Saintsweb characters in the Epstein files

[Tamesaint]

I appreciate that the Epstein files are a serious subject but let's try and take a light hearted view. Apologies to anyone offended. Who on here do you reckon could be named in the Epstein files?? 😁

In my view:

Turkish - as the leading character on the forum with the most ever emojis in the history of the fòrum must be mentioned somewhere. 😁

Lord Duckhunter - as the adjudicator of sixpinters would surely be one of Epstein's mates. Maybe he first met the snapdragon on Epstein Island. 😁

Guided Missile - why he loves Trump and Maga.😁

Alex Law / Batman / Delldays - must have attended Epstein's parties  with his naval chum Prince Andrew . Why else does he keep changing his name? 😁

Soggy - Has met most of the people in the files at dinner parties he has attended . 😁

Any other ideas??? 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited yesterday at 14:47 by Tamesaint

[sadoldgit]

nic would definitely be there as the PR paedophile apologist in chief and make sure that non of the rich people were held accountable.

I think you have the Turkish role wrong though. He would be filming all of the activities from behind the two way mirrors and would be in control of the blackmailing material.

Hypochondriac would be the meet and greet guy at the airport, weeding out the Muslims.

Duckhunter would be in charge of the “chicks” and “birds,” weeding out the 9 pinters and older ones.

Guided Missile would be the official fluffer for the POTUS.

Batman would be in charge of catering.

 

Edited yesterday at 14:55 by sadoldgit

[RedArmy]

1 hour ago, Tamesaint said:

I appreciate that the Epstein files are a serious subject but let's try and take a light hearted view.

 

 

 

 

 

Hahaha yeah what a right old laugh, paedophilia. 
 

Crank. 

[east-stand-nic]

18 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

nic would definitely be there as the PR paedophile apologist in chief and make sure that non of the rich people were held accountable.

I think you have the Turkish role wrong though. He would be filming all of the activities from behind the two way mirrors and would be in control of the blackmailing material.

Hypochondriac would be the meet and greet guy at the airport, weeding out the Muslims.

Duckhunter would be in charge of the “chicks” and “birds,” weeding out the 9 pinters and older ones.

Guided Missile would be the official fluffer for the POTUS.

Batman would be in charge of catering.

 

Obviously you would be Epstein himself being that you apologise and try to justify each Muslim rape incident. I know full well you also thus support marrying 9 year olds as per Islam. So, you are 100% Epstein himself, the ringleader of all padeos. 

[Turkish]

Of all the weird threads that have been on here and there are many this one is something special. Comparing posters to people listed in a peado file is a new low. No surprise to see who the first person to respond was though.  

The suggestion that i would be filming peadophiles from behind a mirror is possibly one of the most vile things i've ever read on here. What an absolute cunt you are @sadoldgit go on, now play the victim again. 

 

Edited 11 hours ago by Turkish

[egg]

31 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Of all the weird threads that have been on here and there are many this one is something special. Comparing posters to people listed in a peado file is a new low. No surprise to see who the first person to respond was though.  

The suggestion that i would be filming peadophiles from behind a mirror is possibly one of the most vile things i've ever read on here. What an absolute cunt you are @sadoldgit go on, now play the victim again. 

 

Yep. Just yep. Very odd. 

[Holmes_and_Watson]

A wholly inappropriate thread. One that unsurprisingly took no time at all to descend into making vile accusations against posters.

 

[Turkish]

23 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

A wholly inappropriate thread. One that unsurprisingly took no time at all to descend into making vile accusations against posters.

 

The OP whilst weird is at least an attempt at humour, not that it makes it any less strange. The second post from the self appointed guardian of morality on this forum is an absolute disgrace and simply highlights what a reprehensible human being he is, people have been banned for less. I’m sure he’ll just ignore it or go into hiding for a few days like the weak coward that he is rather than be a man and apologise

Edited 9 hours ago by Turkish

[skintsaint]

Horrific stuff on here....jeez.

[hypochondriac]

Ffs I sometimes forget we have some proper mongs as fans. Just delete this thread.

[Gloucester Saint]

1 hour ago, Turkish said:

The OP whilst weird is at least an attempt at humour, not that it makes it any less strange. The second post from the self appointed guardian of morality on this forum is an absolute disgrace and simply highlights what a reprehensible human being he is, people have been banned for less. I’m sure he’ll just ignore it or go into hiding for a few days like the weak coward that he is rather than be a man and apologise

Yeah, OP a good poster but got the humour quite misplaced. After that, as Alan Hansen would have said about Saints defending at Goodison Park in 1997, it just gets worse and worse.

One for Lighthouse to do his deletion stuff on.

[Turkish]

18 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Yeah, OP a good poster but got the humour quite misplaced. After that, as Alan Hansen would have said about Saints defending at Goodison Park in 1997, it just gets worse and worse.

One for Lighthouse to do his deletion stuff on.

