Saints v Sheff Utd - Wednesday 1945

[Osvaldorama]

28 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Yep. If you take out that purple patch in November and extrapolate our PPG from the runs of games either side of it, we would currently be sitting on about 21 points, with only the basket case of Wednesday keeping us off bottom.

That’s absolutely fucking abysmal tbh. 
 

Generally I don’t like fans getting on players backs, as it doesn’t really help.

But this group actually aren’t fit to wear the shirt and I’m glad the fans let them know this weekend. 
 

[Saint_clark]

1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said:

We’d be several points adrift with only Sheff Weds below us by now. Appreciate that the current form is where we’d have landed anyway and relegation looks very likely still without appointing a manager whose balls and voice have dropped. But it wasn’t for that string of victories in November, we’d have been nailed on to join the Owls in L1. 

You literally have no idea how we would be doing now if we'd kept Still. None of us do. I'm willing to bet though that had we kept working on it, we'd have improved steadily and been in a better position than we are now - lest we forget that there were many games where we cut through teams and created dozens of chances but were let down by poor finishing. Then first game after he'd gone, we played shite, created two chances and scored them both. Go figure. 

[Osvaldorama]

1 minute ago, Saint_clark said:

You literally have no idea how we would be doing now if we'd kept Still. None of us do. I'm willing to bet though that had we kept working on it, we'd have improved steadily and been in a better position than we are now - lest we forget that there were many games where we cut through teams and created dozens of chances but were let down by poor finishing. Then first game after he'd gone, we played shite, created two chances and scored them both. Go figure. 

Nah.. not having that. He was horrendous. He’s a big part of the reason we are still this bad. We’d probably be in the relegation zone without the new manager bounce. 
 

Complete lack of fitness and patterns of play. Baffling subs too.  

[saintant]

Just now, Saint_clark said:

You literally have no idea how we would be doing now if we'd kept Still. None of us do. I'm willing to bet though that had we kept working on it, we'd have improved steadily and been in a better position than we are now - lest we forget that there were many games where we cut through teams and created dozens of chances but were let down by poor finishing. Then first game after he'd gone, we played shite, created two chances and scored them both. Go figure. 

I would probably agree with you on two conditions;

1) the players respected him and fought tooth and nail for him.

2) there was no influence from within the club and he was allowed to get on and put his own ideas into practice.

[Gloucester Saint]

25 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

You literally have no idea how we would be doing now if we'd kept Still. None of us do. I'm willing to bet though that had we kept working on it, we'd have improved steadily and been in a better position than we are now - lest we forget that there were many games where we cut through teams and created dozens of chances but were let down by poor finishing. Then first game after he'd gone, we played shite, created two chances and scored them both. Go figure. 

As @saintant posted above, any improvement would have been contingent on the senior players putting some effort (only Scienza was, and Fellows wasn’t even getting a game). Given AA practically admitted that they didn’t for Will afterwards, I’m not convinced.

We were creating a lot more chances but missing them but also conceding horrifically eg Hull away, which has only re-appeared at Boro onwards. He did at least drop Baz and Jack which probably was fuel for more stabbing in the back from the dressing room and Staplewood.

He was still wedded to the same formation and we just went longer without a midfield. Even the wins like Wrexham were a 5 minute purple patch with us very patchy through the other 85. That game could have been 5-5, we had no pattern as a newly relegated side v a newly promoted one.

I liked what he said and clearly capable of independent thought unlike Tonda-bot. But it rarely translated onto the pitch and in our job our size you have to manage or dispatch Martin’s lovers, the rest of the players, the press and upwards with SR. Very challenging and needs a more experienced head who will call Rasmus, Spors and Martin’s core out on poor and slow performance, on the pitch, and in bringing in the much-needed strong and quick spine through the squad. Neither Still nor Tonda have the body of experience to help them deliver that.

 

Edited 5 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[Sheaf Saint]

1 hour ago, Saint_clark said:

You literally have no idea how we would be doing now if we'd kept Still. None of us do. I'm willing to bet though that had we kept working on it, we'd have improved steadily and been in a better position than we are now - lest we forget that there were many games where we cut through teams and created dozens of chances but were let down by poor finishing. Then first game after he'd gone, we played shite, created two chances and scored them both. Go figure. 

I completely disagree. We were going backwards under Still and getting steadily worse, not better. That Blackburn game in particular was without doubt the single worst team performance I've ever watched us attempt. Nobody had the slightest fucking clue what they were supposed to be doing that day. I've seen Sunday league teams still pissed from the night before play with better organisation.

