Jump to content

Saint Billy

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    5,687
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Saint Billy

  1. A little harsh don't you think. 1. He is not chairman yet. He is endorsing the pinnacle group 2. What do you want him to do, personally investigate the banks accounts of everyone involved in the pinnacle deal, and has Fry has now since said, there is not an issue of not enough funds. I really find this sudden hint of negativeness against MLT really fecking disgusting.
  2. Jeese, if that was a break what the hell do you do for relaxation?
  3. As in chablis I think!
  4. If thats the bad news roll on the good!
  5. Oh please lay off MLT. If it was proven that he was taken in then so be it, we have all made bad mistakes and his intentions were honourable and are the exact same as ours which is to see saints live another day.
  6. There is a yatching link there! ohhhhhh I can't believe I just said that, I am really sick and tired of having to go down that road again.
  7. Surely he cannot just state that he will accept less, I am sure if the swiss group are intersted there will be a certain amount of bartering on both sides, but you have to have a start point and why not start at the figure pinnacle were or are paying.
  8. Ever thought of working for the samaritans GM?
  9. What I am guessing is that they have a five year plan to get the club back to the prem and then sell it for a handsome profit. The problem is that the Fl are making a 5 year plan highly unlikely especially if they hit us with a -25 and perhaps the investors are not willing to wait that long to get a return and a profit on their investment and will probably suffer a big loss for while. Our only hope is aquiring a buyer who views this as a long term commitment and are willing to even accept a -25 and who are not interested in buying to resale. Long hope I know but maybe the swiss?
  10. Valid point and may well be the crux of the matter.
  11. That'll be the swiss group then.
  12. Trying to gleam some positive out of Fry's statement, at least there will be no further period of exclusivity, so, if the swiss are up for it they can do it straight away. Here's hoping that they have done their homework already and will put pen to paper asap. Other than that I am joining the mass crap in the pants brigade!
  13. The trouble is that everyone on here is fed up with the gambles and shambles past owners of our club have made.
  14. I have the same gut feeling as well, and I have been hitting the bottle just like you.
  15. Bloody hell, Fialka might not even bother if he see's the crap dished out to him on here. Its been mentioned on here that the Swiss group are looking at several clubs and not just saints, so in effect you could be slating the guy, and possibly the one and only guy who could be the difference between us going out of existence or survival.
  16. If that is the case where do we go from here. Pinnacle will not take us on with -25 and nor will anyone else for that matter as that will probably relegate us yet again.
  17. Cheers. I will probably reach 2000 before anything happens:D
  18. Alps, nip over the border and see who it is!
  19. Oh well, I was waiting for takeover day to hit my 1000 posts but I can't wait any longer. Block 5, you don't have to eat your scarf! The wait is all getting a bit bum jangly now and the silence is deafening. I still hold out some hope but it is diminishing by the hour. I still find it hard to believe that Pinnacles backers would be prepared to invest a large wad and then not complete the deal, that is my only hope of it still going through.
  20. SSN must be interesting, no posts for about 4 minutes now.
  21. To be fair though, just like an election poll, take an average viewpoint from a few and you get an overall idea of what the masses think. Spread information to a few and it will feed out quickly.
  22. Still struggling with photoshop 76?
  23. This is not good at all, very worrying and as JustMike mentions it needs to be sorted today. The whole team will disappear if this continues.
  24. Did'nt pinnacle have to sign a confidentiality agreement at the request of the buyer? If that is the case it would be very foolish of pinnacle to disclose whom the buyer is as it would put the whole deal in jeopardy. I find it a little strange that the buyer wants to be unknown at present which seems to add to the growing negative feelings regarding the pinnacle deal, but just maybe there is a really valid reason behind it.
  25. Are my eyebrows in there somewhere!
×
×
  • Create New...