CB Fry

Right on. Don't watch the Ashes. At all. That's the only way Bransgrove (or should I say PAULSgrove) is going to learn.

Say we spend £30m on five new players this summer and not one of them plays a single minute of a single match until February. Would that still "make sense" to you?

Why would GWC write a "historical Saints" article about Harlee Dean or Ben Reeves? I vote Colleter. Really liked him for some reason. Just a bit nuts.

That's right. It's me who is bitter and unfunny. Coming from a man who won't stop bleating about how Pompey have "got away with it". And, only the other day was prattling on about how "this is a womans world". Yeah. Definitely me what's bitter.

Our season ticket blurb is as much platitude-heavy meaningless garbage as anything on the Reading mail-out. Reading's is better as at least it feels personal.

Classic OldNick garbage there. He's funding the Skates! He's funding the Skates! In other news, no he isn't.

There's blood all over his hands.

I think it's fine. Well done Nige.

Or, in the real world, Chelsea would like to sign Luke Shaw.

Just think, they'll be a whole new human tragedy along some time in the next few weeks, maybe even tomorrow. And we can start all over again. First you can pretend it didn't really happen. And then you can pretend you never really said it didn't really happen. Meanwhile, real people will be mourning dead relatives while you crack one out over them being crisis actors. Now that is jolly exciting for you, isn't it? PS: DO NOT GO NEAR CANARY WHARF ON THURSDAY.

You won't last long here. Journalists make it all up. They make it all up I tells ya.

But what does happen is you taking a groundless rumour in the Sun as proof that all the other stories in the papers were groundless rumours. You really couldn't make that up.

Surely one of the forum comedians will write one of those hilarious skits based on a conversation between a lazy journo and his editor. I love them - that magic combination of being uproariously funny along with being razor-sharp accurate about how journalists, like, make everything up out of thin air. Here's an opening line to start you off, but the real forum wags can finish it... "Hey boss, I'm so bored now the season is over and we can't hack phones no more so I thought I would make up a story. You know, like we always do. I hate Southampton but lets do one on them" [......]

You posed the question "where's the blood, Bazzer" underneath a picture of a man with blood all over his hands. a) you can't pose that question without a theory - because it is a picture of a man with blood all over his hands. No theory, no question. b) Asking "where's the blood" underneath a picture of a man with blood all over his hands I think qualifies you as being a "wilful contrarian" who is"over stretching" himself. It definitely qualifies you as being a bit thick. Keep stretching, Pap. Keep stretching. PS. The answer to the question is "on his hands". The blood is on his hands. That's where the blood is. On his hands.

Why ask the question "where's the blood, Bazzer?" I think I have a better grasp of what a theory is than you do. It aint, obviously, just you saying "hey everyone, here's my theory". Life is not a black and white as you try and make it. Why did you ask "Where's the blood, Bazzer?"

Intrinsic to the utter horseplop you have posted on this thread is the theory that the events in Woolwich were not "real". So don't pretend you haven't put forward a theory. You have. "Where's the blood Bazzer?" is a theory my old son. It's in the question that normal people never ever needed to ask. You deciding you have "no explanation" for a why a man being murdered in the street is not real to you is a theory. So good try but this thread is stuffed to the gills with your implied theories. Couldn't be arsed to dig up loads mote of quotes from you on here but there's plenty.

Where did it break several months ago? Pretty sure it wouldn't have passed me by if it was in the papers/TV.

A blogger called Broker Man Daniel has come out with it good and proper. So anyone who doesn't already know, its there. I won't link it but "downing street affair" in twitter will get you there. Great story, will be in the Guardian/Telegraph by the weekend at the latest.

That's easily in the top sixteen things I have ever seen on the internet. Just brilliant. Needless to say Pap, I'm now convinced. I hope they give Drummer Rigby's widow a gig on Holby or something when this dies down. Or maybe an honourary BAFTA. What an actress.

Face on stamp on the back of being the first major black player (ie more famous/exciting than Viv Anderson).

Hedgehog Gutter Brush breaking South America I see.

He was good when he came off the bench v Argies in 1986. Other than that pretty appalling for England.

But he would have been in some of the meetings, though? Because to organise the mass murder of hundreds of New Yorkers there would have been, what, six or seven meetings? And even as a blundering moron, you'd think he would use his position as a figurehead to express a reservation or two. But ultimately the Neo Cons won the day. High fives all round. The Pres is okay with it. Let's start laying the explosives in the WTC.

It aint rock and roll.

And, just to be clear - you're saying the president didn't and doesn't know? Junior BBC reporters deftly ignoring your emails are in on it but the President of the USA wasn't?