sadoldgit

Good to see today that common sense has prevailed and that Goncalo Amaral has won his appeal against the McCanns libel case against him and that his book can go on sale again. Whatever you think of his findings, he is an experienced police officer who should be allowed to publish his own view of the case. The McCanns have not been charged and his book no more hinders the on-going case than the Tapas buddies who failed to fully co-operate with the police.

So you change a few words in someone else's statement and say happy to help. That is not help, it is just being lazy.

He asked you first

done

Bean

sighted

Well then I am in good company as you have clearly demonstrated that you are a rank hypocrite too. That and you seem to side with the Islamophobes. Anyway, I'll leave you to it as I have got to dig some ivy up and that is far more interesting. Say hi to Hypo for me. Box of frogs and swivel eyes. Classy!

Good for you, doesn't alter the fact that he have avoided answering the same question a number of times and you seem to think it is more important to pick someone up over the number of times they say that not all Muslims are bad rather than pick up blatant Islamophobic posts, a trait you share with your buddy Hypo. Oh, and I would rather be an imbecile than a troll. Ok for you to dish out jibes and refer to people as swivel eyed and "box of frogs" and name call but not ok for others?

Jose and Vic both released form hospital and are ok.

Good for you sweetheart. I haven't pretended you have anything, I just asked the question but feel free to twist my words as you usually do. You seem to be a very different person to the one that posts on Sotonians, just wonder what is going on and why. As for the superior moral compass, you are welcome to your opinion but given some of the sh*t you and your buddy have thrown at me (and others) on this thread and others, there seems to be a bit of pot, kettle, black going on don't you think? Do you really think you are taken seriously mate? As for your buddy, wouldnt you say he is a hypocrite after all that rubbish about running away and not answering questions given the number of times he has dodged a straightforward question about Sour Mash? You don't go after him though do you? It also took you plenty of time to start picking up on the Islamophobes before you started to turn back on the moderates again. You make a good pair and you also are happy to dish it out but cant take it. Before you try and claim any moral high ground I suggest you stop calling people names.

Since when has accusing someone of dribbling accusing them of a disability? People dribble and spit when they rant and rave don't they? The expression box of frogs comes from either crazy as a box of frogs or mad as a box of frogs. When you say box of frogs to someone you are calling them a theatre group are you? Or you are calling them a member of a band? Seriously? As for swivel eyed, as far as I know most peoples eyes do not swivel, the only swivel if they have something wrong with them, which would be a disability would it not? The box of frogs and swivel eyed comments are just a few of the CB Fry jibes used to belittle people and to put people down. So you didn't call me swivel eyed (you have called me plenty of other names) you still used the expression to someone else. Your buddy Hypo, who I have asked if he has issues before, had recently called me an "imbicile." He has called me names several times before and displayed the play ground mentality that you accuse me of, but you never, ever, go after him. But you are quite happy to let someone spout Islamophobic comments all day long. I didn't make fun of him or say that he was a box of frogs or swivel eyed, I asked him straight if he had certain ailments. I asked him because he seems to get himself worked up over things that others don't. Yes, a bit like you. I have worked with people who are on the spectrum and his behaviour is very similar to them. Someone else elsewhere has asked a similar question of him so that makes two of us at least. Anyway, nice effort at diversion. Lets get back to the more important point, your avoidance of the question do you agree with Sour Mash on here or not. You have gone out of your way to avoid the question, something that you call "running away." Why is that? It is not difficult. You agree with him or you don't. And if you don't why do you spend so much time and energy nit picking the posts of those who don't agree with him and let him get away scot free. You may think I am a pompous arse but perhaps you need to take a closer look at yourself. You nit pick, belittle and bully and you have a strange set of priorities. If you are going to apologise to people on here, perhaps you should do so for your trolling tendencies? You dish it out all day long but you can't take it can you?

So long as it is not Draper Tools.

To be fair, you are in a glass house in this instance.

Appropriate user name given the subject matter.

Lets see. So you pick up the likes of Two Pints, CEC and myself yet let Sour Mash and Holepuncture make sweeping derogatory comments about a whole religion and let them go unchallenged. You pick up me for allegedly not answering a question yet don't feel compelled to answer one yourself no matter how many times it has been asked. You call people names and often they are related to their apparent mental state yet pick me up for mentioning dribbling. Interesting set of priorities you have, apart from clearly being a hypocrite. In the world of CB Fry it is a bigger crime to mention a number of times that not all Muslims are terrorists or rapists yet it is fine to make constant Islamophobic remarks. As you would say, classy.

Struggling with 1, 2 or 3? Perhaps we can assume it is no 1 but you don't have the b@lls to say so? By the way, when you accused me of failing to answer a question I was apparently "running away."

Thinking back, didn't you once refer to me as "swivel-eyed?" I am guessing that was not meant as a compliment and seems to have certain mental health connotations does it not? As you seem to be struggling with my question I will help you out. All you have to do is respond with a number that you agree with. Ok? 1. I agree with everything that Sour Mash says about Muslims. 2. I agree with some of the things that Sour Mush says about Muslims. 3. I don't agree with anything that Sour Mush says about Muslims.

So you have to be disabled to dribble? It is a bit rich you calling me malevolent. What is your favourite put down? Crazy as a box of frogs? Classy. Still nothing about Sour Mash?

Hypocondriac

Would he? He seems inconsistent, a bit like Pelle.

Hmmm might carry more weight if it came from anyone but you (disabled? where did that come from?) So still nothing re Sour Mash?

I didn't have a problem with Stek but when Forster returned things improved big time.

And probably dribbling from the corner of your mouth too. Nothing to say to Sour Mash? Thought not.

Yes I do realise that. You are the one getting worked up about needing to do more about terrorism. Are you saying we choose terrorism? Did we chose to be bombed by the IRA as well? You condemn a whole religion just because a small percentage of them choose to murder? There is no choice. This is where we are in the world and just because you don't like Muslims it doesn't mean that they do not have the right to exist. I expect they don't particularly care for people like you either, but they have to put up with you. How do you feel about people who murder, rape and steal but don't have the Muslim label?

I just do it to wind you and your buddy up. By the way, do you have anything to say to Sour Mash or are you okay with that?