The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?

[JohnnyShearer2.0]

23 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a British liberal man.

Pretty certain that CB Fry was referencing GM.

[Gloucester Saint]

31 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a British liberal man.

Not a Starmer or Labour man but that’s as bad as any of Soggy’s posts labelling everyone far right. You’re a cunt for generalising tens of millions of people with crackpot views. You’ve also joined John and your Thailand pervert alter ego on ignore so don’t bother responding.

Edited 3 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[Sir Ralph]

20 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Pretty certain that CB Fry was referencing GM.

Thanks, yes I was aware. CB Fry’s post was unnecessary, hence my twist on it.

[Sir Ralph]

57 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Not a Starmer or Labour man but that’s as bad as any of Soggy’s posts labelling everyone far right. You’re a cunt for generalising tens of millions of people with crackpot views. You’ve also joined John and your Thailand pervert alter ego on ignore so don’t bother responding.

I profusely apologise - I meant “progressive” liberal British man 😂

Edited 2 hours ago by Sir Ralph

[tdmickey3]

22 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Thanks, yes I was aware. CB Fry’s post was unnecessary, hence my twist on it.

Of course you were... 🤡

[Gloucester Saint]

17 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Of course you were... 🤡

Nic/Ralph’s mates aren’t faring too well in Dubai.

Of course they’ll turn down the evacuation plane because it’s organised by a centre left government, paid for by us mugs.

[Farmer Saint]

1 hour ago, Sir Ralph said:

100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a “progressive” British liberal man.

He's talking about GM, not Starmer.

Fucking hell, you piss off for a week and then fuck up as soon as you get back.

[Farmer Saint]

19 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Nic/Ralph’s mates aren’t faring too well in Dubai.

Of course they’ll turn down the evacuation plane because it’s organised by a centre left government, paid for by us mugs.

Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years.

[Gloucester Saint]

3 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years.

Absolutely 💯

[whelk]

5 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years.

Should put them in army barracks until we can clear them as net contributors to the UK economy. Non tax paying influencers funded by UAE spin team not welcome

[AlexLaw76]

55 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years.

Not even treated to a hotel or HMO

[badgerx16]

18 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Not even treated to a hotel or HMO

Only if they come on an RIB.

[rallyboy]

Why don't they just go to the country next door to them?

Stop the planes, we just haven't got any room - unless they have lots of dogs, then we can take them.

Edited 38 minutes ago by rallyboy
woof

[sadoldgit]

3 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Not a Starmer or Labour man but that’s as bad as any of Soggy’s posts labelling everyone far right. You’re a cunt for generalising tens of millions of people with crackpot views. You’ve also joined John and your Thailand pervert alter ego on ignore so don’t bother responding.

Everyone far right? I only label those as far right who spout far right rhetoric or who support those who spout far right rhetoric.

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, sadoldgit said:

Everyone far right? I only label those as far right who spout far right rhetoric or who support those who spout far right rhetoric.

antisemitism is a foundational and persistent element of far-right, neo-Nazi, and white supremacist ideologies. While antisemitism exists across the political spectrum—including the far-left and within certain extremist movements—it is a core component of the far-right worldview

 

Sound like we need to start giving you that label too.

[sadoldgit]

3 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a “progressive” British liberal man.

Both “weak” and “inspiring?” Not sure how that works?

Anyway, standing up to Trump is not being “weak.” Taking decisions which are unpopular is not being “weak.” It has been a long time since we have had a PM that looks like a grown up on the international scene. If you want “weak” people, take a look at Trump and Farage. Anyone who gives in to base instincts is not a strong person. Bullies are not strong. They are weak. The people you support are weak. You are weak. It takes strength to do the right thing. Something you know nothing about.

Edited 16 minutes ago by sadoldgit
Typo