Jump to content

Plastic

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    4256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Plastic

  1. Mane scores http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36999262
  2. It's not a crowd pleaser http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/premier-league-kit-rankings-2016-8494444
  3. Some more solidarity http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36936658
  4. Plastic

    9-3

    Eating out is getting expensive. Every fiver counts.
  5. Interview at Spurs apparently
  6. Unless they spend their time with the national squad signing Liverpool shirts
  7. Just for a bit of balance http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/70000-indian-muslim-clerics-issue-fatwa-against-isis-the-taliban-al-qaida-and-other-terror-groups-a6768191.html?cmpid=facebook-post
  8. http://irishpost.co.uk/irish-boy-8-writes-adorable-letter-football-idol-shane-long-urging-not-leave-favourite-club/
  9. Who's slagging off the forces? I've not seen anything derogatory towards them?
  10. You give the impression that you feel it would be a good thing if the perpetrator were Muslim?
  11. Quite. It costs money to run a site, and if there's enough left from my fiver to buy the owner a beer, then good for him.
  12. Plastic

    Trident

    I can't argue against this point.
  13. Plastic

    Trident

    So they would launch them at us if we didn't have them? That's highly debatable. Japan were pretty much beaten. There is an argument to say the use of nuclear bombs was a demonstration of strength to Russia rather than necessity. The Japanese had been throughly dehumanised in the minds of the allies by this point The concept of a deterrent is not overly complex. If we are not going to use them even if provoked, then what is the point in having them? I think the responsibility associated with killing millions of innocents is what has stayed the hands of those in charge, rather than the thought that the other side may retaliate. I know the canary is left wing, but you have to ask yourselves who benefits from Russia an us spending billions? Turns out its banks and MP's with vested interests. http://www.thecanary.co/2016/07/18/truth-trident-shocking-fact-turn-us-paying-nukes/
  14. Plastic

    Trident

    That's spurious logic
  15. Plastic

    Trident

    I object to nuclear weapons on a moral level. They do not act as a deterrent to most modern threats (fundamentalism, state sponsored terrorism, rogue states), and if, for whatever reason (most likely a computer glitch or radar false-positive) Russia decided to launch nuclear weapons at us, I for one would feel no better about it just because we had the ability to retaliate in kind, and murder tens of thousands of innocent people. I wouldn't want to use them under any circumstance. Who would? Only a monster or a fool imo.
  16. What does 5XL equate to in chest size? 60 odd inches? I'm surprised 5XL fatties have any money left for shirts after stuffing their faces with ginsters.
  17. Jose Fonte is a hero. Cedric is good also, but we all love Jose!
  18. £100 million pounds on Sterling and Stones. £100,000,000... Plus wages...
  19. Plastic

    Euro 2016

    6 for Cedric seems a bit harsh. He played really well. Especially give that Adrien Silva got a 7, and he was poor.
  20. Thanks Pelle, and good luck for the future (not that you'll need it on £125k pw) Not really that bothered, did a good job for us but not that exciting to watch generally. Scored a couple of decent overhead kicks though!
  21. Like this, never heard of him before, but sounds like a talent.
  22. Plastic

    Euro 2016

    Odds were basically 5-1 against a Portugal win before the game which is madness imo. Had a fiver on that
  23. Plastic

    Euro 2016

    Omg
  24. Plastic

    Euro 2016

    I so want Fonte to bury a header in the last minute
×
×
  • Create New...