Jump to content

Bournemouth Fight


Kieran1uk

Recommended Posts

Oh go on then, show us where the 2 commas would go to make perfect sense.

 

The father, who mistakenly claimed a Cherries fan snatched from his 12 year old son a top player’s shirt after it had been handed to the boy after a game against Saints last Sunday, has withdrawn the accusation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, still makes no sense, unless you really think "who mistakenly claimed a Cherries fan snatched from his 12 year old son a top player’s shirt after it had been handed to the boy after a game against Saints last Sunday" does!!! Not sure whether you thought it did or whether you were just trying to put in 2 commas to make it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The father, who mistakenly claimed a Cherries fan snatched from his 12 year old son a top player’s shirt after it had been handed to the boy after a game against Saints last Sunday, has withdrawn the accusation.

 

That's f**king awful -and being partly French I usually love a good subordinate clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The father, who mistakenly claimed a Cherries fan snatched from his 12 year old son a top player’s shirt after it had been handed to the boy after a game against Saints last Sunday, has withdrawn the accusation.

 

Thank you. Though yeah, it's still not the best. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The father, who mistakenly claimed a Cherries fan snatched from his 12 year old son a top player’s shirt after it had been handed to the boy after a game against Saints last Sunday, has withdrawn the accusation.

That makes absolutely no sense as an opening line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes absolutely no sense as an opening line.

 

Agreed, but it works fine as a follow up to some information about the father and his accusation. So what's missing is that information, as this sentence serves as a summary - of information that doesn't actually exist. Nevertheless, it is two commas away from being coherent, which is what I said originally. I made no claims about full disclosure or necessary context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})