided to spread our legs and play Jrod, Lambert, Ramirez, Lallana in a 4-4-2 with no real grit in midfield (Schneiderlin was out injured) and no apparent instructions for the wide men to cover the fullbacks. It was the one of the most naive team selections NA made in the prem. Never mind that Gazza was in goal. Anyone could have scored against us that day. And they still hoofed it a hell of a lot.

Would be nice for the new manager to cast his eye over him. With Lallana's probable departure, we're going to need two or three AMs.

Against Brazil? The whole side was s***e.

Your next banning. How are you going to bow out -with fireworks or with a whimper?

Welcome back. What's the plan this time around?

Completely different - if Liverpool hadn't got off to such a fast start and end up challenging for the title, the detente between player and club would argubly have fallen apart.

Examples?

Who said we aren't going to spend any money The question is how much. The board emphasised financial difficulties from day one, how what they inherited was unsustainable - this story claims that we are intending to spend more than what was spent under that previous regime. It doesn't take a genius to work out the seeming contradiction. Oh yeh, its the Express, the darn gospel

How about when it appears to fly in the face of what the board has publicly stated

We've been warned of grave financial difficulties -how Nik Nak was developing the footballing equivalent of a crack habit; and now the board is lighting up and wants to outdo him? Either its bol***ks or its financially sustainable. Very odd. Its the express, I wouldnt believe them if they said night follows day.

Anyone-But-Cortese

Being a small fish in the sea never hurt Hodgson's career.

Promising that it says a minimum £50m -the presumption is that it does not include the sales of Shaw, Lallana et al.?

For a scouser, what higher honour is there than playing for the People's Republic of Liverpool?

To be fair, Reed's transfer statement is a bigger joke than Krueger's most recent interview.

Finished 4th the season before that.