Jump to content

sadoldgit

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    17,670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sadoldgit

  1. Driving home this afternoon listening to TalkSport and a guy from Paddy Power said that Spuds were 4/7 and virtually just had to turn up to win 😂😂😂😂🤪
  2. I’m surprised that our resident Tory Bot, Delldays/Batman/Alex, isn’t on that list, perhaps on another page?
  3. Thankfully neither do you (of the players too) Delldays/Batman. Still think Pelle was rubbish?
  4. Johnson knew exactly what he was doing when he initially accused Starmer of personally being responsible for the non prosecution of Savile. Mud sticks and that is exactly what has happened. A move straight out of the Trump Book of Slurring Opponents. Some Tory MPs have the decency to see it and call it out for what it is, but it is sickening to see his brown nosers still saying that there is no need to apologise as he has ‘clarified’ his remarks. To also say that yesterdays attack by a mob had nothing to do with Johnson’s remarks is absolute tosh. Why would they suddenly start referencing Savile when it has not been a major current issue until Johnson made it so? It is deflection if the highest order. To borrow a very apt quote “it comes to something when the most embarrassing PM of our time isn’t the one who has fucked a pig”.
  5. You lot? 🙄 It really isn’t difficult. In an ideal world 1) he would have resigned by now or 2) he would be kicked out by his own party. In the event of neither of these things happening it is not the end of the world as his continuing tenure in no 10 will cost the Tories votes and, with any luck, the next election. Once again your attempt to turn an issue into something it isn’t fails miserably.
  6. Don’t hold back Max, tell us what you really think! Sums Johnson up perfectly though. At what point though will enough Tories grow a backbone and kick him out? If they can’t see that he is a liability for the country (and for their own seats come the next election) by now, God help us.
  7. He was Johnson’s boss at The Telegraph and in an article in 2019 had nothing good to say about him and said he would make a terrible PM. He was spot on. He was sacked for making up a story at The Times. He was a shit journalist who made up a load of bs stories about the EU.
  8. Home tie, tick. Avoided a potential banana skin, tick. Not unhappy with this draw and will be delighted if we can knock WH out of the cup.
  9. What has that got to do with players getting injured?
  10. Players can get injured at any time in any game, even in training. Ridiculous to blame the manager.
  11. She was probably the only one not to go to a party (who wants tea when you have suitcases full of wine?)
  12. Wasn’t he on the open market before? 😉 My bro who is a Fulham supporter says that they were arguing about the loan back and when Liverpool finally agreed to it it was too late to get the paperwork through. Why on earth would you leave something so late? Apparently they had been interested in him for a while so it is odd that they didn’t tie up the deal earlier. Still expected to go there in the summer though. Looks like a quality player, shame we didn’t pick him up last season if the rumours that we were interested in him were true. Liverpool seem to have leant their lesson though, cut out the middle man and save yourselves a fortune by buying early.
  13. Why on earth is it going to take up to a year to conclude their investigations by the Met? Sue Gray has done most of the work for them. It’s hardly a murder investigation. Just mostly checking facts which shouldn’t take that long. They didn’t take a year to hand out fixed penalties to all the other who broke the lockdown laws. As for yesterday, if that wasn’t enough to finally bury this imbecile, what is? He has moved past being a national embarrassment and surely even the thickest gammons can see that the Tories are toast electorally if they keep him. Apart from making himself look even more inept, if yesterday did one thing it finally buried the bollocks some right wingers keep peddling about Starmer being responsible for not prosecuting Savile. What an indictment of our archaic system that someone gets thrown out of the chamber for calling out a liar who has just, for the umpteenth time, lied in the chamber (where lying to Parliament is supposed to be a resigning offence). Now we have the prospect of Johnson and Truss dealing with Putin over the Ukraine situation. Dear God. I am not sure what is worse, waking up again to see this lying charlatan still lording it up as PM, the pathetic enablers they wheel out to support him still or the vox pop interviewees they manage to find who still support him. If this is what Britain post Brexit has become, it can f**k right off.
  14. And that is because I assume that the club feel happy at the moment that we have a squad that can compete against the likes of Newcastle. The result is the issue here. We now have the prospect of facing a stronger side and therefore a lesser chance of winning. If we had played them at the time they would have had a much weaker squad and we would have had a greater chance of winning. Once the game was called off we were always going to have a tougher match anyway as they would have a fully fit squad again (probably). We would have done exactly the same as Newcastle had the circumstances been reversed would we not? If not it would have been pretty foolish not to. If the guidelines had been different when we played United you can bet you life the club would have tried to get the game called off. The fact that a transfer window has opened in the meantime is coincidental. The game could well have been rearranged before Newcastle brought any new players in. Having said all of that, aren’t the EPL looking into the situation? Yes, they should have done so before the window opened and made the situation clear, but isn’t it still possible that they will say that newly transferred players will not be eligible for these rearranged games?
