sadoldgit

I wish I could agree with you, but these people need to be challenged at every opportunity to stop their ignorant views spreading further. It wasn't that long ago on this thread when some of our more eminent posters were saying that there were no racists on here. At least we have moved past that point. The more we tell people like that that their views are unacceptable the more we will shut them up.

So instead of ignoring him perhaps you should challenge his views instead of mine?

So instead of ignoring him perhaps you should challenge his views instead of mine?

If you have nothing in common with Sour Mash why do you spend more time attacking me than him? As for the whole faith thing, where on earth have you been? There are some on here who use terrorism to put down Islam as a whole. You really need to pay more attention.

If you have nothing in common with Sour Mash why do you spend more time attacking me than him? As for the whole faith thing, where on earth have you been? There are some on here who use terrorism to put down Islam as a whole. You really need to pay more attention.

Making stuff up like your buddy Sour Mash I see. Feel free to quote where I have said people are not allowed to discuss the cause of these attacks without "discussing every other criminal act committed by a non Muslim..." What I am doing is pointing out that there is an obsession on here by some to paint Islam as some kind of evil world and they feel the need to identify every last act on a regular basis, as if we are not aware of them ourselves. Yes, we know, we read the news reports too. **** happens on a daily basis. Some of it is related to religious extremism. Most is not but apparently it is a super big deal for the Islamophobes, so much so that they have to post every last news report to back up there anti Islamic stance. You are no better. Somehow you are an expert on Islam because your wife has an uncle who is a Muslim and that makes your opinion of Islam more valid than mine. You also seem to have a problem with liberals. I'll say it again, the world would be a much better and safer place to live in if more people were liberal and tolerant. You should try it sometime. You might become less of an a**e.

For the last time, feel free to give an example of any anti-Semitic or anti armed forces views that I have expressed. You wont be able to because I have not made any. Why you are obsessed with making things up, only you will know. I guess it goes with the territory.

What I am saying is that why should a Muslim committed crime be worse than a non Muslim crime? We have two people on here in particular who seem to make it their daily business to look through the news reports and copy any containing Muslim related crimes on here. They are usually heralded with the line - just another day in (where ever). The truth of the matter is that you are more likely to be killed by a neighbour than a Muslim terrorist. Women are more likely to be raped or sexually assaulted by a non Muslim yet it is a big deal if a Muslim does the same thing simply because they are a Muslim. I think you will find that murder is murder and rape is rape under the law. There may be different driving forces but to the best of my knowledge, if a Muslim commits a crime it is no worse. If you think that is silly that is a matter for you.

And yesterday a non Muslim cut his partners throat in a car park in Chatham, but these things don't matter because some Muslim wasn't involved.

I wonder, do you and Batman ever take your heads out of your arses long enough to see that there is a lot more going on in the world than this? Just another day with an internet forum right wing bigot. How many murders and rapes do you skip past to find anti Muslim stories?

So then they should be easy to find. Just repeating rubbish ad infinitum does not make it true. I suggest you put up or shut up. We wouldn't want you labelled as a dissembler of the truth would we? Not along with being a racist. By the way, have you gotten round to condemning the act of terrorism at the Finsbury Park mosque yet?

So no examples then. It doesn't work for Trump so why do you think it will work for you? Or is it just some right wing extremist thing that you all use?

Shouldn't be too hard to find examples then. Let's see them.

No I haven't so no need to backtrack. Have you been up to the Bailey to support your mate Darren Osbourne?

Ok I'll bite. Where I have I supported anti-Semitism anywhere let alone in this country? Where have I ever said that British soldiers are on par with terrorists? Were have I ever said that mass rape and sexual assault are normal for a night out in Maidstone? The disturbed world is the world of the far right racist who feels the need to twist things to suit their own warped agenda. If there is one good thing about your extreme agenda, it is that everyone here here can see what an unpleasant individual you are. You condemn yourself every time you post. You stick with the Tommy Robinsons of this world. You are in good company.

Yes I have. But as usual a right wing extremist twists it to his own agenda. You really are a nasty piece of work. It is 2017 yet you seem stuck in some kind of Nazi Germany timewarp from the 30s. Your parents must be very proud of you.

The 1930s called. They want their Blackshirts back.

Nope didn't say that at all. How unlike a far right protagonist to twist something that it isn't. I am saying that there is no difference in innocent people getting killed one way or the other. Or perhaps there is a "less bad" way for an innocent person to lose their life?

Everton when Ron goes to Barca.

Perhaps different people were leaked different names?

I would add the question, how much safer are our streets since the "war on terrorism" was launched?

Either way innocent people die. So my little right wing friend, where were ISIS before the invasion of Iraq?

You don't think that there was any "terror" involved in Operation Desert Storm? Or was the whole "shock and awe" thing just a bit of a laugh? By the way, is your real name Tommy Robinson?

And look what has happened since. Please do not pretend that there is no cause and effect here.

How many people were slaughtered when Iraq was invaded on the premise of having weapons of mass destruction?