sadoldgit

Good old Rupert! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgr5qvpy2djo.amp

There is nothing depressing about keeping the far right out of power, unless you think that fascism is all fine and dandy.

I guess we will find out just how dangerous socialism is won’t we hypo. As for solving issues like migration, remind us again about the Tory record over the last 14 years please.

Sunak kept that one quiet. https://amp.theguardian.com/law/article/2024/jul/08/labour-expected-to-drop-challenge-to-icc-over-netanyahu-arrest-warrant

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/06/tory-party-leadership-race

I might have spoken too soon again. The Turks seem to have found some more steam.

I might have spoken too soon. Turkey seem to have run out of steam and the Dutch are looking useful.

I’m hoping the Dutch can win this at the moment. Turkey’s attacking energy will see us playing deep for 90 minutes plus again.

We could well fluke our way to the final! Despite so many people saying that Southgate needed to change things up, he stuck to the same formula. He will argue that it has gotten us this far but luck rather than skill and good tactical decisions is responsible for that. Expect more of the same in the semi!

Looking at his demeanour I don’t think that missing ever entered his head!

Toney’s penalty was insane. He was staring at the keeper when he kicked the ball.

The Swiss must be gutted but fair play, those penalty takers were awesome. Southgate’s master plan worked 🤣

We stepped up a gear for the equaliser but have been pedestrian again since. 😏

You are on a roll. Not as good as your Swiss gag though!

I’ll make an exception this time.

We have caused some problems with Saka on the right but have nothing down the left. Why persist with Trippier on the left when he is so right footed?

More on Timpson’s appointment. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp08y5p52e2o.amp

I was just raising the question, not suggesting that we shouldn’t. As you say, it’s a democracy and if enough people vote for candidates standing on a single issue they will get elected under either system. I understand that some PR systems have a % you must reach before you start gaining seats to keep out the fringe elements. Not so democratic of course but still more democratic than our current system. I should add that I support PR in principle. I’d have to see how it would work in practice before I would vote for change. There are still elements of various systems that are problematic but various different systems have various different workarounds. We don’t have to buy one off the shelf, we can get one tailor made, should we so wish. I missed the guy’s name who was talking about PR this morning, but he knew his stuff and was very persuasive. I have little recollection about the previous referendum other than we weren’t offered a proper choice of systems and the whole thing was fudged. At some point in the future it needs to be addressed properly, even if we make the decision to stay as we are. When asked why Labour would bother to engage with the process after winning such a large majority, he pointed out that they rarely win power and, with the way the vote fluctuates, could find themselves back in the political wilderness again after a term or too. PR can provide a more measured response at the polls with fewer wild swings which could protect them from the backlash that the Tories have experienced after a long period in power.

We’ve got to grow the economy somehow!

James Timpson prison minister! Sue Gray has been a busy lady.

They wouldn’t have to worry about targeting winnable seats under PR. There must be a system for by-elections as many countries already use PR. I think there is a different system of dealing with local issues specifically, not being an expert on PR I can’t answer but there was a guy on the radio earlier who had all of the answers. If there was enough support for Pro Gaza across the country they would get seats. It also raises the question of do we want to send people to Parliament on single issues? One of the points he raised struck a chord. Apparently it is estimated that 25% votes cast were tactical votes. In our own poll nearly a third said they were voting tactically. You shouldn’t have to vote to what you don’t want in order to get something you might prefer. With PR there is no need to vote tactically.

You don’t think it worthwhile having a discussion about Sunak’s replacement? Ok. Given your extreme political views it would have been interesting to hear your view, but if you can’t be bothered, so be it. I’m sure you will post an opinion when we know the result though, especially if they choose a raging pinko. 😉

No worries Whelk, if I didn’t go a few days without being abused by you I would worry that something was wrong. 😘 I do take your point though. Yes, it does crop up at every election, probably because the FPTP system is far from ideal. I have heard strong arguments for both over the last few days and can see the case from both sides. What I can’t get my head around is how unbalanced the vote per seat is under FPTP. A consequence of PR is that Reform would have a much greater representation in the Commons, but it we believe in democracy, the seats in Parliament should reflect the votes cast and by extension, the will of the people.

Wow, Starmer is on it from the start. What a refreshing start to a premiership.

Get out of the wrong side of the bed as usual eh Whelk? Look, I started this thread because there had been some discussion about PR on the election thread and I thought it deserved a thread of its own. If you are bored with the subject why bother? Why not toddle off somewhere else and call someone else a c**t? I am sure there are still a few on here you haven’t abused yet.