Jump to content

bridge too far

Members
  • Posts

    14,266
  • Joined

Everything posted by bridge too far

  1. What - like half the population of Holland being employed as our coaching staff?
  2. Try making an apple pie with some cheese in it. Sounds yuck I know but it really does work! My dad used to love apple pie and I made it this way once for him, without telling him there was cheese in it. He said "Bridge, that's the best AP you've ever made". Then I told him Here ya go, y'all: http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Apple-Cheddar-Cheese-Pie/Detail.aspx
  3. COYRs
  4. You're a brave boy, walking down the road on your own with that Good on yer! PS there shouldn't be an apostrophe between COYR and S. There's bound to be an anally retentive pedant who will be quick to pick you up on this.
  5. Yes, that date's quoted in the OP too.
  6. Would that be a trunk call? Boom boom
  7. Although it's a commercial site, this link gives some useful information: http://www.businessresolve.co.uk/questions.htm This may have been said before but if the company has a CVA, the Directors retain control. If it goes into administration, the directors have no control over the running of the business whilst it's in liquidation but still have a fiduciary duty. I'm sorry if this has already been explained. I hadn't seen the difference spelt out quite so clearly.
  8. Yeah I asked this but no-one seems to know:
  9. Significant Shareholders Shareholders who hold more than 3%Amount% Holding Michael Gordon Wilde 4,622,470 16.46 Leon Adrian Crouch 2,794,230 9.95 Rupert James Lowe 1,577,969 5.62 Guy Askham 1,120,000 3.99R M Withers 1,000,000 3.56 Cheviot Asset Management 934,100 3.33 Michael Richards 873,000 3.11 from http://www.hemscott.com/ir/soo/irEssentials.jsp
  10. Bit of a knotty question IMO
  11. Is the information about the bids shared so that an auction can take place? Or are they sealed bids?
  12. Presumably HMRC will be in that group. So I suppose it will depend on how much (if anything) the PLC owes HMRC. But I guess Aviva + Barclays probably at least equals the required 75%?
  13. Hmm the accessible LSE one only shows major shareholders and I bet SLH don't pass this information out. Just thinking ahead about a (maybe) follow-up meeting and letting people know.....
  14. Is there a database of shareholders? From the ones that hold thousands to the ones that hold only one or two?
  15. It's not even proper chicken!
  16. And Sod's Law works every time.
  17. bridge too far

    Gaza

    TDD you really must learn to read what's actually written and not what you think is written. This is what I wrote 3 minutes before your post: I didn't have the privilege of being an election observer so I can't comment on whether elections in Zimbabwe or Palestine were democratic. How on earth can you immediately turn that into 'I'm glad you trust the way Hamas came to power' FFS ?
  18. But hang on - our new DoF is a 'chocolate teapot' and enjoys eating himself
  19. bridge too far

    Gaza

    Doesn't invalidate the argument though. Define a terrorist. To define anything it's OK to use examples from the past as well as the present. I didn't have the privilege of being an election observer so I can't comment on whether elections in Zimbabwe or Palestine were democratic. Did you? The EU DID monitor elections in Gaza, amongst other places. "In 2005, the EU Election Monitoring Missions (EOMs) were deployed to the West Bank/Gaza, Guinea Bissau, Burundi, Ethiopia, and Lebanon; EU EOMs are still in the field in Afghanistan, Liberia and Sri Lanka; and further missions are being prepared for elections in Venezuela, Haiti, West Bank/Gaza and the Democratic Republic of Congo." http://www.europa-eu-un.org/articles/en/article_5203_en.htm IIRC, there was monitoring for the Zimbabwe elections. However, Mugabe chose to ignore the result.
  20. Or Dear Sky I'm in love with two people but not at the same time. One day I went to bed with one of them and then, after a while, I got into bed with the other one. Am I immoral? Should I go back to my first lover or should I just walk away altogether. Sincerely Mikey
  21. bridge too far

    Gaza

    The same argument could be applied to the Israelis who were terrorists in 1940s, as was pointed out whenever this thread started. I don't really care about the minutiae of who did what to whom. The concern I have is for ALL innocent victims, whatever 'side' they're on.
  22. Well maybe here's a way we can sell the club / the directors / the coaches etc. etc. http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/4068318.Sell_yourself_with_the_Daily_Echo/ (in jest and in no way belittling the Echo's efforts to help people btw )
  23. bridge too far

    Gaza

    It's been said before, but it's worth repeating, that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Think back to the Resistance Movement in WWII for example. Or Mandela. And, whether we like it or not, Hamas WAS democratically elected.
×
×
  • Create New...