badgerx16

NETFLIX have stepped in to help save Sesame Street after Trump cut funding to PBS. ( Apparently Elmo's LINKDIN account had posted that he had been "laid off". )

Reeves teasing a trade deal with the Gulf states is next. I wonder how Kemikaze, Nige, and the Heil might respond to that.

I started out thinking "whoever is playing Spurs", but then I had to add "whoever is playing Liverpool, Everton, or Newcastle", and so on. By extrapolation I end up with "none of them" and giving MOTD a miss for a year.

Overpriced

Earlier than that - they still yearn for the Empire.

Maybe they think there are still Japanese soldiers on Kiska and Attu in the Aleutians who don't know the war is over.

Given the local election results, there are probably plenty who would go for that.

Instead we have an hereditary inbred monarch, "chosen and anointed by God".

You both said the deal was a good thing, but look at it from different viewpoints; you from "fixing the mistakes of Brexit", Weston from the "finally delivering what the Tores failed to do". Either way is valid and sees this as a good thing.

There's always somebody having a moan, regardless of the subject. They are probably just bitter because they fell for Boris and Nigel's empty promises.

Fucking rich for Kemikazi to be criticising the fishing deal given the false promises made to that industry during the Brexit campaign, and subsequently ignored, ( because they were based on bollox and could never be delivered ).

Why get aggressive with Weston when he is broadly agreeing with you ?

At least we would get to choose a President.

Poortvliet - 8 wins, 8 draws, 16 defeats, Wotte - 4 wins, 7 draws, 7 defeats, Saints relegated to League 1.

Not sure as to Still's style of football, but Myerscough, where he did his degree course, is our local agricultural college.

Would it be OK to wish death on Putin ?

Nothing was given as Haaland was going away from goal, but surely it should have been at least a free kick for handball.

You always were a cheap date.

Weston's post brought up the supposed tourism benefits of the Royal family, which monies are generated because people want to see the palaces and castles, not because the tourists are going to have tea with Chuck and Camilla. It is not a non-seqitur to point out that you do not need Kings or Queens for palaces and castles to be revenue generators.

This is a thread titled "The small things in life that annoy you". As you asserted above, it isn't complicated.

Why does somebody worth £640M need ANY moiney from the public purse ?

How much tourism revenue is generated by the French or Austrian royal palaces without there being a Royal family ?

People that whinge about people who don't think an hereditary Monarchy is suitable for a modern democratic society.

Too much.