I'd rather it wasn't deleted. It can stand here to show everyone what a nasty piece of work SOG really is when he whines about being piled on again or when others say to leave off him. Any moral high ground he might have had about laughing emojis is completely gone now too given he was the first to respond and laugh and the OP posting about peaodophiles. As i said earlier im sure he'll just ignore thread or go into hiding for a few days rather than apologies what is, quite frankly, a pretty vulgar post.

[hypochondriac]

22 minutes ago, Turkish said:

I'd rather it wasn't deleted. It can stand here to show everyone what a nasty piece of work SOG really is when he whines about being piled on again or when others say to leave off him. Any moral high ground he might have had about laughing emojis is completely gone now too given he was the first to respond and laugh and the OP posting about peaodophiles. As i said earlier im sure he'll just ignore thread or go into hiding for a few days rather than apologies what is, quite frankly, a pretty vulgar post.

I wouldn't mind so much if it was actually amusing but on top of everything else it's incredibly unfunny.

[egg]

45 minutes ago, Turkish said:

I'd rather it wasn't deleted. It can stand here to show everyone what a nasty piece of work SOG really is when he whines about being piled on again or when others say to leave off him. Any moral high ground he might have had about laughing emojis is completely gone now too given he was the first to respond and laugh and the OP posting about peaodophiles. As i said earlier im sure he'll just ignore thread or go into hiding for a few days rather than apologies what is, quite frankly, a pretty vulgar post.

On balance, I agree. The thread itself is an error of judgement from a decent poster. SoG's contribution was a disgrace though. I've been benevolent and given the bloke the benefit of the doubt at times, but  he's crossed a line here, and I'm not sure he deserves his contribution to do a disappearing act. 

[Gloucester Saint]

57 minutes ago, egg said:

On balance, I agree. The thread itself is an error of judgement from a decent poster. SoG's contribution was a disgrace though. I've been benevolent and given the bloke the benefit of the doubt at times, but  he's crossed a line here, and I'm not sure he deserves his contribution to do a disappearing act. 

Agree. Some really other poor posts on The Lounge recently, John’s (aka Guided Missile) post on the Donald Trump thread about sexual assault being OK if you haven’t seen it, is even worse. I’ve had him on ignore for months but others quoted it. When others who don’t have any control either see it, it just encourages a race to the depths. Nic and his alter egos are really out of control as well.

I don’t want freedom of expression curbed and sharing different perspectives, having banter, debate, those are healthy outlets when life is quite challenging for the vast majority of people (even if Saints have picked up a bit!). But it is getting obsessional, personal, graphic and just plain unpleasant from a very small segment, and I do think some suspensions might clean things up a bit here. 

Edited 6 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[Gloucester Saint]

1 hour ago, Turkish said:

I'd rather it wasn't deleted. It can stand here to show everyone what a nasty piece of work SOG really is when he whines about being piled on again or when others say to leave off him. Any moral high ground he might have had about laughing emojis is completely gone now too given he was the first to respond and laugh and the OP posting about peaodophiles. As i said earlier im sure he'll just ignore thread or go into hiding for a few days rather than apologies what is, quite frankly, a pretty vulgar post.

I agree it was personalised - which he was warned about - and needless and tasteless. If we’re laying into him, then we need to be consistent and say GM’s post was vile and red card material, multiple’s of Nic’s and a few others told to calm it down. 

[egg]

Just now, Gloucester Saint said:

I agree it was personalised - which he was warned about - and needless and tasteless. If we’re laying into him, then we need to be consistent and say GM’s post was vile and red card material, multiple’s of Nic’s and a few others told to calm it down. 

Yep. I've called out Nic and suggested a yellow card previously. I barely bother with anything from GM and hadn't clocked anything naughty from him. Whilst I like light touch moderation, there's a line between light and too light. 

[Gloucester Saint]

12 minutes ago, egg said:

Yep. I've called out Nic and suggested a yellow card previously. I barely bother with anything from GM and hadn't clocked anything naughty from him. Whilst I like light touch moderation, there's a line between light and too light. 

It was on the Donald Trump thread about a day ago saying Trump was right about grabbing women. I have him ignored but it was such a poor post other requoted in anger by other posters hence I saw it. Absolutely vile and he meant it as well, or least through the haze of booze. I don’t like see seeing suspensions and bans but some posters can’t help themselves. The Nic thing was funny for a while but it is getting darker and darker and it can’t be good for that individual to be spewing that much hate on a daily basis. 

Edited 5 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[iansums]

Bloody hell, and I thought I had a weird sense of humour 😲

[Turkish]

1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said:

I agree it was personalised - which he was warned about - and needless and tasteless. If we’re laying into him, then we need to be consistent and say GM’s post was vile and red card material, multiple’s of Nic’s and a few others told to calm it down. 

I don’t take any notice of Nic, he spent years trying to get TUI shut down after he became a laughing stock on there. Same with GM, don’t even read his posts. As for me I speak as I’m spoken too, I’ve had disagreements with many people on here but there mainly respectful and we agree to disagree move onto the next topic. However there are two or three people who seem to be unable to cope with that and launch into strange attacks. This particular occasion is a new low. The silence in response is deafening