rallyboy Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Teamsaint1 said: AI says they had 9 in March 2010, first PL team to go into admin. 10 in Feb 2012 in the championship 10 in April 2013 in L1. But despite this and the gun runner owner, they simply never cheat . My recollection is that Pompey were the only club at that time who didn't have a penalty held over until the next season as they were already relegated. Also, we still await the results of the promised full forensic investigation into their accounts, just after they presented fraudulent paperwork to the High Court. But I wasn't that interested at the time, so I may be wrong. 1
SW5 SAINT Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, EssEffCee said: They got 9 in PL and 10 the year we went up under Adkins. Might have got another 10 in L1 too? They were the only team to get a -10 in EFL after they had already been relegated. I.e they didn’t have to carry it over to the following season in League 2. If they had carried the deduction over to the next season in league 2 they would’ve been relegated to National League or whatever it was called then….. 1
Weston Super Saint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 3 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said: What's a meta for? Measuring?
Window Cleaner Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said: If the outcome is yet to be decided - because they are deliberating and cojitating - then the statement is likely to read : "man turns up for meeting". Cogito, ergo sum.... Unless of course they're "jitating" collectively. Edited 6 hours ago by Window Cleaner
Toussaint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago On 26/09/2026 at 13:53, AlexLaw76 said: That is a football pyramid, right? compare us to Barnet or Bromley and see what is fair and what isn’t. You are correct in describing that as the existing situation, and presumably you are ok with it from your fatalistic response. My issue is that there is now no possibility of any who is not already comfortably sitting at the top of getting there, and is getting more difficult all of the time. It doesn’t any longer seem possible for a well run club to achieve very much at all, take our very own club. Under Lawrie McMenemy we one an fa cup, signed Kevin Keegan, signed a host of other internationals, under Chris Nichol we finished second behind Liverpool. At various times we had players of such I high calibre the calibre of which we will never see again. What I am saying it’s no longer possible for a well run club, with a strong academy, who gets everything right to achieve much at all, because now it’s only about money. 2
Wade Garrett Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I thought our runners up season was under Lawrie. 2
die Mannyschaft Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said: I thought our runners up season was under Lawrie. Correct
Toussaint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said: I thought our runners up season was under Lawrie. Oh well, point remains.
Saint Fan CaM Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Will this thread reach 300 pages? Of course it will and then some. Sadly City debate has taken over even thought there’s a thread specific for that subject. Mods? 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now