As poor as we have been recently, we're still nowhere near that level of utter shitness yet. We at least look a little more organised now than then. The problem is we're still coughing up easy chances game after game because of individual errors, and we've forgotten where the net is at the other end.

BTW - this is in no way an endorsement of Tonda. I still firmly believe he was a fucking terrible appointment and should never even have been considered, let alone given the job.

[derry]

I see we've employed another bloody analyst. Does nobody believe their eyes any more. What's wrong with us. Simply too much possession, the God of Stupidity. Most of that inflated possession is short passing in our own half. All that does is buy the opposition the time to form their defence, get plenty of players back and have enough bodies to block the bulk of our efforts. Every match its the same. Manning on Saturday made the most decisive pass of his season a perfect through ball to McBurnie for Hull's first goal.

Our defenders stand in their zones and although we outnumber the forwards we are cut apart time after time because nobody is attacking the ball whether on the ground or crosses, Wood trying to grapple an opponent who just jumps and heads the ball in. Too many centre backs, nobody taking responsibility. Full backs who play like wingers don't defend and leave acres of space behind them. Three centre backs who haven't a clue about playing together or attacking crosses. Yet the analytics tell a different story, loads of chances created etc. The analytics bring in Downs etc, Ekhert quotes them as if we were too good to lose, Total Bollocks. 

The best football, is maximum effort, high tempo, constant pressure, quick breaks. We are the opposite and getting the results our play is deserving. 

[rooney]

17 minutes ago, derry said:

 

The best football, is maximum effort, high tempo, constant pressure, quick breaks. We are the opposite and getting the results our play is deserving. 

and some beef with a lot of guts behind it.

[Morse]

Wilder is way to canny to do anything other than have his team press us high up the pitch until the inevitable happens and one of our 'defenders' shits themselves and gives the ball away for 0-1. This may happen a few times so expect 0-3. 

[SWLondon Saint]

7 minutes ago, Morse said:

Wilder is way to canny to do anything other than have his team press us high up the pitch until the inevitable happens and one of our 'defenders' shits themselves and gives the ball away for 0-1. This may happen a few times so expect 0-3. 

We were actually lucky to win 1-2 at theirs under Still so am expecting a revenge win for them, especially as we're so f***ing predictable these days. 

[Harry_SFC]

3 hours ago, saintant said:

I would probably agree with you on two conditions;

1) the players respected him and fought tooth and nail for him.

2) there was no influence from within the club and he was allowed to get on and put his own ideas into practice.

Tbh I don't think these players will fight tooth and nail for anyone (maybe RM). Absolute wankers. 

[SWLondon Saint]

3 hours ago, saintant said:

I would probably agree with you on two conditions;

1) the players respected him and fought tooth and nail for him.

2) there was no influence from within the club and he was allowed to get on and put his own ideas into practice.

Maybe, but that wasn't happening and he'd clearly lost the plot. In his defence I would say he did seem to know what the problem was but I guess he was undermined by 'good bloke' Cap'n Jack and his cronies who clearly WERE the players who went to the board and said we don't trust the manager as was leaked early in the season.

He dropped them and they did him over by going on strike basically. And either he didn't know how to get rid of them or he wasn't allowed to exert authority and kick them down to the U21s. Can't see any other explanation.

[Saint_clark]

3 hours ago, saintant said:

I would probably agree with you on two conditions;

1) the players respected him and fought tooth and nail for him.

 

 

3 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

As @saintant posted above, any improvement would have been contingent on the senior players putting some effort (only Scienza was, and Fellows wasn’t even getting a game). Given AA practically admitted that they didn’t for Will afterwards, I’m not convinced.

 

Again, our senior players are serial losers - we should be backing the manager, not them.

[Gloucester Saint]

21 minutes ago, SWLondon Saint said:

Maybe, but that wasn't happening and he'd clearly lost the plot. In his defence I would say he did seem to know what the problem was but I guess he was undermined by 'good bloke' Cap'n Jack and his cronies who clearly WERE the players who went to the board and said we don't trust the manager as was leaked early in the season.

He dropped them and they did him over by going on strike basically. And either he didn't know how to get rid of them or he wasn't allowed to exert authority and kick them down to the U21s. Can't see any other explanation.

The leak plus AA’s admission makes it clear he was being undermined.

Too much too soon but that squad of players outside of Fellows, Leo, Charles, Jandar, Weligton (as far as we know), Robinson, Peretz and Stewart (when fit), and probably Alex are trouble with a capital T. THB maybe cares a bit more as well.

Not to mention lazy with their Martinball and disinterested in the club’s league position and pride. 

[Gloucester Saint]

6 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

 

Again, our senior players are serial losers - we should be backing the manager, not them.

