Because it’s full of faulty logic, distortions, exaggerations, contradictions and empty emotive rhetoric. Virtually every other sentence is a masterclass in it and I’ve got things to do than point it out, especially when previous efforts to dissect a hatchetjob article or a video have made sod all difference. I’ve found explaining the offside rule to the mrs less painful than explaining the basics of the EU and international trade to some of you
But let’s start with one of her comments: since you claim to be a neutral who has no skin in the game, perhaps, you can explain how she can simultaneously decry Germany’s loss of manufacturing capacity and domestic industry while criticising Germany and EU for not embracing competition enough and not focusing on advancing the single market.
Reconcile that little gem and I might indulge you a bit more pal.