sadoldgit

What I understand is that this thread would be half the length without your contributions. You have even done what you accuse me of on another thread and made stuff up. Not once have I said that Maidstone was like Cologne. I don't have a problem with how I come across on this thread because I have said nothing contentious. You on the other hand have followed me around like a bad smell. Why exactly? If you agree that the majority of Muslims and migrants are not a problem, do you feel it necessary to try and pick me up at almost every turn? If you agree with me all you have to say is that you agree with my point but disagree with the way I have made it. But no, you seem obsessed with point scoring to the extent that you even make things up yourself. You said earlier that there were a couple of posts which you thought were racist yet you didn't bother to pick up the posters on the content. Why is that when you have spent so much of your time picking me up on many of my posts? Is my posting style more of an issue for you than someone making racists comments? It would seem so. I asked if you had OCD because I know someone well who behaves like you and they had the condition. I am not trying to be funny but it would explain a lot.

I mentioned it twice because you said I was responding and I pointed out that you didn't either. Pining? Not really. When people send me PMs I write back. You could have done so but didn't. I saw another post from you to someone else saying that you don't respond to PMs so it would appear that I am not the only person that you don't respond to. If Hypo can find two I am sure it isn't beyond you to work it out. I am not running away. I am still here. There is a difference between running away and hiding and choosing not to answer a question. As I said to your buddy, I am not on trial.

mein

chicken

Thanks for the advice Gemmel. I am not sure what I have said here is nonsense but you are entitled to your view and I am sorry if I have wasted so much of your time. Perhaps if Hypo wasn't so obsessive this thread would be half the length but I will put him and Fry back on ignore so perhaps that will help.

Grizzling? You really are a very childish individual aren't you? But it is sweet that you are there for your buddy. As for seeking attention, if I had wanted attention why would I sent him a PM? Yet he chose to make my PM public. Hmmm, who is playing to the gallery here? By the way, replied to Goatbot's post yet? Thought not.

Unfortunately it is much more important than that. It is all about demeaning people and taking the p*ss.

I'm good thank you.

Sadly it would take a hurricane to make mine swing.

If I had posted that there would have been an instant response. What is the expression? Cat got your tongue?

No response Hypo? So unlike you.

Pining for a response? You do have an over inflated sense of your own importance. An apology would have been nice. As for your question, you know as well as I do. Its a shame you don't have the same problem with them that you do with me.

What has this got to do with you?

Not as long as I wait for a response to a PM from you.

There is no way he would make stuff up...oh wait!

I didn't say that yet I am the one who makes things up? Hypocrite.

...

So if I chose to ignore a question I am running away but if you do it somehow is not the same? I see. Yes I could have posted something like that on here but I was trying to save the people who read these threads even more boredom by taking it off thread. What is your problem by the way because most of your posts seem to be concerned with taking the p*ss out of people? Isnt that what is know as trolling? I know a man needs a hobby but surely you can find something better to do with your time? There are plenty of occasions where your name pops up alongside that of Hypos. In fact, if you recall, I did wonder on another thread whether you are both the same person and referred to you as a tag team. I am sure you remember. Because it hasn't happened here recently does mean it hasn't happened. Thanks for pointing out what a question is so succinctly, Perhaps you could explain to Hypo what hyberbole is? You are super clever, as you like to point out by belittling others (you see I am not just a paranoid loon, I also see how you respond to others here). I am sure that you can work it out. Or do you only read selective posts? Even Hypo can work that out so I am sure it cant be too hard for you.

I expect you are right and that many, if not all, would need special care. But there is a big difference in an open door policy and taking care of 3000 children who have lost their parents.

genesis

We do. And one of the biggest wastes of our money are nuclear missiles. Ah well.

Because we are spending a huge amount money on a nuclear deterrent that we will never use and not on helping innocents which will cost peanuts in comparsion. These are children. What are you worried about? That they might be terrorists?

Fulham? Actually forget Fulham. I though they had spent more time in the old Div 1 than they had.

Just on BBC news saying that half of refugees are children. Cameron turns down taking in 3000 children. We don't have the money apparently but are happy to spend money on Trident though.

10 children amongst the dead apparently. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35430667