CB Fry

In fairness, he's never claimed to take the training sessions. That's why he has his mini army of acolytes like Bond and Jordan, now with added Hoddle.

Remind us of the role Clive Woodward played in our relegation from the top flight, won't you?

Graham Poll doesn't address the match referee in that article, he addresses Jonathan Pearce, the match commentator over his poor grasp of the laws of the game. It's equally "easy to ruminate" over articles you don't seem to have actually read. And secondly, you expect consideration for Mariner because of the "speed of the event in real time" but castigate Graham Poll because he wasn't "correct in every decision he made" even though though the decisions would have also been made at similarly high speed "real time" situations. Right you are then. It clearly should have been a pen, we got lucky. And we would have still won anyway.

I like it when Pap gets his self-help book out, with its lickle numbered sections and everything. That's when you know he's really on the front foot.

If there's one thing Pap swears by, it's evidence.

More comedy gold.

This is pretty much the size of it.

As a parent, if I was being accused of being involved in my own daughters abduction and/or death, I would take legal advice and if that advice told me to not answer questions I would do just that.

They're going on trial for what, exactly? Not sure that "Knowing more than they are letting on" is not, in itself, something you can go on trial for. Of course I don't work for the CPS like SOG does so what do I know? All this evidence we apparently have points to what exactly?

I think I direct my derision at the bright sparks droning on about cadaver dogs etc suggesting at least one of K or G know for a fact she's dead.

In fairness he left in the bit about Stalker saying he thinks the child was abducted. Which is kinda what the McCanns think. But SOG in his world of "things that don't add up" skimmed over that bit.

They are not suspects now. They won't be in a years time, or in five years time. You and your little scumbag community can carry on spreading lies, misquotations and general hate about them, but none of it will change that fact. And please do point me in the direction of a quote from me about my opinion of how and why they left their children that night for you to come to you little conclusion I have "no problem with it". But that's how you work, isn't it? A lie, an assumption, a judgement. Based on f uck all. Yeah, carry on. Call me objectionable. I see what you do and need no approval from your sort.

He'll know what to say then.

Hilarious, I'm sure.

And it does do that, as its support of the FL (vs the woeful ITV era) and its noble if possibly misguided trumpeting of the Women's game also does. There is a Daily Mail-esque train of thought of that's all the BBC should do, showing the sh it no one else wants to. Well, its boll ocks. One of the three Reithian principles was "to entertain". The BBC cover the Premier League perfectlying well, the coverage of the bigger clubs reflect the interest level in those clubs. The fact is, no one apart from West Brom fans really care about watching huge swathes of coverage about West Brom. Let's keep an eye on this forum. Specifically the non Saints football threads. Let's see, over the next month, how many get started about the CL teams/top 6. And how many get started Alan Irvine's team selection, or San Dyche's post match comments. I expect, this forum's very own Angelman, with his aching need to see coverage of a wider spread of clubs, will take the lead on this.

Never stops being hilarious, does it? You really am so funny.

The BBC are a public service broadcaster. Covering the clubs people are interested in - the bigger clubs - fills that remit. Let's not pretend the the wider public are interested in seeing "a much wider focus on clubs". I'd suggest you're not either. It's just a euphemism for "Put my club on more, put my club on more". Or are you desperate to watch Peterborough vs Barnsley for twenty minutes at 10:30pm on Saturday Night, with big old horrible Premier League clubs like, say, Southampton pushed back to three minutes at midnight? I mean, it's only fair innit?

The next time we're on MOTD first in a couple of months time will be the first time I can ever remember us being on MOTD first I can tell you.

Jonathan Pearce ruined it by saying our 6-3 Man U win was the Grey Shirt match. Wally. Apart from that, just lovely to watch. Effing brilliant.

Are you twelve years old?

It's very satisfying, when in a pessimistic moment where I worry what would happen to our team if one of our key players got injured, to remember that one of our key players IS currently injured and we're doing effing great anyway. But the point is, Jay Rod will come back just in time to cover African Cup of Nations and/or inevitable injury or loss of form to someone else. Basically what I am saying is we're nailed on fourth place.

We were always going to be. We won 8 flipping nil.

I do hope SaintRichmond got his refund on his season ticket. He was conned, I tell you. Conned.

It's just like watching Dagenham and Redbridge.

That's one curse broken already. Looking like we should see them both off by 5pm.