badgerx16

That can't be a pompey fag packet - it says 'UK Duty Paid'.

Married to a City fan, she still cooked my tea.

Well they are from a Navy town, so some of them must have a bit of 'Jack Tar' in their genes.

Whenever we watch it we have it in German with subtitles. For some reason it just seems right to watch it that way, it's the same with Downfall.

Ask a skate why his girlfriend and he look so alike ?

Saints 3 Citeh 1 WTFILN

As SAF would put it "Southampton are the best team to play at St Mary's this season".

Obviously a training ground move that didn't work 'live'. Don't think we'll see it again.

Think J-Rod paid the price for the Villa dive.

Having watched the game midweek, I 4-1 hold the opinion that that is a very poor imitation of a Brazil team.

is this her ?

Correct- so why spunk away the PPs on players they shouldn't have had instead of making it available to the CVA 9 months ago ? Particularly when for the last few months they've been effectively operating at a loss.

1.3 per game until the end of the season takes us to 41, which should be enough. This was MY point.

But this is not a circumstance that falls within the FL's rules. This is a one-off ruling specific to portsmouth FC - and they cannot continue in admin beyond April 30th.

Yes, but were using the PPs as their guarantee that the money would actually be paid back. If they loosen this security, their risk increases.

I think with the Local Government spending cuts, the Council will need to be very careful how it balances this 'loan' against closing care homes and libraries.

Any team's 'last 3' results could look poor when 2 of them are away, one of them @ OT. In all 3 we didn't play at all badly, and with 'rub of the green' the 2 points could have been 7. I'm confident that the 'last 15' form is indicative of how we are performing.

She lives on SunnyBrook farm.

They have their own special category - they are not so much 'emergency' loans as 'critical on life support' loans.

Presumably that's Southsea Common ?

"In the event the PST bid does not succeed and Portsmouth do not exit administration before the end of the current playing season, the club will lose its membership of the Football League." My reading of this is that whilst the PST ( PDT ? ) are 'preferred' they are the only bunch the FL will deal with. If ( when ? ) that falls through then another bid can be put forward. The only issue with that could be how much time is left before June 30th. How many times can the court hearing be adjourned ?

About as far as I live from her.

Weren't Seymour Pierce asked by Andy Android, as administrator of CSI, to sell PFC at the end of 2011 ? Then there was this last year, : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9367251/Seymour-Pierce-set-to-be-sold-to-former-Soviet-company.html ( Seems to be a familiar theme )