Holmes_and_Watson

He invested in a PL team that he would have been told was in need of support. Mr Football and Kraft sold him on ideas of lowering individual wages, while bringing in talent on the cusp of bigger things like Tino, and players and managers with things to prove. We've sadly ended up with very much a Championship team. One, who will be on lower individual wages, partly through relegation clauses. But we have lots of them, with no clear strategy to date. Solak got done by Rasmus, who may have believed his nonsense himself. Selling up was an option before he moved in to take greater control. But he relied on others in the football world who have not delivered. As noted, the timing would have been better if he was selling anywhere from October, when the writing was already on the wall. I guess we'll have to see what state we're left in to face next season.

All the times he lit a Candle in the Wind increased global warming. 🙂

Standing

Surely depends on how you look at it. 🙂

Under BBC Klopp fawning headline of "no one expected this" "If you had asked Liverpool fans back in August would their team win the Premier League, most would have said no," says former Reds goalkeeper Sander Westerveld. Jurgen Klopp was always going to be the hardest of acts to follow as manager.

When their inspiration, Klopp, is declared Pope, it will tie in more. 🙂

Updating fans on the managerial vacancy, technical director Johannes "chuckles" Spors said "Following extensive reviews of the club's processes, the first task is clearly to minimise the lurch between managerial changes. We, at SR, are committed to burning through 3 managers a season. That's the left field SR way. If you don't succeed, repeat the same doomed process. Gone will be the uncertainty of which system we will be lurching to! By hiring one head coach, but paying a retainer, for first option, on 2 others with different requirements, we can seamlessly bring in coaches to deal with our bloated, yet incomplete, squad." When asked if the time saved with this innovation could allow for a fourth manager in a season, Spors eyes lit up, and he raced back into the building juggling on his unicycle.

Barton is more of a perfect tit, than a perfect fit. 🙂

Not even if we renamed him James Cameron Archer. 🙂

And in the beginning, god created Anfield. Realising that the greatest club needed some context, the rest of the universe followed. So glad Sky News Liverpool is there for months of Trent Watch. And the other Liverpool channels there to distract me when that gets overwhelming.

Although, there are times where the loan move ends, the player departs and they still become a bit of a legend to get attached to.

Yup. The quote noticeably avoids any timescales. Making his desire clear about his future, Fernandes said: “I want to return to Sporting.” Could be where he wants to end his career, for all that makes clear.

Well, this episode of "twat" or "imbecile" has taken a dark turn. (Note: If Farmer responds to this, it means I'm in the clear.)

I know. I can't believe we've scored that often, either. 🙂

badger has just picked up on this. You can be better than this, surely? No. I wouldn't agree that I do. I can think of one other, who shares some of your attributes. More broadly, it's not for me to judge as to whether I actually am. If lots of others were to suddenly tell me I was, I'd certainly listen. Clearly, their bribes need some renegotiation 🙂 I am much the same offline, as on. Or at least, try to be. Although, it's not anywhere near as Saints focused. My family have seen Close Encounters. So, if I start building Stoneham stadium out of potatoes, it's off for "help"...again. 🙂 I think you've missed something. All some posters have done for a day, is raise a little mirror to your posting. That I'm suddenly a "deeply unpleasant" "stalker" should be making you think about what you do here.

Ah, who needs athleticism, height, power and pace, when you have....um...what is it we have, again? 🙂

Did Hoddle have his views on past lives, before he joined us? Or did he just spend time here, and reach the obvious conclusion. 🙂

No. I somehow manage not to be a twat here or elsewhere. Quiet, the rest of you. 🙂 Why you have to be at all, is baffling.

I was going to move on. But wanted to just ask that you consider lines like that. You have no idea who on the forum has autism or who cares/ supports others who do in whatever capacity. It's a definite example of why you, by your own admission, "come across as a twat".

A disappointing evening for those who picked "imbecile" as MLG has confirmed "twat" 🙂 Suggestion: Have a go at talking to the people here, in the same way you talk to people elsewhere.

At no point did I say they didn't. You made the statement that the one presented here didn't work on any level. It seems a natural query to one who is very literal minded when it suits, to ask how the posted analogy failed at all of those levels. Sadly, you've just given some levels of analogy, and not how they apply here. Once again, you are a disappointment. I'm beginning to think you really didn't check at all, then rushed off to find a page about analogies. Perhaps you'll do better once you've answered trousers, or cleared up the evidence of you editing posts to change their meaning, after people have responded/reacted. It wouldn't do, to be a "dishonest troll" after all.

Thanks egg. I was going to find your post saying this earlier. MLG posts. MLG gets a response/ reaction showing him to be wrong/an imbecile/both MLG goes back and edits his post. MLG then pretends that the edited version is the only reality, as that's what he meant all along. Your section long "typo" was from today. The editing post was the one egg is referring to. My post said:- And I noticed that you've not learned about editing your posts to try and change their meaning. You got caught out on this thread doing it [when you asked what was wrong with intolerance], and you've been editing away again [the post where you've added a section]. I see your argument has shifted away from the "no, I didn't" section and into the "so, what if I did" one. Tragic. It's all there for anyone who wants a laugh at your childishness. A number were laughing at you, at the time. So, since it was someone else who posted those, and you mistakenly are blaming me for starting it, I guess I can't be "stalking you across threads" then, either. Because anyone doing that would need a shovel, like the guy cleaning up after the elephant on Blue Peter.

No. You said "analogy doesn't work on any level." You've shown nothing to prove that you, happy to nitpick others, has done even the most basic of checks on the levels of analogy, and how they apply in this instance. Which is probably why everyone else knows you're wrong again.

That's quite a typo. Your original post said:- 1) No one in this thread had posted that link. The link was relevant to a post in this thread that it was replying to. 2) Do you read every single new post in every thread before making your next post each time? The response to those points was:- ) Utterly predictable. Never mind that the same information has been given. If you can say the same thing, from another source, you think it's breaking news. You've been peddling that nonsense for any number of transfer threads, where you just *had* to be seen to give the news. Like a man-child on X (sorry, you'd call it twitter), you've given up in a sulk when others kept getting in ahead of you. 2) As I'm here most days, yes, I generally do. There's not that much to catch up on, if visits are regular. If it's a discussion, then definitely, as it's just courtesy to the other posters, to know their views. But then, I don't set out to undercut other posters. That's what people would have seen, and the thread moved on. But look! Later on, the world's biggest "typo" has added a whole new section! 1) No one in this thread had posted that link. The link was relevant to a post in this thread that it was replying to. 2) Do you read every single new post in every thread before making your next post each time? 3) "We all knew about it" Even if your answer to 2 is yes, do you really believe everyone else does? 4) Had anyone else on this forum made that post, would you reply to it? I guess you will come up with a reason why only me, but 1 to 3 shows why you are wrong. Edited 6 hours ago by Matthew Le God Caught out again. Someone described you as "tragic" which seems a good fit.

It was @Paul Chuckle who posted your FM guides, and your feelings regarding stadium names. You then made the choice to pretend you meant something else, admit lying to your readers, blame other thread creators and then blame SI. I forget if that was when you went off in a sulk, as we were laughing at your desperate deflection so much. That thread stays in my mind because it could easily have turned out completely different. You just had to dig yourself a hole. When you put us all on ignore, you won't have to see any of our responses. Using ignore was your suggestion. "No excuse not to" use it. No answer for trousers? No list of why analogies work? I think that's just this page. Undoubtedly more things you've gone quiet on.