CB Fry

Box of frogs.

Clasie has nearly played ten games, nearly, so yeah, let's fu ck him off now as a bad job.

Quite right buddy. Or me. Or something.

Which might suggest that three years might do us lovely.

2000–2001Vitesse 2001–2005Ajax 2005–2006Benfica 2006–2007PSV Eindhoven 2007–2008Valencia 2009AZ 2011–2014Feyenoord 2014–Southampton Not really the track record of a man planning on spending six years here. He won't be staying. I would think he will sign a new, rolling contract in the summer to do one more year but not have a ticking timebomb contract everyone asks him about every five minutes. And then he'll move on in 2017. That will do us, and him, he'll be our longest serving manager for three decades by then. And people as ever reading too much into fairly anodyne quotes. He's not going to stay forever but he's hardly going to say that now. But if it fuels the "we ain't got no ambition" fu ckwits then at least Ron's providing me some forum amusement.

Completely. Of course Leicester will build on their finish and next season will finish higher again, then higher again the next season and then higher and higher and higher for every subsequent season forever. They'll build on the foundations they will. Not like us.

Any news on who the people are that aren't overly bothered by the Ku Klux Klan? Any "proof"/"evidence" whenever you're ready.

Interesting stuff, as ever. I think the point stands that a country where statistically no one is prepared to accept homosexuality in an opinion poll is pretty problematic. The rest of what you say reminds me of Britain in the seventies - a general, latent disapproval/marginalising of homosexuality but still with **** Emery/Kenneth Williams/etc mincing about on the TV.

Leicester are pretty much a shoo-in for seventh - tons of points in the bank. They need 28 points from 23 games to match our 60 from last season, probably enough for 7th. That's 1.2 points per game from now, so their form can drop off a cliff to, say, West Bromwich level and they'd still be 7th. They would have to collapse to relegation form for them to finish as low as, say eighth or ninth. I think it's them for the spare Europa place already (at worst) because I don't think anyone will catch them.

Is this actually true??? Evidence???

You are walking evidence of it.

What survey "again"? The survey I quoted is from a report called "the global divide on homosexuality" by the PEW research centre and is a report based on a survey taken in multiple countries asking Muslims about their views about homosexuality. I've never used it or referenced it ever before on any thread on any topic. So, as usual, more lies from SOG. And as we are talking about embarrassment, I am still waiting for an explanation for your statement that people are "not that bothered" about the Ku Klux Klan. Any chance you are ever going to attempt to explain that pearler? And, lets be clear, the attitude towards homosexuality in, say, Pakistan, is not "extremism", it's normal. If you are saying you abhor that, then great, but it kinda goes against your previous statement that "We all need to accept the diversity and differences in our societies and become more accepting of things we do not understand." SOG - always prepared to get apesh it outraged at percieved homophobia on Saints Web. Blanket homophobia, in somewhere like Pakistan, not so much.

"That's so unfair, Dad."

Box of frogs.

So it's terrorists and then every other Muslim in the world is, you know, just like you, like, really, right? Hilarious you single out this forum as "intolerant". You might remember your own astonishing grandstanding against perceived forum intolerance against homosexuality. I think if you found out that 7% or lower on this forum agreed with the statement that homosexuality should be accepted, I think you'd be on your forum high horse about it, right? Not very "we need to accept the diversity and differences in our societies" is it? So remind me which diversity you are "accepting" today - the 'all religions are as jolly nice as the other' one, or the 'don't stone gays to death' one? So lots if people, millions in fact, think that think homosexuality is a crime punishable by death. You think it is just something we need to "understand" so it's not "them and us". I think otherwise. But that's just me and my intolerance.

Except when he scored 25.

We signed Cedric for half a Shlong and all I can see is people pi ssing and moaning about how we've bought cheap. We buy two players for six million to cover Shane Longs contribution then we're looking at, at best, two players playing 15 games a season, or one covering all of Shane's game time and the other not playing at all. Both of those, as far as I can see, would have people on here wailing about buying too many, too cheap, and also moaning about how these cheap signings are blocking the pathway for our brilliant youngsters.

That'll be a no, then.

Two players from abroad or the lower leagues sounds like the kind of "quantity over quality" stuff that people have been complaining about us doing this weekend as before. Sell Shane Long and replace him with cheap squad filler we can then grumble about because we've just bought too much cheap squad filler.

Apart from the six richest clubs in the land, who would you say is a good cup side?

Isn't that precisely the level of player we should have on the bench as a mid-table/top eight contender? What exactly am I missing here?

"This is for Syria". I could not begin to imagine the absolute glee and excitement from some on this forum if someone did similar but shouted "this is for Jesus".

Jose seems to have completely forgotten to say that we should be blooding our brilliant youngsters. Because that's what's required, right?

He's a young player who needs support. That's what the club is all about and you need to understand that.

But anyway, we should be blooding more youngsters, right?