CB Fry

Match Day 2 was the sh it.

Is "tie" an Americanism? They've been saying "ties will be played on the weekend of so-and-so" at the end of the FA Cup draws for as long as I can remember. Which is a reasonably long time.

Ah, okay. Thay pre-dates me. Derby these days is a veritable hot-bed of lovely little pubs and local breweries. Anyone who likes a decent ale should be supporting the efforts of honorary Dutchman Steve McClaren on getting the Rams promoted.

What Pub is that?

Bear, I can probably hook you up. You need an active profile that "the agency" can reach you on. Like LinkedIn. Or, in my case, Grindr.

Google it. The freedom fighting truth seekers are already on the case. I sh it you not. There are videos. "All the hallmarks", apparently. That's the "official narrative" gone for a burton already. What a waste of all that planning and staging and auditions.

Quite. The attacks on the McCanns on here by the likes of SOG have been pretty shameful.

You've found a site where you can perpetuate your hateful lies about the McCanns with like minded liars, then good for you. If it keeps your ill-informed nonsense off this forum then everyone's a winner.

The Sun, The Mirror, The Star and their Sunday equivalents. None of the papers you mention.

They supposedly have lots of good young players (and ex SFC academy bods too) so could be a lovely opportunity for him. Doubt he'll get the chance though.

Let's be honest. It doesn't matter. I am enjoying Spurs and Liverpool losing/not winning but not because of our League position. It's just funny. The rest of it? can't say it bothers me at this point. We're not CL contenders yet. For now, if we win we're third at least. Great. Just keep the run going is all. There are tougher challenges ahead so let's stockpile points now.

Warnock was lucky to get the Palace job. He has no record of success in the top flight at all. He has one more second tier promotion than our Nige, though. But you're right, the only way for Adkins to get a Premier League job is to get promoted into one. Its looking like that isn't going to happen at Reading, but he should get another shot in the second tier if he gets the elbow there. The club he could end up at, and achieve that promotion? Wigan. Watch this space.

I said earlier on in this thread, and elsewhere, countless times, that all I am doing is talking down to you. That's all I do. Well, that and general relentless pi ss taking. I will keep going, I'm sure. Mainly because I am printing it all out and storing them all up to share with my grandchildren. Just need to decide whether to keep them in a foolscap file, or maybe leather bind it all. Is that too much? What are you doing with your stuff?

It's a fair challenge. Just so you know, I am not trying to achieve anything. For me this is little more than playing fruit ninja or chucking birds at pigs or whatever those games are. Line up some conspiracy freedom fighting saps with all their "challenging of official narratives" and I'll do what I can to pi ss all over it. Hose them in it, if I can. Its pointless, but then so is posting up bonkers theories about the Boston bomb attack on this forum.

Lee Rigby not being a set up is not an "official narrative", sweet cheeks. It just wasn't. The Boston Bomb not being a "false flag" is not an "official narrative" either. It just wasn't. As you posted up there is no "official narrative" on Kate and Gerry McCann but there are people on the outer reaches of internet throwing accusations at them, mainly based on lies, misinformation, misquotations and general malevolence. Let's always remember this. You do not challenge "official narratives". You're little more than a harmless fantasist.

Someone posts up info about Kate and Gerry searching for their daughter on the night she went missing and whoosh, SOG is gone. That, and your snide little "you're not a parent, you don't understand" routine has also been trampled into the dust too. You've had an absolute blinder, you really have. Maybe tomorrow you can yet again pretend that John Stalker agrees with you, and maybe yet again post up that interview. We'd all love to see it.

Because I was thoroughly enjoying the inferred moral superiority from you every time you asked the question.

Did you only start believing in conspiracy bulls hit after you had children? Were you normal before?

So you haven't managed to come up with a single reason why the police would say that families of missing children are really not the best people to go out hunting for them? Thought not. Keep thinking sunshine. It might help you make things "add up".

Where on earth have I suggested those three statements are false? I am saying you are pulling them out completely out of context with the outcome of the investigation, as if those three statements have more worth than other inputs into the investigation which you probably find not "interesting reading" because it doesn't suit your angle. This is perpetuating the myths that the McCann websites feed on, slicing and dicing fragments of information to suggest the parents are guilty of something they are not even suspects for anymore. Fair play for reproducing the concluding statement. Its not a satisfactory end to any investigation but regurgitating bits of it to try and bring forth a guilty verdict through the will of a few people on the internet is just a waste of everyone's time.

Yeah, yeah but didn't she look all shifty in that video and that?

Any police force in the world would tell you that in this kind of situation the last people you want traipsing around doing fingertip searches is the parents. For lots of reasons that even me, and I, like, have no empathy whatsoever, can understand. Have a little think yourself why keeping the parents away from the actual physical search is a good idea, and then come back to me.

How did the initial investigation pan out then? Did it end with the McCanns being charged with killing their own child and hiding the body? Or being charged with some other concealment of what they did? Or did it end with them being charged with absolutely nothing at all? For the benefit of the topic, can you remind me? Because, and you know, I don't have any empathy or nothing so just disregard it if you like, but you'd kinda think Joao, Ricardo and Tavares would be the people most driven to land this conviction, wouldn't they? I mean, they're the initial investigating team. So you'd think they investigated, wouldn't you? You know, I lack empathy, but why do people on the internet retreading random statements completely out of context of the entire investigation (where the McCanns are no longer suspects) how does this move the investigation on? What have you seen with your expert eye here that Jaoa, Ricardo and Tavares have missed? PS - don't get SOG to read the statements for you. He still thinks John Stalker thinks they dun it.

You didn't read the explanation on this very thread that says that this clearly refers to the fact they were all getting pis sed up with no adequate childcare. It was on this thread. In the last couple of days. Remember?

I'll stay on topic. The McCanns will never be found guilty of harming/hiding/covering up their own child. They won't. I don't care what four hours of Internet conspiro-bol locks from a fruitcake says. There's the topic. Do us a favour, get your little numbered self help book out. I love that. Your best weapon against howwible people who don't really like it when people spout lies about Lee Rigby, 7/7 or in this case. Cause you guys are the truth hunters aintcha? The heroes? The seeers? And we ruin your fun with, like, facts and stuff. Soz and that. Go on, get your numbered list out.