sadoldgit

Some people find them very attractive.

It would be a start and it would send out quite a big message. And Page 3 is very different to a woman in a lingerie catalogue. That is there to sell underwear. Page 3 is there to give the men some eye candy and sell newspapers.

I am talking about high profile media jobs. I guess the women how SKY employ got there on the basis of their in depth knowledge of professional football

I don't watch SKY sports very often, but all of the women presenters on there seem to be babes. Aren't there any plain, overweight women who could do the job?

Please don't tell me he threw out the picture of the train too?

Or to be more precise, people with guns are the problem.

Can't believe his salary!

Perhaps if people were given jobs based on their ability rather than their looks that would be a start?

I don't know whether he had a low intellect or not, but he certainly displayed many traits of a narcissistic personality disorder.

I just hope it doesn't catch on!

Indeed and we wont know either way until the matter has been investigated properly. But as I say, hardly "tittle tattle." And not the best choice of friends by HRH is it given that we know his pal has been found guilty previously.

HRH is accused of being involved in a sex ring. Hardly "tittle tattle" is it?

That's okay. It is "fashion" so you can show that in a "serious" newspaper. Not a good look is it? Perhaps The Guardian should start its own Page 3 with a todger every day to redress the balance?

Apparently they have found a post script for the original Magna Carter. It says that all of the above are agree as long as members of the Royal Family can continue to sh@g around with impunity for as long as the monarchy stands.

Lighten up dude. The Royals are fair game. I don't think I have laughed so much as when we heard that Charles (our future King god help us) wanted to be a tampon so he could be closer to Camilla! This whist married to someone else. Still, they are Royal so above reproach eh?

dogging

Along with the debate on QT they also discussed the issue on ex Murdoch man Andrew Neils show (wheeling out a very uninspiring topless model with particularly bad skin). On both shows they seemed to get agitated by the fact that the feminists were making a fuss over boobs when there was a far greater issue around female genital mutilation to be discussed. Erm, why not put that on your agendas then and not Page effin 3 guys!!!

Indeed. They do know how to play the game. The biggest two fingers though was when Rupe went all repentant on us and closed down The News of the Screws only to replace it with a Sunday Sun (as if we needed another). Sad state of affairs where that is the biggest selling daily newspaper but then is it really a newspaper? There is very little actual news in it and as we have seen recently the biggest issue seems to be around its use of breasts. Still, as we are in election year I look forward to Sarah from Brighton telling me why she is voting for UKIP whilst getting her baps out for the boys.

I think there is a difference between having a designated spot in the paper every day for boobs and showing them occasionally as the situation arises. Page 3 = boobs. Did you watch last night's debate about it on Question Time? It was hardly riveting stuff, almost as if the panel were embarrassed about discussing something that is well past its sell by date. Still The Sun have got a lot of free publicity out of it and no doubt sales will go up for a bit while we wait to see if the nipples are still there every day.

I think that they would have to probably take some classes and learn how to take their bottoms off as well as their tops.

Toby and Ryan are both loanees so hardly a mass exodus if they don't sign full time.

Isn't North America the "important" bit between South America and Canada?

Now you are just being silly. But be honest. The Don was hardly the Second Coming was he?

I hope we keep Jack but it he decides he wants to play elsewhere I am sure we can replace him.

He is hardly likely to say yep, it is a fair kop. I am guilty as charged. What I find funny is that his ex wife, who was caught out "at it" when married to HRH is coming out saying her ex hubby is totally innocent of all wrong doing. They all seem to think they are immune to public scrutiny. We pay for these people and they are accountable for their behaviour. In the good old days we could remove their heads from their shoulders.