Weston Super Saint

Source?

Of course not. They just happen more often.

Like a fully funded NHS I guess.

Sadly, this is the level of lunacy that some people think will be easy to negotiate with - they deny killing civilians in Israel despite evidence from their own fighters' helmet cams! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-67321241

Does choosing not to live in London count as a 'good' lifestyle choice? Strikes, cancelled trains, ULEZ, congestion charges and endless protests and demonstrations closing the city down, what a shit place to live.

They were a threat to kids at a concert in Manchester....

Who carried out the other 6 out of 10 and in the name of what cause?

It could also be argued that the Israeli occupation of the West bank has meant the Israeli Government has kept it's people safe - the main responsibility you have stated for their government. What is your solution for peace with Hamas - whose stated intention is that Israel must be completely destroyed until no Jews live in Palestine any longer? That's without the 'world of shit' you refer to.

Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout. Deflection, deflection, deflection. Although I do love your simplistic view of the peace process. Basically, you want it to happen so it should. Forget hundreds of years of land grabs and tensions, aintclever wants it to happen so nothing should get in the way.

Bless you for not understanding (although I appreciate it is another complex subject). From Hamas's Charter, article 13 this is what they say about the 'peace solution' and therefore a two state solution : I've made the relevant bit stand out for you. Whilst I appreciate that the charter is over 20 years old, I don't believe Hamas have changed their mind on this issue and their past and recent actions have certainly leant towards the fact that they haven't softened their position - unless you have any evidence to the contrary? It's cute that you lay the blame solely at the feet of the Israelis, but shows your lack of understanding. Instead of continually deflecting, you've previously stated "A main responsibility of any government is to keep its people safe", so why are you so determined not to answer the question "So what's your suggestion for how they could have kept their people safe before 7/10?"

Fair enough - at least we know you are happy for one terrorist group to be eliminated so far as is possible. So what's your suggestion for how they could have kept their people safe before 7/10?

I think you've misunderstood the meaning of 'tailgating' if you think that's what happens at traffic lights!

I'm sure you do. Just like you thought taking out ISIS would make the world less safe. So what's your suggestion for how they could have kept their people safe before 7/10?

So you agree that Israel is justified in its invasion of Gaza to 'wipe out Hamas' and therefore keep its people safe?

Not making much difference on that front.

There should be no need for a protest as Hamas will surely return all of the hostages, thus ensuring there is a pause in hostilities. Right?

Just goes to show, some people are always ahead of others

....

People who pull up to traffic lights but leave too much room, then start inching forward as more and more cars join the queue.

Really? Several hundred heavily armed soldiers who are sworn to protect the King come face to face with a protest march at the Cenotaph where the King just happens to be. What could possibly go wrong?

Maybe, maybe not....

Only a picture of the teeth will tell them apart.

Seriously? My previous response to this was deleted despite this being a post clearly about other posters. I'll ask again, where did I say I supported Netanyahu commiting war crimes?

To be fair, having read through the 'charter of Allah', I get the impression from the tone of some of the articles that it was cobbled together by a number (I reckon at least 3) of different people. One seems overly aggressive, one seems your regular Zealot and one seems almost a pacifist. But there doesn't seem to be much proof reading that has happened and the person in charge of continuity must have been on leave when they published it. Maybe it's just different interpretations of Allah's promises throughout the articles, or maybe some articles have been added in to make them seem less mental?

They can only be a 'brother' religion once they accept Islam as the 'one true religion'. I think we all know the chances of that happening.