Jump to content

Fuengirola Saint

Members
  • Posts

    564
  • Joined

Everything posted by Fuengirola Saint

  1. If you think this is rubbish fair enough,thats your opinion but i think you´ll find Lord Montagu had a bit of a windfall on the 1st of April 1990 whereas the family in Millbrook had their income cut by quite a big percentage as their rates would have been included in their rent,which was not reduced. I´m sorry but to me that is helping the rich.
  2. Are the Governments unemployment figures correct? The Office for National Statistics said the number of working-age people in work less households jumped by 500,000 to 4.8 million in the year to June. The UK's Government current unemployment figures are around 2.6 million, so does that mean that in reality 2.0 million plus people not claiming or in receipt of unemployment benefit - as per the Government's own unemployment figure. 6 months ago You put this information in your reply ( Wes Tender) and i agree with the top part, there are many more people unemployed than the figures suggest. If we used the last method that the Conservatives used in 1997 the figure of 2.6 million would be 1.8 million or thereabouts. I still cannot see how the government have changed the way we measure unemployment to lower the figures
  3. All i´m saying is that the last set of figures used by the Tories were only the JSA claimant count and that the government changed the way they were worked out by using the International Labour Organisation´s method. You implied that the government manipulated the figures to make the unemployment rate seem lower when in fact the changes made actually raised the figure.
  4. Because a family with four adults living for example in Millbrook in a council house would have paid around 1200 pounds a year, the same as Lord Montagu ( With four adults in his house as well ) in his enormous mansion in Beaulieu. It was a regressive tax dressed up a a fairer solution to the rates problem, designed with one thing in mind, to help the rich!
  5. Well said that man!
  6. THEY ARE NOT SOCIALISTS YOU CHUMP! ( Sorry for shouting but someone needs to get through to him )
  7. I remember Tim Vokes, never knew he was Sam Vokes old man though
  8. I know what you mean mush, there is always some little **** ready to ruin a good and interesting thread. I´ve said it before but it pains me that Saints have got so many numptys ( or numpties, not sure) as supporters. I didn´t start going until 78 and the season after they put the fences up in the Archers, i always remember QPR always trying it on in the Archers, usually coming unstuck though.
  9. I wouldn't go that far ;-)
  10. +1.
  11. +1,
  12. I agree, they are just career politicians the majority of them. I don't understand why the Tories on here hate Labour so much, they are a centre right-right wing government anyway,exactly what they profess to support, i.e laissez faire economics.
  13. Joiners ring any bells? They are nothing special.
  14. Whats with all this bigging up Pompeys mob? They are not some super hard firm, they are more or less the same as us, if anything Saints have been more active in recent years
  15. +1.
  16. I'm in Málaga capital although my name says Fuengirola Saint, I moved from there about a year ago. Are you living in Marbella?
  17. Well said that man! I am gutted that we have so many Tories as fans. :-(
  18. Grow up you knob! If you were joking i take the remark back, if not Grow up you knob!
  19. We did, i was there as it was one of my few trips back, i've seen one Saints victory in 5 yrs :-(
  20. What does dawn site mean?? I think you mean darned sight don't you? HTH I noticed another dig at Le Tissier, you can't help yourself can you? PS: Its Cortese not Coretes!
  21. :-)
  22. Sorry, i might get infracted or something but it's plain to see that you are just a **** plain and simple!
×
×
  • Create New...