Baird of the land

Curious what waffle he'll come up with in the post match interview to justift his barmy choices

We're going for a top 10 collection surely. Thought Villa away under ralph was pathetic.

Why did we only have a go once we were behind. A game we needed to win and we should have played all game like we did in the last 10. Why did the idiot set up completely negative. Why did he exacerbate that with his HT change. Infuriates me that we just ignored Bournemouth's weaknesses.

Pathetic cowardly cretin of a coach. Get him and his turtlenecks out asap.

Why aren't we taking off a defender to make that change

Commentators once again nailing our choices to hit the ball for the little guy to try and head

What is Selles doing. When i said make a change at HT, i didn't mean an extra defender

We're playing longballs to a.armstrong. Idiot selles.

It was the moment a couple of minutes earlier where we were playing long ball up to A.Armstrong with not another saints player within 30 yards of him

Assume JWp was injured (Maybe that explains his crablike approach.

There were a couple of times where there was such obvious 'let someone else deal with it' and it required 19yr old Lacvia to actually take responsibility.

Our best chance according to tv analysts(in a must win home game vs bournemouth) was a scrappy shot from an incredibly acute angle that would have needed an incompetent goalie to get a goal. Changes needed at half time needed

Absolutely pathetic set up from Selles. We're trying to play counter attack at home against one of the other worst teams in the league when we need a win(a darw is zero use)and bournemouth would be contnet with a point. JWP is being utterly negative today, hanging in front of back 4 and passing backwards as soon as he gets the ball (not sure if that is him playing to the managers orders or not) Once again the complete lack of tempo from us is staggering. We're rolling the ball alon backwards without a care as if we were in mid table obscurity.

Are we now switching to 3 at the back

I get bournemouth trying to play counterattack. I just don't get how the idiot Selles can justify us doing that at home in a game we need to win.

We're really missing the lack of ABK's pace or even the missing man Salisu.

Maybe the playbook says don't attack an opposition's weakness

Not surprisingly given the abject lineup we look to have no attacking threat

is ABK injured? When i first saw DCC was playing i assumed it was for Bednarek

You'd also think the miserable conditions might suit playing a target man too.

Fingers crossed sulemana can have impact off the bench that he had as a supersub in the Spurs game.

So Bournemouth are poor aerially apparently so we threaten them with Adam armstrong glad to see dcc starting, hopefully he can have an impact at set pieces onachu not even on the bench for a game that seems most suited to him of the remaining ones.

Not sure I see the sense in throwing Che straight back in from the start given he’s been injured. Start onachu and then use Che from the bench.

The ideal draw happened. Wish i was convinced Saints could take advantage.

I don't really see this idea that Leicester have an easier run in than Leeds.