Alain Perrin Posted 4 May, 2009 Share Posted 4 May, 2009 Ahhhh, you've gotta love Cher - such natural beauty. As the administration witching hour approaches, has anyone changed their view on it's merits? There were some vocal supporters of administration as a clean broom to get rid of Lowe et al. Now more is known about the process/penalties etc., I'm interested if the sharp end of administration has changed anybody's mind? Put simply would you prefer a relegated Saints, without -10 but with Rupert Lowe, or our current situation? Not meant as a told you so, just interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 4 May, 2009 Share Posted 4 May, 2009 Stupid thread. How can we possibly say before anything has happened? We are still in limbo so it is impossible to say. We are only going to know the answer in about a years time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 4 May, 2009 Share Posted 4 May, 2009 Stupid thread. How can we possibly say before anything has happened? We are still in limbo so it is impossible to say. We are only going to know the answer in about a years time. Why is it a stupid thread? I'd prefer us without a 10 point penalty start to next season, that is something that will happen straight away not in a years time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilchards Posted 4 May, 2009 Share Posted 4 May, 2009 If I could turn back time I would of turned it back to 10 years ago and made sure that I stood on a bridge near the dell and dropped a slab of concrete on this geezer who would be on the back of this bike :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Posted 4 May, 2009 Share Posted 4 May, 2009 Ahhhh, you've gotta love Cher - such natural beauty. As the administration witching hour approaches, has anyone changed their view on it's merits? There were some vocal supporters of administration as a clean broom to get rid of Lowe et al. Now more is known about the process/penalties etc., I'm interested if the sharp end of administration has changed anybody's mind? Put simply would you prefer a relegated Saints, without -10 but with Rupert Lowe, or our current situation? Not meant as a told you so, just interested. You lost all credit about here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 turn it back to 1997 and wish Askham had taken more time in selling the club, in a deal for the benefit of the club rather than for a few ,very few, individuals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 Ahhhh, you've gotta love Cher - such natural beauty. As the administration witching hour approaches, has anyone changed their view on it's merits? There were some vocal supporters of administration as a clean broom to get rid of Lowe et al. Now more is known about the process/penalties etc., I'm interested if the sharp end of administration has changed anybody's mind? Put simply would you prefer a relegated Saints, without -10 but with Rupert Lowe, or our current situation? Not meant as a told you so, just interested. Why is it a straight choice between the two ? If your Messiah hadnt been such a self-opinionated stubborn and arrogant arse, and been truly concerned for the club like he claimed to be, we could have had administration, new owners AND started next season orderly on nil points. Instead, we dont know when we can sell season tickets, the manager (or a new one) cannot start building a team, and there is every chance that we wont get a proper pre-season the longer this mess continues. Lowe knew administration was coming; for reasons only known to him inside that petty pathetic lump of grisle that passes for a brain, he decided, like he did by dragging the EGM out to the last minute in 2006, to settle for doing maximum damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Tender Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 Ahhhh, you've gotta love Cher - such natural beauty. As the administration witching hour approaches, has anyone changed their view on it's merits? There were some vocal supporters of administration as a clean broom to get rid of Lowe et al. Now more is known about the process/penalties etc., I'm interested if the sharp end of administration has changed anybody's mind? Put simply would you prefer a relegated Saints, without -10 but with Rupert Lowe, or our current situation? Not meant as a told you so, just interested. If I could turn back time, I'd strangle Rupert Lowe at birth and Guy Askham too. As for this thread's choice, Hypochondriac is right. As we do not know yet who may or may not take us over, it is utterly pointless having an opinion either way. If you have a penchant to ask retrospective questions, why not speculate on what might have happened had not Askham's board exercised such undue haste to jump into bed with Lowe when there were other consortia waiting to make offers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 addressing the question, personally I am still holding my nerve and hoping that a buyer justifies the pain of the last few weeks. If no buyer appears then maybe I was wrong and we may have been better with a club of some sort (with no unity, fanbase or funding) but at the moment I still feel lucky. I cannot see how we would have had any future as a going concern with the same people making decisions, they had a year back driving the bus and rather than parking it they crashed it through a crocodile of school children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ron fan Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 Why is it a straight choice between the two ? If your Messiah hadnt been such a self-opinionated stubborn and arrogant arse, and been truly concerned for the club like he claimed to be, we could have had administration, new owners AND started next season orderly on nil points. Instead, we dont know when we can sell season tickets, the manager (or a new one) cannot start building a team, and there is every chance that we wont get a proper pre-season the longer this mess continues. Lowe knew administration was coming; for reasons only known to him inside that petty pathetic lump of grisle that passes for a brain, he decided, like he did by dragging the EGM out to the last minute in 2006, to settle for doing maximum damage. Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintDonkey Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 If we get through administration unscathed I will breathe a huge sigh of relief. However the real risk remains that we'll cease to be, or head into the vicious circle of successive administrations that have driven Luton into non-league football. Even if that is avoided we could find ourselves asset stripped and dropping into League 2 as a result of this round of administration. Barring a miracle it could be years before we see any benefit to administration bar the removal of Lowe. For some I know that is enough, I remain unconvinced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 If we get through administration unscathed I will breathe a huge sigh of relief. However the real risk remains that we'll cease to be, or head into the vicious circle of successive administrations that have driven Luton into non-league football. Even if that is avoided we could find ourselves asset stripped and dropping into League 2 as a result of this round of administration. Barring a miracle it could be years before we see any benefit to administration bar the removal of Lowe. For some I know that is enough, I remain unconvinced. I'm honestly struggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintDonkey Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 I'm honestly struggling. What with? Alcoholism? Insomnia? Finances? A crocodile? Lucy Pinder in a vat of porridge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 5 May, 2009 Share Posted 5 May, 2009 Ahhhh, you've gotta love Cher - such natural beauty. It's as natural as Jordan's boobs. Put simply would you prefer a relegated Saints, without -10 but with Rupert Lowe, or our current situation? There never was a choice, so pointless question. However, in a hypothetical world, as I am confident that a resurgent SFC will overcome the penalty and have a successful next season, I would ditch the duck-shooting **** every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now