CB Fry

Currently 4th which if they finish there I'd be happy with that, in that there's no way they'll finish outside the play offs.

Very poor. Shame for our Nige but that is not good enough for a club like Sheffield United and they've spent a few quid too I think. I would think they're not happy down there.

How has JWP's career "stalled"?

Today, Egypt. http://gu.com/p/4ef6n?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tapatalk

He was basically the K Billy Supersound of geopolitical forecasting.

Alpine didn't start this thread, I imagine his son has been on his account again. One single line post and no replies? Nah.

The problem with the survey is shown up by this: "In fact, an earlier poll by the same company carried out in March for Sky News showed that 4.3% of non-Muslims expressed “a lot of sympathy with young Muslims who leave the UK to join fighters in Syria”. Meanwhile, 9.4% expressed “some sympathy”, suggesting that attitudes held by the Muslim and non-Muslim populations are not that different when these questions are asked" So the index of Muslims vs non-muslims on the question is not quite as dramatic as the headlines suggests. "Do you have sympathy" is a awful, vague question and the research agency deserve to be stoned to death for setting it.

Thanks for completely agreeing with me.

Who did he "stick with"? I've given him Chambers, but Shaw clearly was a stand out and would have got game with whoever was the manager. Who else? Happy to say that players we had like Lallana and Morgan all developed under MP but they developed under Pards and Adkins too. Not entirely sure who these players are that MP stuck with are supposed to be.

Poch can be credited with bringing through Chambers but all the others had already established themselves in the first team, or the first team squad.

I accept your apology.

So you haven't found anything then. Thought not. Keep lying.

You can put your own spin on that if you like, but the post a couple of posts later clearly contextualises that one. "Continue to argue" is what you said. So that's kinda more than one post ain't it. Keep lying.

Err, you said this I asked you if religion is just a "convenient excuse" here, what is it an excuse for, what's the real reason they did what they did? Your answer was they are "sociopathic bullies", which while a nice phrase but sounds like the motivation of an one-off nutcase rather than a multinational identifiable organisation but you know best. You can, if you like, explain what the aims of those terrorists were, what they are actually trying to achieve, if the religion element is just a "convenient excuse". I'd say it was pretty central part of it really, and not a "convenient excuse" but that's just me and pretty much every expert on the situation you could think of. Indoctrination and an extreme acceptance of a worldview founded in faith is at the absolute heart of what is going on here. Pretty much the opposite of a "convenient excuse" and the dictionary definition of "total faith". The one (kind of) positive thing I will say about this people is they must really, really believe it. To swish all that faith away as a "convenient excuse" sounds like an utterly bizarre interpretation of what is happening. Anyway, youre the boss. What's the real aim of those people if religion is just a "convenient excuse"? Whenever you're ready. And on world wars you talked about people dying in the name of God. People died for lots of reasons in WW2, "King and Country" as much as anything else, but you're the one trying to link it back with religion. Faith played a part in getting through the war at a human level on all sides but WW2 was not a "religious" war. Anytime you want to accept it wasn't primarily a war about religion the floor is yours. Robert Zimmerman ain't going to help you.

You missed my bingo card comment a couple of posts on then. Pretty obvious what I was doing but hey ho. Here's what you posted. Show me the posts where I said or suggested anything remotely resembling this, let alone "continue to argue it". Just like your total fantasy of your Parkhurst bound homophobic hate crime friends, you're just utterly full of it. Best way to lose a forum reputation as being a fantasist is to stop lying. Just friendly advice.

Who are the "we" that aren't "overly bothered" by the Ku Klux Klan?

Let's remember your position as a total forum bulls hitter. You piped up with this rubbish about me, and have yet to retract it. You spend your time on here deciding what people think and then pompously judging them on it. On this thread you have excelled yourself but you've got form in this area and I expect to see you lying about something else pretty soon. It takes very little grey matter to fabricate someone else's opinion and then deride it, but I can tell you have very little grey matter to use. Keep on lying. Keep on lying.

Yep. I was right. You are dim.

What's my "true mindset" then?

Search: Raoul+Moat+Songs+Of+Praise+huge+fan+of

You ask me a question (which I have no doubt you were jolly proud of) I answer it with an affirmative answer and things are still "anything but clear" to you? I can only conclude you are somewhat dim.

"Siri, did Genghis Khan ever read the Bible?"

I think where I stand on that question is pretty straightforward. What the f uck has that question to do with anything related to this topic? Nothing. It's an irrelevant sideshow question adding nothing to the issue at hand. You and SOGGY (who also, inexplicably, believes "we" are "not that bothered" about the Ku Klux Klan) and other loons desperately trawling Wikipedia for any atrocities/war/death they can pin on Christianity do look like you are having a wonderful time. But what point you are actually trying to make, for what end, I have absolutely no freaking idea. Meanwhile, IS, who are are Islamic fundementalist group, killed a sh it load of people a week ago, have seemingly forced a major European capital into lock down and could possibly strike in London or another British city sometime soon. That's what is happening here in actual planet earth. In the meantime you guys keep trawling Wikipedia. Any of you banged in "How Christian was Pol Pot?" into Google yet? Oh, and for your satisfaction the answer to you utterly retarded fu cking question is No. Obviously fu cking No. Does that stop ISIS being Islamic fundementalists? Does it?

Oh I do love it when you just come out with total porkies. "But despite all this good evidence you continue to argue that one religious group is capable of more violent behaviour than another for some reason". If you can point me in the direction of any post by me on this thread - you can have the other one about the French national anthem too - where I say anything even remotely like that then please do. Please do. Just f ucking fantasy land with you isn't it.