Ponty

Yes. It would have got murdered. IMO of course.

Do what I try and do; If I read something that is obviously cheap, ill-informed or an outright lie, I make a sarcastic yet obsequious comment then walk away and don't post on the thread again. Not here, obviously, but on other forums where I'm a regular user.

It can be done but I'd rather you'd just exercise a bit of self-restraint and continue to contribute.

I'm liking the carbon timing belt cover panels.

Gerrard's wife, Alex Curran, doesn't have a sister.

I've been waiting for someone to put that for days on another forum.

Why does anyone care? We all hate refs for most of the year so let them suffer...

Gift horse and all that.

Henry Kelly was into watersports?

Is it that he's going thin on top? We can all see that.

Is it the bloke from The Scissor Sisters?

Is that where you get your facts then?

There's no mystery in either of those statements though. Pyramidal shapes are the most intuitive for a large structure because the "roof" is self-supporting. It stands to reason that more than one person would figure that out and get it built. It also stands to reason that images used to portray Gods a few millennia ago would filter down through society to become the basis for imaginary aliens. After all, all aliens in films are imaginary remember. That's not to say I don't accept the probability (rather than possibility) of alien life in the Universe, I very much do, but if I didn't neither of those arguments would have me changing my mind any time soon.

I doubt anyone would have ever known, what with your skills at hiding your identity and all.

You'd think.

Dave Benson Phillips is your man.

I think you'll find it's Dave, not Stu.

"Dave", if you laid off the insults you might get less from others. Just a thought.

It tells me that he'd be one of the 98% of people who vote "Club" when asked "Club or Country?" on here. It should be different for a player but I guess it isn't always so.

Oh, you did mean that. Righto.

Unless you mean impartiality to the users on here, in which case I'd have to ask why you picked up someone's opinion and called it as a wind up, when there's no evidence to suggest that.

No, I don't get that. Impartial to what? The law? Motoring offences in general? I'm a massive petrol-head with a turbocharged hot hatch that likes to sit pinging quietly on my driveway, after a spirited excursion around my local countryside, but even I think someone who's been legitimately caught speeding on multiple occasions should man up and face the punishment. How is impartiality relevant?

But now your house looks like a kiddy magnet. I'm not sure the neighbours are going to like that.