Not really about your opinion. He plays with our first choice back four in Premier League games when we play our strongest eleven. Objectively he is one of the two best CBs at the club.
Apparently the Bournemouth club historian gave the players a rousing pep talk before kick off today. He told them they might as well throw the game and they had no chance of winning.
If three clubs meet the clause, the player decides. Why would any club pay us more? Not difficult.
Pretty hilarious that you've decided after countless transfers with no release clause, we've definitely got one now and the club have been caught with their pants down and aren't they useless and rubbish and everything. Sack the board.
There might be a bidding war between clubs offering the player different terms, but FF is saying a bidding war could get the club "a lot more", which it won't.
It's easy to deny release clauses when we haven't had one for a single player we've sold over the last three years, and that's a fu ck of a lot of sales.
So, kinda acknowledge that we haven't had them, yeah?
2/10.