dune

Labour never lie, they promised us a referendum and they gave us one.

It is worth a read because the similarities between what it says and the control freak nature of Labour are mindblowingly accurate. And once you've read that move on to this book because if you use your imagination you'll see where Britain is heading. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardians_(novel)

TLS have you ever read Goerge Orwells 1984? If so ask yourself this - is the book more akin to 1984 or today?

Most parents are responsible and look after their children. We're not going to agree on this - you like the nanny state, i believe in freedom and responsibility. Let's just agree to disagree.

I believe n education, i don't believe in child trust funds etc. It's ridiculous and typicial of Labour. Instead of taxing and then giving it back give the public some ****ing respect and don't tax them in the first place. Labour is a control freak party and has created a nanny state. The governments your mother, your father, your auntie, your uncle and your granny with Labour. some ****ing freedom would be nice.

Quality of life has fallen. It's not all about material stuff.

The 80's was a better time than now without a shadow of a doubt. The private sector was thriving, wages were good, there was little political correctness, Britain wasn't governed by Brussels, and the far right were just a fringe because immigration wasn't that big a deal. Britain today is a nanny state, our economy is in dire straits and we're currently living in a bubble of credit that's about to go pop, we're ruled by Brussels, and comunity tensions are getting worse. What Labour has sown this past decade hasn't yet been reaped and only in the years to come will we realise how bad 13 years of Labour has been. No dount the Tories will get the blame (should they win) for making unpopular decisions, but you're going to have to realise that the future will all be about the hangover from the binge.

I'm going for: Share of the Vote Conservative - 39% Labour - 28% Liberal - 23% Seats Conservative - 324 Labour - 237 Liberal - 61 *n.b to calculate your seats use this link http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8609989.stm

Judging by the fact they're now telling voters to vote tactically i'd say they're now on plan z.

Sounds similar to Bethnal Green and Bow & the budget deficit.

I agree entirely, but they chose to copy the simple Obama campaign. I also now notice that "Yes we can" has featured prominently in Nick Smuggs vocabulary...

Nancy Dunn, the American expert on debating technique who advised Barack Obama, has been on hand to offer coaching advice for the past few months http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/election_2010/article7097926.ece

the conservatives have utilised the Obama campaign method and slogan - vote for change. David Cameron has even flown over a coach who i think (could be wrong) was used to coach Obama in what to do in the prime ministerial debates. In 1992 the Republicans copied the methods used by John Majors team. In fact the Conservatives proactively tried to help which caused a bit of grief when Bill Clinton subsequently got elected.

Whatever winning methods the Americans use we follow suit and vice versa.

This is a lie. The evidence of the holocaust was there for all to see. Also i've never said we should have allied ourselves with NAZI Germany, although had Lord halifax became PM this is exactly what we would have done.

I have never ever said that one race is superior to another. I have said that man originated in Africa and over thousands of years migrated and evolved in different parts of the world. You can't say that evolution made the people of South America superior to the peoples of Northern Europe or the peoples of Northern Europe superior to the people that stayed in Africa because the word superior implies better in all respects. It's like saying the animals in the Malagasy Republic are superior to the animals on the African content - it's simply wrong. However based on the Olympics you can say that those who evolved in sub saharan africa are the better long distance runners and have more stamina than northern europeans - particularly those who evolved on the Ethiopean plateau at altitude. Equally for whatever reason the people that evolved in Northern Europe win far more swimming medals - i don't know why. My interest in this subject has nothing to do with race - i'm interested in Charles Darwin and his theories because i'm interested in science in the same way that i'm interested in volcanoes and geography and all the other **** you get on the discovery channel.

I have never spoken about Social Darwinism. I have however spoken about Darwinism.

You said that yesterday.

That would explain why I haven't seen any.

I expect they will be once the results are in.

And just to add that the Tories achieved 43% in 79, 42% in 83, 42% in 87, and 42% in 92. The lefties on here might try to paint a picture of how bad things were in the 80's, but the election results tell a different story.

And what about 79, 83, 87 and 92? I doubt you are even old enough to remember how good things were in the 80's.

The wotsit chant.

Rupert Lowe.

I would assume the message is a reminder of how good things were under Mrs T and an encouragement to vote Conservative. You only have to look to the fact that the Conservatives were in power for 18 years to see what a good party they were then.