badgerx16

overboard

The player made his own decision, why does it have to be a Les Reed f-up?

Pity the horse didn't kick the idiots passing on it's left, and the ones passing on the right were too close and too fast.

Perhaps you could explain how, in your understanding, Teresa May is going to find the money to deliver the additional NHS money; how much will the 'Brexit dividend' prove to be, ( clue - it won't be £350m per week ), and how much might therefore be left for the tax payer ?

So we won't get back £350m per week will we, we will recover the amount nett of applying the rebate. Therefore, anybody claiming we would be £350m per week 'better off' is lying.

And the £350mill is a complete fabrication.

But the big question is, what is the net amount of 'saving' that is available to spend ? It is almost certainly much less than the £350million per week, taking into account the 'rebate' and payments the UK recieves from the EU, and that basic figure also excludes any potential economic hit consequential to leaving the EU trading bloc.

Well, either she is right or the PM is, and with what has been published/quoted so far, I think it's Mrs May who is playing Pinocchio.

Try not to believe everything that the PM makes up.

Sarah Woolaston MP, ( Conservative ), says that Mrs May is talking "tosh", and the IFS says there will be 'no Brexit dividend'. Even Mrs May hinted that some of the 'extra' money will have to be generated through taxation, and in real terms the 3.4 % is less than the average annual rise that the NHS has historically experienced.

But nontheless, correct.

So basically, like, it's when, you know, people sort of, kinda, you know, basically fail to totally use propa wordz and, like, stuff.

2 items from the BBC earlier this week; "Pound falls on weak economic figures" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-44438838 "Economic growth struggles as manufacturing dips" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-44438839

At last.

Night

I did point out that it was too subtle. GM has an American understanding of irony.

Too subtle.

Even his #2 BFF Putin, ( seeing as Kim seems to be his #1 BFF for now ), says that the US tariffs are actually 'sanctions'.

Trump imposes tarriffs as a sign that he's a 'Big Man', then sulks like a baby and starts slinging playground insults around when everybody else starts retaliating in kind. Q - How many Chapter 11 bankruptcies have his companies applied for ?

Game

Willow

River

Do Trump's trade tarrifs show the way that our post-Brexit deals are likely to end up ? IMO, they show how inflexible the US stance is likely to be, with everything set out strictly on their terms.

Fatigue

Apathy