CB Fry

Of course, this story is absolutely nothing like that. But then you knew that. Troll.

They're red FFS. Don't you know anything?

This is the kind of thing we should be doing in the Saints Megastore in Tokyo, not in effing Fordingbridge. Pointless.

These signs have been specifically designed to help us crack the Asian market IMO.

I think that is known as "getting on with the rest of your life".

Correct. A red and white kit would get some debate around "don't like the collar" and so on, but the vast majority would be positive to non plussed. This isn't the case here obviously.

I'm not getting worked up. Just laughing at you. Great FACTS. Well done.

I do wonder where the "why aren't the shorts blue, our traditional short colour is blue, you know the famous Saints blue shorts, you think Saints and you think blue shorts, why aren't they on this kit" brigade have appeared from. Season after season, year after year. From Hummel to Admiral to Pony to the Lowe years to Umbro. Never mentioned. Not once. Funny now people suddenly engineering a "tradition" that we are city and world renowned for wearing blue shorts. Funny, aint it?

I agree with your general point but I would be surprised if we spend, say, eight million on a full back. We might just have to settle for back ups in those spots.

And Middlesborough got relegated with them in the team. Great example.

People should not delude themselves that people buying a new home kit means they actually like it. We've got a geezer running a protest page on facebook who already said he's buying one. And I think you'll find no one on this forum has said we won't sell many. Obviously we will, but we would for any design.

Thanks for replying to a post only twelve months after I made it.

But you will be encouraging your facebook friends to buy the new kit as you don't want to damage the club right? Maybe encourage your facebookers to post photos of them in their newly bought shirts on your page: this will reassure you and the club that SFC will not be damaged by this protest. Obviously start with a pic of yourself in it. Or even better a picture of you thumbs-upping in the queue to the megastore.

Are you berating those not buying it because they are "damaging the club"....? I've been struggling to keep up with your principled protest of buying the kit you are protesting against.

You still peddling this guff? Stick to the computer games kiddo.

If we'd stuck with stripes we'd be looking forward to playing the likes of Leyton Orient and MK Dons next season. Thank christ for a chairman with vision.

I thought you weren't bothered about our kit or anyone else's kit?

But they were stripes. Only the "shoulders" one wasn't. And small matter of black shorts, usually white socks on all of those kits. And the 80s was mental kits agogo for all teams. Not the case now.

Or, people aren't actually raging that much. It's a football shirt. Which happens to be absolute horseplop. It's funnier that people can't express that without the likes of you working it up into something it ain't.

That second hummel one wasn't tacky. And Hummel didn't do the Blue Flame kit.

The thing I don't get is why Alpine "utterly destested" the second Hummel kit which was, err, red and white stripes and black shorts and white socks. He am cuckoo.

...are irrelevent.

Bryon burger is not "posh".

Delldays officially "not bothered" about stadium name change from St Mary's to Paedoland.