rallyboy

That was an incredible match and victory. As for the women, I've just seen the highlights... During the Hundred and T20 season it became apparent that fielding isn't good enough, simple catches were being put down. This manifested itself in this latest defeat, five dropped catches, at least four of them fairly straightforward. Perhaps instead of having a nice game of football as a warm-up before the match, try a bit of catching practice? Really poor.

She's trying to appeal to the nastiest in society because she doesn't realise that only a small number of voters hate all people on benefits. It's just a repeat of the angry rubbish that saw her party dismantled in the summer.

Being a dirty old perv doesn't get tougher than this...

The media spoonfeeding trivia to simple folk. There's kids being burned in tents, but half of the UK is being distracted by a pointless debate on whether some fat fuck from an advert is a pervert or not.

You lose any final shreds of credibility when you quote the Telegraph - though you lost all of it fucking years ago if you defended lying Boris, the ultra-corrupt ejaculating clown, who was sacked for protecting one of his sex offender friends, between secret meetings with the Russians. He should be in prison.

No need to shout, or use capitals - get one of the carers to help you master your keyboard before you tackle bigboy tax issues. Yes, the typewriter thing, no , it doesn't need a new ribbon....and stop putting Tippex on the screen.

The choice is corruption or hate - presumably they can blend both and learn nothing from the past decade.

42 British servicemen killed by bombs that hit at sea level, a Royal Naval ship sunk. Starmer remembering Falklands veterans and gets the precise form of armament wrong - the bastard. I think I'd rather remember the guys lost than make some cheap jibe about it.

Some of these well-off right wing pensioners have been voting for self harm since 2016, and now they're getting it, they're all fucking moaning. I didn't see them showing this compassion when they were voting for the poor and the disabled to get fucked over. It's the sensible pensioners who need support that I feel sorry for - the other hypocritical Telegraph-reading clowns just need laughing at.

Oh, the little gang assemble again. Get out more, enjoy life, shrug off football disappointments, choose love, be kind, feel better about yourselves. x

You are the current expert on baseless, welcome back - and no, people haven't forgotten what you made up.

Where will you be watching from?, the club asks. Probably from behind the sofa, through my fingers.

Mu Mu.

The Mail dripfeeding lies to the easily-led - firing up the thickos to get upset over an inaccurate story about a place they'd never heard of.

But, but, but they still sung when they were losing, no other fans have ever done that before. Reality has arrived and as suspected, it can be found in Stoke on a Wednesday night.

Now Lammy is thick, but I bet he can spell Israel. Very wise not to attempt Netanyahu, know your limits.

It'll be interesting to see how many extra games Bruno Fernandes gets for chasing after the referee following his dismissal and getting right up in his face. I'm pretty sure it will be zero.

Some people think they can make up any old shit and get away with it.

Yeah, as soon as you apologise.

They were for ten years.

It's not been great optics, taking freebies looks greedy, and triggers the casual observer to wheel out the lazy line, "they're all the same!" Hopefully Starmer's latest clarification will put a stop to it and let them get on with governing. In the meantime, Jenrick is up to his ears in it, again - the bloke stinks of corruption. Stories emerging now that he's taken personal donations from all kinds of companies that barely exist and look like fronts for money laundering. He has much explaining to do.

Considerably more, and the cost of special advisers in the last chaotic year of Johnson was £12.9 million. The real story here is why the fuck are the BBC paying people so much? And secondly, when is Lord Duckhunter going to apologise for getting things so badly wrong?

Lord Duckhunter, where is my defence of Huw Edwards that you allege? My observation was that the pro-Tory Sun delayed release of this important story for at least four weeks and then in standard tabloid style, chose to publish when the pressure on Boris hit its peak. In that news cycle Johnson was being forced by a court to release text messages, under pressure about his daughter's appointment and was being exposed for having protected his friend the MP sex offender, the appalling act that got him sacked. The main media supporter of the government couldn't lead with that, but they had the Edwards story up their sleeve so chose a specific date to release it, a day that very much suited the Tory press office. The Boris storm blew over, and as I suggested, the Sun got back to making up stories about the opposition or immigrants, and spoon-feeding those to the simple. You clearly have no grasp of how the media works in the UK, but you must understand the serious ramifications of labelling someone a paedo supporter on a public forum. You know that you have made a massive error. Now we just need your apology for suggesting that I defended a convicted paedophile.

You can disagree on politics or football or whatever, but today you made up a story that I defended a convicted paedophile and you posted it on a public forum. You need to withdraw that allegation.

You just accused me of defending a paedophile - that's a serious accusation that you need to back up.