  15. Is it though? We have also had the opportunity to strengthen our squad in January. Say we had brought in an upgrade on Forster, Bednarek and Redmond and we’re putting in much better performances. Assuming that the argument isn’t just that the new Newcastle players sit out the rearranged game because it was Newcastle who had the game postponed, how would you feel about us leaving out our new, better players too? There is also the point that we could well have lost against them originally and could well beat their upgraded team instead. As they say, football is a funny old game. If it had been us struggling to get a team out and had the game called off then went a bought a load of new players, how would we feel about not playing them in the rearranged fixture? It isn’t as if they have gone out and bought a load of world class players and are going to suddenly field a top six quality team. There isn’t one player they have bought so far that we need to be afraid of. Frankly I would rather us play (and ideally beat) a strong Newcastle team than quibble over whether it is fair or not that they are now in a position to play us with different players.
  16. My point is what does it matter? The record books and league tables reflect the final score. It makes no difference who scores first does it? Unless your an obsessive for stats. If it was the other way round and Ralph got the most points from a losing position would he be hailed as a hero, or just a manager who was constantly battling back from a losing position and therefore flawed? Each to his own I supposed but if you frequently score in the early stages of the game it is obviously that the other team have a better chance of turning it around does it not?
  17. As opposed to a corner taken and scored by two of their current players? We are playing Newcastle United and need to stop them scoring no matter which names are on the team sheet. What if we signed Messi and Ronaldo in this window? Happy for them to play against Newcastle?
  18. How often do we score early in games? The earlier you score the more time your opposition have to reply. A game last 90 plus minutes, it doesn’t matter when you score so long as you have the most goals when the final whistle blows.
  19. Why would we sell JWP? He has not long signed a long contract and, apparently, we no longer need to seek to buy.
  20. It doesn’t make him some kind of footballing genius. The very person your moniker mocks was lauded as ahead of his time by some further up the food chain and brought in Woodwood to much derision. You don’t seem to rate Ralph very highly. Would you rather have Fat Sam?
  21. He doesn’t have any politics. He just does what he needs to to get what he wants. But then that is a Tory philosophy for you. Look after no 1 and screw everybody else.
  22. Little surprise that you voted for Johnson Duckie. You two are clearly cut from the same cloth. For someone who continued to slag off Butch Wilkins after he passed away for drink driving, your constant support for a congenital liar and your Daily Mail attempts to smear a man who at least has a backbone and a moral compass do you no credit. What happened to your own moral compass? Or is it a case of the further right your politics, the more you turn a blind eye to those you voted in?
  23. You are right. The Italians and many South Americans used to be masters of the dark arts. Remember Alf Ramsey calling the Argentinian’s “animals” in 1966. Diving and other shithousery entered our game when we started to see more foreign imports. Before that teams here just used to kick lumps out of each other but get up, brush themselves down and get on with the game .
  24. Sorry to read about your mother in that earlier post RB. It must be especially sickening for you and all those who have suffered under the lock down. My situation isn’t so bad but I haven’t seen my 3 kids for 2 years. Maybe soon. Anyway, I am sure about a week or so ago when this all kicked off he said he would take full responsibility if there was any wrong doing. Apparently no 10 are now saying that Johnson believes that HE didn’t break any rules. Rules were clearly broken both in his residence and in Whitehall. He is the PM and as such, these people’s boss. The buck stops with him 100%. Why did he not put a stop to it? It happened on his watch. It is his responsibility, but just just watch as he throws others under the bus to save his own flabby arse. The process has already started.
  25. You’d like to think that there was no intention to injure in any attempt to win the ball 😉. There is a difference in deliberately trying to hurt someone and being reckless though. Not that it proves anything but Keith Hackett thought it was a red. It may not be a stitch but if you enlarge the picture it looks like one. Perhaps I need new glasses? I wonder if we would be so forgiving of that tackle if it had been on JWP?
×
×
  • Create New...