CB Fry

That's one curse broken already. Looking like we should see them both off by 5pm.

In fairness I am being paid by the Government to post on here, specifically to destabilise Pap. Well, I say Government, its just agency work. I guess it's the Government originally. Anyway, it is a nice little sideline for me. Should pay for a family holiday in Croatia next year. And it's looking like it's opened a few doors. Adecco have come back to me with a couple of new job offers. One is hounding out a Jew-conspiracy pro-gun lobby nut from a popular Carp Fishing forum. Decent money, although I need to learn a bit about competition angling first.

Why don't we get those detailed reports of what happened at that Austrian printing company anymore? After all, that was conclusive proof that Katharina was a bumbling clueless idiot who didn't know the first thing about business.

You're not "missing anything". Dont worry, the CPS have no role. The UK and Portuguese forces have been working together and after a lot of time and money the McCanns aren't suspects, much to the fury of the dribblers. And they won't ever be. So the CPS or the Portuguese equivalent won't ever be troubling old K&G anytime soon. In terms of people you can "sort of wonder what their role is", how about "respected former policeman" John Stalker, one of the poster boys of the dribblers' campaign. He's got absolutely nothing to do with anything but SOG on this very thread mentions him as a supporter of his side of the argument. (Anyone who reads what Stalker actually said would know he isn't but hey "I must be missing something", too). So there is plenty of total irrelevance out there, but 99% of it on the dribblers' side.

Fair play, Hypo, that looks like it's a beautiful thing, especially if it has Spectrum games. Does it have Amstrad CPC games? Asking for a friend.

Loads of us spotted it, it was pretty obvious that Adkins knew he wasn't long for the job, and that getting promoted probably wouldn't save him. That bizarre post-match interview combined with the various rumours flying round made the whole thing look like only a matter of time, which it was. Of course MLG and other forum bright sparks happy to dismiss all of it as completely fabricated by lazy lying scumbag journalists. And how right they were.

Are they suspects now? I mean, I'm just ignorant and you work for the CPS and everything, so you must know this stuff. Are they suspects now?

Obviously I am not the only person who think the McCanns have no case to answer. The police (in either country) don't, neither do the CPS. They are not suspects and never will be. The McCann file-ers and the community of airheads perpetuating myths, half truths and fabrication to try and create "things that don't add up" when, in reality, there is nothing apart from lies, noise and hate dressed up as "we want justice for a little girl". Seriously, fu ck off.

I'm not arguing anything. I'm simply talking down to you.

It could have been so different.

There isn't "plenty of evidence", sweetheart. A website created by Internet nutcases primarily is not evidence. Although, to you, no doubt it's a "great resource". Four hours of rambling video created by your hero Richard E Grant is not evidence either. As Gemmel said, if there was enough evidence there would be a trial. There isn't, because they didn't do it.

Let's remember who called who "ignorant" shall we. And let's remember which one of us is fawning over the half-formed, conjecture riddled, sensationalist falsehoods churned out by a fruitcake who thinks 9/11 was faked. Let's remember which one of us has swallowed the "Police dogs are never wrong" horseshi it. Let's remember which one of us watched four freaking hours of it. But yeah, I'm the ignorant one.

Nice. Of course, this information probably isn't on the four hour MegaYouTube so won't count as things that "don't add up" in SOG's little head. http://news.sky.com/story/844071/sniffer-dogs-can-hinder-police-work Maybe our four-hour movie conspiro-loon is working on a five hour documentary claiming that Shannon Matthews is, in fact, dead. Dogs don't lie, after all.

The main thing that "doesn't add up" is the fact these supposed criminals are the ones driving on the investigation into the crime they supposedly committed. Have a ponder on that "not adding up" before you accuse me of ignorance for not watching a pointless video hosted on the website of a fu cking crackpot who thinks the 7/7 bombings were staged. Meanwhile, you carry on your quest for justice for that little girl by watching stuff on Youtube. You're, like, my hero.

Of course it is, dear.

Who on earth would "welcome the Met" if they were "treating them as prime suspects"? Would you "welcome the Met" if you found out they were treating you as a prime suspect for something? So, thanks for a pointless question. But I agree with you on tenuous links. I believe you may have watched four hours worth of it.

You're wasting your time. SOG's reasoning comes straight out of the "Aha! But that's exactly what they want you to believe" school of conspiracy science.

Has it? The McCanns own book released three or four years ago uses the word "disappearance" as the sub heading. Whenever the story is mentioned in the news I hear disappearance spoken not abduction. And even the Wikipedia page is titled "the disappearance of". So The Mirror using a word very commonly used to describe the case, including by the McCanns. Not quite a new "watchword" then. Reality is boring, I know.

That Wales red kit is one of the most forward thinking and revolutionary kits I think I have ever seen, and I imagine the fanbase for the Welsh team in the far east will go through the roof. That's my contribution to the kit thread, see you next year.

If you judge him "purely on goal tally" then he hasn't really got Prem pedigree. It's his all round game/contribution to the team that has got him several big money moves, and is why some managers rate him highly. I agree with those that sayhe's a "moneyball" signing, and he will make a significant contribution this season.

I must be confusing you with someone who singles out one solitary person on a list as a "weak link". Maybe because that is precisely what you did do.

I take this post as a ringing endorsement of the club legend status of Chris Baird and Egil Ostenstad. Well done.

With every single minute of every single match seen by at least three TV cameras, usually many more, and broadcast all around the world, the idea that Saints or any other club can have players that are good enough to play for England but a) don't get picked and b) don't get monitored by bigger clubs is pretty fanciful, basically is not going to happen. So the only way to get your wish is to ensure we only employ mediocre players no one of any consequence would have any interest in. We could be like Burnley, all under the radar. Wouldn't that be brilliant.

Doesn't your list prove that players from any club can play for England? Certainly Saints players can. And I repeat my previous point. All those players went to bigger clubs because they were good enough to play for bigger clubs, and bigger clubs recognised that, and signed them. Those players getting picked for England is another output of them being good enough. Those players did not move on because they got called up. They moved on because they were good enough to move on.

Every single one? You sure? Even excluding MLT you're making an odd point. Those players "get signed up by bigger teams" because they are good enough to play for bigger teams. Them being picked for England is just another obvious effect of being good enough to play for a bigger team. You seem to be hoping none of our players in the future are ever good enough to ever play for England, which to me seems pretty darn mental to me. I want all our English players to get to that standard. Lastly, if Clyne leaves it will be for a significant pay rise and the chance to play European, maybe CL football. Getting England recognition just another possible outcome.