We agree, 🦆 said earlier that we probably should have backed Juric for longer where the Martin crew played up. But then we might have also have ‘claimed’ Derby’s record. I don’t think they’d have put in at West Ham or v City like they did for Rusk and Lallana.

The players are a disgrace in the main I concur bar the new arrivals and solid people like Bree returning. I think the fans handbrake will come off a bit more after Sunday and they’ll be clear where they stand with us if they aren’t already. 

[Turkish]

2 hours ago, Sheaf Saint said:

I completely disagree. We were going backwards under Still and getting steadily worse, not better. That Blackburn game in particular was without doubt the single worst team performance I've ever watched us attempt. Nobody had the slightest fucking clue what they were supposed to be doing that day. I've seen Sunday league teams still pissed from the night before play with better organisation.

As poor as we have been recently, we're still nowhere near that level of utter shitness yet. We at least look a little more organised now than then. The problem is we're still coughing up easy chances game after game because of individual errors, and we've forgotten where the net is at the other end.

BTW - this is in no way an endorsement of Tonda. I still firmly believe he was a fucking terrible appointment and should never even have been considered, let alone given the job.

Agreed. Those last 25 minutes or so at Blackburn were the worst i've seen. Started off by the completely ridiculous decision to take off Scienza for Stephens, meaning we had 4 centre backs and 6 defenders on the pitch. Within minutes they were level, losing was then inevitable. Completely disorganised, players not sure where they were meant to be or what they were meant to be doing, it was absolutely shambolic and the time i decided that Still wasn't going to cut it.

[notnowcato]

No shiny shits left.  We'll flatter to deceive and lose handsomely to a team with less talent but bigger balls.  Fuck em.

[Football Special]

14 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Agreed. Those last 25 minutes or so at Blackburn were the worst i've seen. Started off by the completely ridiculous decision to take off Scienza for Stephens, meaning we had 4 centre backs and 6 defenders on the pitch. Within minutes they were level, losing was then inevitable. Completely disorganised, players not sure where they were meant to be or what they were meant to be doing, it was absolutely shambolic and the time i decided that Still wasn't going to cut it.

I'd say that abysmal spell at Blackburn was matched by the spell at Middlesbrough where we completely fell apart gifting them 4 goals , it's been a bloody awful season hasn't it 

[Turkish]

2 minutes ago, Football Special said:

I'd say that abysmal spell at Blackburn was matched by the spell at Middlesbrough where we completely fell apart gifting them 4 goals , it's been a bloody awful season hasn't it 

Good shout. Didnt see that one, i was at Blackburn and in a high enough position to see all the complete chaos unfolding. It beggared belief.

[SWLondon Saint]

16 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Agreed. Those last 25 minutes or so at Blackburn were the worst i've seen. Started off by the completely ridiculous decision to take off Scienza for Stephens, meaning we had 4 centre backs and 6 defenders on the pitch. Within minutes they were level, losing was then inevitable. Completely disorganised, players not sure where they were meant to be or what they were meant to be doing, it was absolutely shambolic and the time i decided that Still wasn't going to cut it.

Yep. I'm not unsympathetic to him, given the current slump it's more and more clear our toxic players are the problem, but that was the clear 'losing the plot' moment. Only explanation is he just panicked, thought maybe if he brings the chief shit stirrer on he can calm the pot - but obviously a total failure.

I'd have had more respect for him if after he dropped THB and Stephens if he'd just bombed them, Downes, Manning and Baz out of the squad entirely, played 4-2-3-1 with youngsters on the bench and lived with the consequences, even if he'd gotten the sack after they all went crying to the board.

[saintant]

3 minutes ago, SWLondon Saint said:

Yep. I'm not unsympathetic to him, given the current slump it's more and more clear our toxic players are the problem, but that was the clear 'losing the plot' moment. Only explanation is he just panicked, thought maybe if he brings the chief shit stirrer on he can calm the pot - but obviously a total failure.

I'd have had more respect for him if after he dropped THB and Stephens if he'd just bombed them, Downes, Manning and Baz out of the squad entirely, played 4-2-3-1 with youngsters on the bench and lived with the consequences, even if he'd gotten the sack after they all went crying to the board.

Even if that's what he wanted to do he'd never have been allowed to do it. The clique of players who continue to run things at Staplewood need to be identified and got rid of - I think we know who most of them are. Until Ankersen does that (he's probably the only one who can) and then appoints a respected manager with experience and gives him carte blanche nothing will change. Unfortunately Ankersen will not sort this out because him and his massive ego are a large part of the problem.