KelvinsRightGlove

There has never been true communism. Such an oft quoted phrase from all the lefties. Why is that? Is that because they decide they don't like the form it inevitably takes? i.e. a state controlling the distribution of everyone and everything within it, and then are surprised to realise that actually the whole premise is fundamentally flawed. It's funny how all these communist regimes are simply dismissed, as they don't match up to the fantasist ideal Marx dreamed up. Yet if this were such a truly enlightened way, why has it never taken on anywhere? Why have all the disenfranchised masses not risen up and demanded communism some 150 years after it's manifest was printed? Is it because it doesn't work? Or is it because no one actually wants it? You claim my spend more comment is wrong, show me one politician that claims to have a leftist persuasion who right now is not advocating an increase in borrowing and increase in spending? Prove me wrong, and I will apologise and retract the statement. To dismiss me as ill-informed simply because you disagree with me is a bit silly. I have a degree in politics and economics. I have worked for both Labour and the Tories, at national and council level for both sides, in addition to Lib Dem councillors. Further to this I have also worked in the states for both Democrat & Republican politicians, including working personally for Rick Santorum. If you disagree, fair enough. But, I really am not ill-informed.

I wasn't arguing, or jumping in to prove you wrong. I saw a discussion (on a forum, fancy that!), and was just inputting something. Actually asking a question. You were the one that started with the hostile remarks and name calling. Try reel in that ego just for a few moments. Not everyone on here is obsessed with you.

That is what I was saying also, that and a couple of decent performances.

It doesn't prove you right at all. The point was (which as always you managed to miss, spectacularly) that cup runs are ultimately a lottery. Bradford didn't get there by showing great ambition. They raised their game on a couple of occasions against bigger sides. Much like how Wigan's second string have done on a number of occasions against weaker sides, up until the last round. Even then there were some players that were some not regular starters playing against Everton. I know your ego cannot handle the prospect of you being wrong, or you not being the almighty Saints Web warrior leaving everyone crying in your wake. But you are wrong, and no I'm not upset.

Sigh, talks himself in circles then resorts to name calling. As per.

Apparently Wigan being in a Cup Semi Final means they are. So I asked, does that mean Bradford are more ambitious than us also. They reached a Final of a cup competition. So, no I'm not talking boll ocks. Or is it simply that because it makes the basis of your argument weaker than it already is.

Eh? Clearly you have no actual answer. As this simply isn't one.

Does that make Bradford more ambitious also?

A brilliant illustration of my above point are all the lefties that come out with the vile "I'm buying a bottle of champagne the day Margaret Thatcher dies". I studied politics in Leeds, so inevitably there were plenty of people around that would make such comments. It really is a disgusting thing to say about anyone. People talk about her like she was Hitler, or some unhinged dictator, carefully skipping over the fact (a running theme this isn't it?) that she won 3 elections legitimately. I can understand people who may have suffered during this period having strong opinions about her. But the thing that makes it most disgusting is that the majority of people on my course were, inevitably, my age or a year or two old. This means that the majority of students were born around 1987-89 like me (I was born in 89). I know plenty of people that were on my course that say they plan to do this, despite them being about 0-2 years old when she was removed as PM. Sickening. But they are the enlightened ones. Of course.

I really hate the left. I really really do. They walk around with their heads so far up their own arses they have no idea what is going on, or how actually to solve things. Their perennial answer to absolutely everything is spend more, spend more!! Despite the fact half the world spent too long doing just this, and look where it has landed up. These people that claim they are great intellectuals, and sneer at those that disagree with them claim the answer to a debt crisis is....DEBT. It's truly laughable. They purport to be the party of the working man, so elect a man that publicly supports public sector pay freezes, yet also supports rises in benefit payments. They claim they will get to grips with the deficit, by essentially mimicking the way they made the deficit so high. These are also the same people that call anyone that dares to disagree with them as 'nasty'. Yet left-wingers are some of the most nasty vindictive people when it comes to discussing ideas. If you disagree with them, their first response is either "you're a bigot/stupid/nasty" hmmmmm, mature. Boris is oft accused of being a racist for example, usually by those to ignorant to realise he actually has an indian wife - typical behaviour of a racist. They run around with this marxist idea of the a working mans paradise, and how brilliant a thing Communism would be, and how nasty the right-wingers are and how dangerous they are. Casually skimming over the fact way more people have been brutalised and murdered under Communist regimes. They seem to live in some fantasists world where they imagine up some absolute BS - such as 'the spirit of 45' and magically cut out 34 years of history, where things might go against them. They say that anyone 'on the right' has a negative view of society, yet their idea of a perfect society is one in which a massive state lives out our lives for us, telling us what we can and cannot do, when and where, with cameras everywhere and laws stating we must all carry around cards containing all our genetic information. Because we as humans are capable of living our lives on our own (yes, that is a more positive view of humanity isn't it). I really could go on all day. But I should probably do some work. For the sake of balance, the right are just as full of idiots. And no, I am neither Tory nor Labour, nor Lib Dem. However, this left-liberal bigotry that seems to be everywhere right now is sickening. And based on nothing other than lies.

I'd arrange a northern based meet up of TSW folk. We can get our resident Gok Wan (Turkish) on board, and take our Bazza for a shopping trip round Liverpool (my only trip to Liverpool was to see Everton at Goodison - they do have shops there right? I mean they don't all just dip into other peoples bins yeah?). Then to cheer up our Bazza, he always seems ever so upset, I'd take him somewhere fun - maybe somewhere with a kids playground style ball-pool. Who can be upset there? Then to relieve some of the tension, he's such an angry young man, I'd take him to for a Thai massage, obviously with a happy ending. Then to top to top it all off, I'd present the show-stopper. A saints shirt signed by a selection of his favourite players. Gaston, Goooly, D Fox & Gazza. I'm good to you Baz.

It is our beloved Bazza Sanchazza's birthday today. Send him all your loving feelings here. Maybe share how you would spend this special day with him if you could...

Happy Birthday Bazza!

Yeah that sounds aboot right.

Oh Barry, this is such a crock it is untrue. I guarantee you have said we should have taken an approach more like theirs.

You have more than once said we should be more like QPR when it comes to transfers. At least they have been ballsy, I think it was.

Would rather it after the game.

Am I right in thinking he broke some sort of record c.02/03 for most consecutive appearances? Cannae remember if that was for us or league, would assume as an outfield player? Or have I imagined this?

Do we basically buy the team that finished that position the year previously? Should we have bought QPR's first XI from last season? funnily enough, our friend Barry has suggested our transfer policy should be more like theirs. Perhaps this would have placated him?

Japsus?

Yeah, the article gets a bit confused in comparing him to Baines. He (Bridge) was never really getting capped over Baines. That would be silly. LB is just unlucky to have been around at the same time as one of the best left-backs in the world over the past decade (pains me to say that, but he really has been). But Leighton is a class act, streets ahead of Bridgey.

When we start signing worse players than the ones we have been signing. If we want to make Europe, we absolutely should not sign players that have potential to be league winners.

Forgot to add the

Duhhh, signing a new contract is a way of strengthening your bargaining position to get a move away. Just like what Morgan has done. Isn't that right WC?

How you get on my sworn-nemesis?