sadoldgit

No I don't, you keep repeating but that doesn't make it true. If you cant work out what a figure of speech is that is your problem. I did not accuse Verbal of being an Islamophobe. Feel free to show where I did. Also feel free to show where I am seeing racism/Islamophobia where it does not exist. Believe what you want. Tongue in cheek is not a joke, it is tongue in cheek. If I had meant it was a joke I would have said it was a joke. There is a difference. You aren't very good at this are you? Still waiting for an answer about Sotonians please?

I was responding to Verbal. Where is your evidence that Amaral has done this for the money? You do know if I said that your buddy Hypo would go into one and I would get 20 posts saying where is my proof. Parasite? Being dragged through the court, having his integrity dragged through the mud. Threatened with bankruptcy and in poor health - ching ching????? I guess the two sniffer dogs were in on the scam too? I expect that they got life time supply of Scooby Snacks in payment?

Did you or did you not say that they did not do it?

Dear God. It was a tongue in cheek comment. Are you really that obtuse? By the way, why haven't you posted on this subject on the Sotonians forum if you are so interested in it?

What is this all about???

No mate, I just don't have a clue why you think something is remotely important when it clearly isn't. You really need to stop obsessing about things that aren't worth obsessing about.

"Selfeless seekers of truth?" I see you have dragged in 9/11 although as much as I know it would be great to tie in those pesky Muslims to the disappearance of this little girl I think that is stretching things. No matter what you think of the way that the McCanns have behaved, they have certainly not been 100% honest. There have been many contradictions and much that doesn't add up. Add in that Kate McCann refused to answer 48 questions which you assume would have assisted in the investigation even the most trusting of people must start to think that something is amiss (you might think). The detective who investigated the case (which means that he knows a great deal more about it than you, me, CB Fry and his sidekick Hypocondriac) is a conspiro-nut too I assume?

What???

That would include the detective that investigated the case as well then I assume? And doesn't calling someone a "nut" has a relation to mental health issues??

Look up the word obsessive mate. CB Fry and others have spent a great deal of time defending the McCanns and pouring scorn on anybody who says that they might have something to do with their daughters death (if indeed she is dead). Are you saying that is not the case? I cant be bothered to go and find the post but at one point CB Fry said that they did not do it. Full stop. Are you two related?

"Your allegations" what is that supposed to mean? The detective who investigated the case thinks that the McCann's have covered up their daughters death. Why then is it down to me? I am sure you have seen the documentary about Maddie's disappearance too? I didn't make it.

What on earth are you going on about?

I don't think that anyone is suggesting that she was killed deliberately but having said that, it does happen and there have been a number of cases recently where parents have killed their kids. Because they are a professional, middle class couple they don't seem like the type. But what is the type?

formula

I think there are a few more people than "a few divs on the internet" who think that the McCanns haven't been honest.

Me and quite a few others, including the guy who investigated the case. If you don't think they are squeaky clean why do spend so much time and energy defending them?

One person's witch hunt is another person's quest for the truth.

Would that include two sniffer dogs who had never been wrong before or since? Apparently the only time they have ever "got it wrong! was when working in the McCanns apartment and on their hire car.

There is an awful lot going on in this case. But yes, at the very least you would think that the McCanns would have to face a charge of child neglect. However, friends in high places etc.

And you must have a heart of iron not to sympathise with three little children that were apparently left alone whilst their parents partied. Seriously, do some more research into the case. Just because CB Fry thinks that the McCanns are squeaky clean doesn't mean that there are. If your child goes missing do you do all that you can to help or do you lie and obstruct the police?

"Proper mental". This comment from a guy who got all high and mighty about a remark I made to him which he decided was about mental health issues. Nope, but he isn't a hypocrite, no sir. Box of frogs. This thread shows your true mindset, as does the Paris Massacre one which shows not only that you are a hypocrite, but that you are more bothered about nit picking about what moderates say rather than calling out blatant Islamophobes. You are your buddy both have a strange set of priorities but then that has been well highlighted of late. I think it was perfectly reasonable for an officer to write a book about a case that he clearly has a lot more knowledge about than the internet jockeys on here and is clearly passionate about. A court would appear to agree that he is within his rights to do so. Perhaps instead of making your pathetic jibes you would do better to read it but then you have convinced yourself that a couple who at the very least are guilty of serious child neglect could never, ever do anything like this so any chance of reading the book with an open mind isn't going to happen.

Once again your post follows that of your mentor. You guys are so sweet. Nothing to say about this on Sotonians Hypo? Why would that be? No one else there to back you up?

Financial gain, or to put his case out there perhaps? He was the guy who investigated the case. The ones to gain financially from her "disappearance" so far are the McCanns.

Bloody hell!!!! RIP

h2o